Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these didn't go into testing this past weekend, they should all be ready. mumps and hdf5 have now

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Ready to transition: mumps, petsc, slepc, hdf5 -- not sure why these didn't go into testing this

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 22:40 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 16:28:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 11:42 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:05:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Ready to transition: mumps, petsc,

Re: ongoing slepc/petsc transition

2012-03-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 17:03:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Oh dear. Do we need to do this for every reverse-depends package in order for the whole thing to transition? Yes. If you have a list of debs a single bug probably works though. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: