Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

Dear Pierre, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 09:02:54AM +0100, Pierre Saramito wrote: > I just commit with git a new release 7.0-1 of the debianisation of the > rheolef package: > this corresponds to a new version 7.0 of the upstream package: >

Re: RFS: spyder/3.2.6+dfsg1-2 [RC]

Sorry to insist, but the app is currently broken on both Debian unstable and the next Ubuntu LTS. The changes are just two small patches for the setup.py metadata. Thanks, Ghis Le dimanche 04 mars 2018 à 17:08 +, Ghislain Vaillant a écrit : > Dear DST, > > Could someone upload the following

RFS: python-meshio/1.11.7-2 [RC]

Dear DST, Could someone sponsor this update to python-meshio [1], which fixes an RC currently affecting the packaging. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/python-meshio Thanks, Ghis

Re: RFS: spyder/3.2.6+dfsg1-2 [RC]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:30:44PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > python{,3}-spyderlib are translational packages, hence the failure. The > default autopkgtests for Python are not appropriate for this source > package. Ok, uploaded. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer

Re: RFS: python-meshio/1.11.7-2 [RC]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:42:10PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Could someone sponsor this update to python-meshio [1], which fixes an > RC currently affecting the packaging. Thanks, uploaded. P.S.: when asking for sponshorship, please leave the changelog as UNRELEASED and do not push the

Re: RFS: spyder/3.2.6+dfsg1-2 [RC]

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:38:42PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Sorry to insist, but the app is currently broken on both Debian > unstable and the next Ubuntu LTS. The changes are just two small > patches for the setup.py metadata. I get two autopkgtest failures: autopkgtest [21:49:55]:

Re: RFS: spyder/3.2.6+dfsg1-2 [RC]

Le 8 mars 2018 20:52, "Sébastien Villemot" a écrit : On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:38:42PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Sorry to insist, but the app is currently broken on both Debian > unstable and the next Ubuntu LTS. The changes are just two small > patches for the

Re: Bug#886399: RFS: opencascade/7.2.0-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Alright, I've addressed all the points brought up by you two (thanks for the feedback so far!) I have done a thorough check of the licenses, updated d/copyright, and found a few problematic Qt Commercial license files, which I reported to upstream. [1] But,