Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2018-03-28 Thread Pierre Saramito
Dear Sebastien, I've just update the upstream branch and merge it into master. The repository should now contains the 7.0 version. Is there something else to do for the new 7.0 version in Debian ? Many thanks for your help, Pierre -- pierre.saram...@imag.fr Directeur de Recherche CNRS

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2018-03-28 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Dear Pierre, On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:42:27PM +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote: > I've just update the upstream branch and merge it into master. > The repository should now contains the 7.0 version. > Is there something else to do for the new 7.0 version in Debian ? As with every new upstream

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2018-03-28 Thread Pierre Saramito
Dear Sebastien, > In this precise case, this file looks incorect: it states that most of the > code > is GPL-3 (only) and that utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1 (only). But these two > licenses are incompatible! > Looking at the source code, it looks like utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1+ (note the > plus, which

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2018-03-28 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:18:28PM +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote: > > In this precise case, this file looks incorect: it states that most of the > > code > > is GPL-3 (only) and that utils/bamg/* is LGPL-2.1 (only). But these two > > licenses are incompatible! > > Looking at the source code, it

Re: HELP needed for uploading a new upstream version of the Rheolef package

2018-03-28 Thread Sébastien Villemot
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 04:50:29PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > - there are files under Copyright 2000 Gray Watson and under the NTP license, > not mentioned in debian/copyright: > config/dmalloc_return.h > util/dmallocxx/conf.h > util/dmallocxx/dmallocc.cc >