Re: Pandas new version

2019-02-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019, Ole Streicher wrote: > "Rebecca N. Palmer" writes: > > Has anyone checked whether this would break pandas' reverse dependencies? > I didn't yet. I just tried to update the packaging to 0.24, which > however has a number of test failures, which would need to be discussed >

Re: Pandas new version

2019-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
HI Yaroslav, On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 02:07:52PM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > otherwise, I would wholeheartedly welcome simplifications as long as > pandas builds seamlessly also at least on debian stable (or soon > oldstable) and some recent ubuntus. Supporting Stretch (=stable and soon

Bug#921460: dead upstream - keep out of testing

2019-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Package: clsparse Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org, ghisv...@gmail.com (plus an identical one for freefem3d) This package is dead upstream, and it has been suggested [0] that because of this, it should not be fixed for buster. I don't know enough about it to

Re: Pandas new version

2019-02-05 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 08:48:09AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > > On a longer term, it would be good to clean this package up (removing > > f.e. the special Cython handling) -- Yaroslav, how much do you still > > these things? Since Panda is one of

Re: Pandas new version

2019-02-05 Thread Ole Streicher
Yaroslav Halchenko writes: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2019, Ole Streicher wrote: >> "Rebecca N. Palmer" writes: >> > Has anyone checked whether this would break pandas' reverse dependencies? > >> I didn't yet. I just tried to update the packaging to 0.24, which >> however has a number of test failures,

Re: Pandas new version

2019-02-05 Thread Ole Streicher
"Rebecca N. Palmer" writes: > Has anyone checked whether this would break pandas' reverse dependencies? I didn't yet. I just tried to update the packaging to 0.24, which however has a number of test failures, which would need to be discussed with upstream first. Also, the package is a bit

Re: Pandas new version

2019-02-05 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 08:48:09AM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > > On a longer term, it would be good to clean this package up (removing > f.e. the special Cython handling) -- Yaroslav, how much do you still > these things? Since Panda is one of the universal packages, it would be > good to have