Le jeudi 08 mai 2008 à 07:22 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote:
If there is to be any sort of reorganization, ...
So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far. I do not really
know what this means, but I think we should not let the activity
[ Tuesday 06 May 2008 ]
| With respect to the packaging policy
| http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2008/05/msg00029.html (for
| pkg-science or whatever it turns into), for the sake of simplicity, I
| would suggest to adopt and adapt the Debian Med existing policy:
|
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
We could wait a few days more.
Surely we could, but I'm learned in the past that some days tend to
increase to some weeks while the number some is stretched in the
same way then the time unit.
They are doing a nice and important work.
No doubt
Hello
| David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-05-06 11:23:34) :
| Speaking as the maintainer of all packages in pkg-science ( all 3 :-)
| ), I don't mind any sort of merging plan. But I understood from
| previous mails from C. Prudhomme that he (and others?) preferred to
| keep pkg-scicomp a
[ Thursday 08 May 2008 ]
| So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far.
see my answer to Frederic.
| I do not really
| know what this means,
it means I am busy. Being a professor at a university is certainly a busy
job ;). Moreover it is holiday here in France.
| but I think we
Andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote:
If there is to be any sort of reorganization, ...
Andreas So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far. I do
Andreas not really know what this means, but I think we should
Le Fri, May 09, 2008 at 01:43:59AM +0200, David Bremner a écrit :
Also git naturally produces a one repo per package viewpoint
(which is a bit awkward for people like pkg-perl, but not so
conclusive for us, I think).
Hi all,
In Debian-Med we are trying to understand better Git in order to see
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:43 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not seem to make sense to me to get carried away with
infrastructure from the very start (also, like almost everyone else, I
have only so much time for Debian). What do we need minimally to get
started? I would say
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:18 -0500, Bryan Bishop wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:43 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not seem to make sense to me to get carried away with
infrastructure from the very start (also, like almost everyone else, I
have only so much time for
A Dijous 08 Maig 2008, Andreas Tille va escriure:
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
The robotics area is very wide. To many kind of packages could go there,
You should probably come up with a list of these many packages to gain the
interest of people here.
Well, I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
