On Fri, 9 May 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
package1/trunk/
package1/branches/
package2/trunk/
package2/branches/
[..]
tags/package1/
tags/package2/
And finally write down this in a policy document to keep people informed ...
This is forgotten to often, unfurtunately.
Kind regards
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Antonio Paiva wrote:
Just thought remembered today that all of you latex users (like me)
would like to know about latexdiff
(http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/support/latexdiff/).
Added to debian-science/tasks/typesetting which is rendered at
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/
> "Daniel" == Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> Shouldn't git-svn help here? I know several projects on
Daniel> sf.net where authors use it to maintain the source locally
Daniel> with git and "online" with subversion.
Daniel> So people can choose to use svn or
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 08:54 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ross Boylan wrote:
>
> > packagesearch should be useful.
>
> But sounds also quite incomplete. I tested seeking "Biology" where
> I know a lot of relevant packages but it brought up not nearly half
> the relevant packa
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 09:20:39PM -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> Interesting. I have been writing my thesis as a back-and-forth thing
> between my advisor and me, and I print it out, he writes on the
> margins, I retype things, and it goes back to him. The best
> replacement to the bubble
Just thought remembered today that all of you latex users (like me)
would like to know about latexdiff
(http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/support/latexdiff/). This perl script
compares two versions of a latex document and generates another latex
file which, when compiled, has the differences highligh
Am Freitag, den 09.05.2008, 13:40 +0200 schrieb Manuel Prinz:
[..]
> I also do care about the VCS. Personally, I'm very happy with Git that I
> tried after last DebConf after hearing so much good things about it;
> they turned out to be true. ;) The biggest disadvantage with Subversion
> is that o
CCed pkg-scicomp-devel
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 15:18 +0200 schrieb Christophe
Prud'homme:
> | but I think we should not let the activity boil
> | down. Would you take over the job to restructure either pkg-science
> | or start a debian-science repository? I leave the choice of the name
Hello Adam,
Le vendredi 09 mai 2008 à 09:33 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit :
>
>
> By the way, speaking of size, would anyone mind if I drop the static
> libs from the -dev package? They are enormous, they double the build
> time and more than double the storage requirement, and I don't think
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:43 AM, David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What do we need minimally to get
> started?
Hi,
FWIW, I would also like to support the name 'debian-science' as the
name of the project and git as the VCS.
I think the easiest way to get things started would be to just cr
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:35 +0200, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've put a brief start (6 of the 536 directories in ros/src) in:
> > http://www.opennovation.org/audits/opencascade-6.2.txt and will update
> > it as I and others
Regarding the number of replies and the will to do something on this, we
could do something on this!
> I'd also like to help. To also address my concerns on the name: As
> Andreas already said, I also think naming discussions tend to go
> nowhere. BUT in this case, I'd really prefer "debian-scienc
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
I'm probably offline until Monday but would volunteer to get the
repository installed and set up. I guess I can report back on Wednesday
next week latest, if that's considered a reasonable time frame.
Sure.
I'll have a closer look but at the first glac
Am Freitag, den 09.05.2008, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Well, follow the DoOcracy principle: The doer decides. If I understood
> right David Bremner volunteered also to work actively on a repository
> with exactly the same preferences like you. So I guess he is not really
> unhappy if yo
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Sorry for jumping a little late into the discussion, hope it's not too
late already!
So far nothing technically has changed - so it is not too late obviousely.
Andreas, I really like your idea on unifying things
related to science in Debian. I also hav
Hi everyone!
Sorry for jumping a little late into the discussion, hope it's not too
late already! Andreas, I really like your idea on unifying things
related to science in Debian. I also have some packages I work on that
are science related but do not classically match any of the current
tasks.
A
> "Charles" == Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Charles> In Debian-Med we are trying to understand better Git in
Charles> order to see if it would make sense to switch from
Charles> Subversion. So far, the ability to do repository-wide
Charles> changes was useful to u
17 matches
Mail list logo
