Re: building package with different libs

2008-11-18 Thread Manuel Prinz
[ Sorry for the long email! I wanted to express my view and as a non-native speaker, it's not always easy to be precise. Hope you don't mind. ] Am Dienstag, den 18.11.2008, 08:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV: On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 21:04 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 14 November 2008 at

Re: building package with different libs

2008-11-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 23:06 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: [ Sorry for the long email! I wanted to express my view and as a non-native speaker, it's not always easy to be precise. Hope you don't mind. ] No problem at all! Am Dienstag, den 18.11.2008, 08:05 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV: On

Re: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] building package with different libs

2008-11-18 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 18 November 2008 at 23:03, Adam C Powell IV wrote: | All things considered, OpenMPI has my vote as the most advanced | implementation right now... Thanks for that. Given that we need to order these (presented alphabetically) LAM ? MPICH ? Open MPI I suggest the following: i) LAM

Re: [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] building package with different libs

2008-11-18 Thread Ross Boylan
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 22:25 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 18 November 2008 at 23:03, Adam C Powell IV wrote: | All things considered, OpenMPI has my vote as the most advanced | implementation right now... Thanks for that. Given that we need to order these (presented alphabetically)