Hi,
some years ago I took over libblitz++ without having any real use for it
but I was asked whether I'd be able to help. I've putted the package
under Debian Science maintenance because it is a library which is used
in scientific programming. But I was tho only Uploader so far.
For the moment
Adam,
I certainly missed some emails but the recent petsc3.1 upload compiled with
lam (and not the default openmi) provoked a massive breakage on my side:
slepc and life (which uses also slepc).
I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi compiled
(build-depending on)
[ please Cc:-me on replies, I'm not subscribed ]
Hello scientists!,
I've blogged about my visit at EDF which is using Debian, and most
notably quite some work of Debian Science, to power their clusters and
desktops.
The post is at
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Adam,
I certainly missed some emails but the recent petsc3.1 upload compiled
with
lam (and not the default openmi) provoked a massive breakage on my
side:
slepc and life (which uses also slepc).
Oh no!
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 08:31 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:35 +0200, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
I managed to recompile life without slepc but I also use boost mpi
compiled (build-depending on) with mpi-default-dev (as well as life)
and combining
Hi all,
2010/5/27 Carsten Aulbert carsten.aulb...@aei.mpg.de
Hi Stefano et al.
[please cc me as well, as I'm not on d-scie...@l.d.o
On Thursday 27 May 2010 14:12:09 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The post is at
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/05/Debian-based_scientific_computin
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 14:27 +0200, Carsten Aulbert wrote:
On Thursday 27 May 2010 14:12:09 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The post is at
http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2010/05/Debian-based_scientific_computin
g_at_EDF/ and kudos your work, so it's probably appropriate to mention
On 27/05/10 at 14:12 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Related to that, I'm now collecting some feedback about other users of
Debian in scientific computing / cluster environments. What would be the
most appropriate venue to have people interested in that topic discuss
together? Would this list
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Jerome Robert wrote:
Hi all,
Hi Alexandre, it's been a long time !
We are also interested in using Debian on our cluster. We are currently using
SystemImager on Redhat for the deployment. Our file server nodes have already
been migrated to Squeeze. I'm still thinking
Thanks Adam for your very quick answer !
I was quite worried in fact and now I am relieved :)
I'll upload a new slepc and life tomorrow
I am still angry at the PETSc guys, they made again very slight changes to
their interface
and it breaks slepc and life.
It is not big deal (at least from what
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[ please Cc:-me on replies, I'm not subscribed ]
Hello scientists!,
I've blogged about my visit at EDF which is using Debian, and most
notably quite some work of Debian Science, to power their clusters and
desktops.
The post is at
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:48:39PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 27/05/10 at 14:12 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Related to that, I'm now collecting some feedback about other users of
Debian in scientific computing / cluster environments. What would be the
most appropriate venue to
12 matches
Mail list logo
