Hi Gordon,
thanks for your investigation.
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 04:05:22PM +0200, Gordon Ball wrote:
> Having had a better look at some of the less obvious failings:
>
> r-bioc-biocparallel
> ---
>
> Non-deterministic? Seems to fail about 80% of the time in
>
Hi,
I have updated r-cran-tgp [1] to the latest upstream version (2.4-14),
which fixes #820866.
The new upstream version requires a new dependency, r-cran-maptree [2],
which I just packaged (ITP #823320).
Could somebody please upload these packages ?
Thanks,
Pablo
[1]
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 02:17:42PM +, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> I've imported the repo into [1] where I'll do some work,
it's missing the pristine-tar branch.
Please also import the pristine-tar details into the repository. Given
that apparently your gbp config doesn't have 'pristine-tar =
I've imported the repo into [1] where I'll do some work, later this week we
can move it to alioth.
Cheers,
Nico
[1] https://github.com/nschloe/debian-superlu
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 3:34 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:14:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 01:14:38PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:48:24AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > @Mattia would you mind moving SuperLU over to /git?
>
> Conversion ongoing.
> Will notify once done.
Well, it has been super quick, probably because there is
[ keeping only the list in the recipients. But you did good at mailing
me explicitly, otherwise I'd have ignored this email ]
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:48:24AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> @Mattia would you mind moving SuperLU over to /git?
Conversion ongoing.
Will notify once done.
--
Thanks!
> That's worth a bug report "New version available" via reportbug.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823213
> The best way to tackle this is IMHO becoming a member of Debian Science
team,
I already am. :)
> fix it in VCS (may be by moving packaging to Git) a
Very
Hi Nico,
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 09:30:03AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > So if you have a real question rather than this meta-question you should
> ask it here.
>
> Yup, well, SuperLU in Debian is pretty outdated and the new version allows
> for a much simpler build process.
That's worth a
Thanks for the info!
> So if you have a real question rather than this meta-question you should
ask it here.
Yup, well, SuperLU in Debian is pretty outdated and the new version allows
for a much simpler build process. The debian config can probably be
improved. I was going to ask how this could
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:18:23AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Nico Schlömer
> wrote:
> > Does anyone know who is the current maintainer for SuperLU [1] and where to
> > find the debian repo?
>
> The maintainer is Debian Science
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: lumin
X-Debbugs-CC: costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it, ghisv...@gmail.com,
debian-science@lists.debian.org
Hi,
#788539 is cpu version of caffe, this is CUDA version.
CPU version goes into main section while this CUDA version
goes into
Hi,
>set(CFLAGS ...) which should be replaced by set(CFLAGS $(CFLAGS) ...)
>
>An upstream classic unfortunately.
as upstream I did this once, and the side effect was something weird.
when you run multiple times cmake .. the cflags gets appended multiple times,
so you might
end up in a really
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> Does anyone know who is the current maintainer for SuperLU [1] and where to
> find the debian repo?
The maintainer is Debian Science Maintainers and the debian repo is
available in debian-science svn repo:
Hi everyone,
Does anyone know who is the current maintainer for SuperLU [1] and where to
find the debian repo?
Cheers,
Nico
[1] https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/superlu
On 03/05/16 03:08, lumin wrote:
- d/*.install.in: no multi-arch install paths? why?
I have no plan to make multiarch support for this package,
because that makes no sense. In production environment
Caffe is a computational intensive and memory-consuming
application, and I believe no user will
no nibbles? i would appreciate a sponsor.
with thanks
On 30/04/2016 19:30, Jonathon Love wrote:
hi folks,
i've been packaging the flatbuffers project, and i think it might be
ready to go (although, perhaps it should be submitted independent of
debian-science).
i've pushed the work to:
16 matches
Mail list logo