Dear all,
I used to own a guest account on Alioth, and with this account I have
created a few packaging GIT repositories. However, since the transition
to GitLab-Salsa I am unable to push my commits:
andrius@tasmanijos-velnias cod-tools $ git remote set-url origin
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 12:58:16AM +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> dah .. I sent the reverse patch sorry:
>
> diff --git a/debian/patches/use_debian_packaged_libgit2.patch
> b/debian/patches/use_debian_packaged_libgit2.patch
> index c716773..ab603cd 100644
> ---
Hi Aaron,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 06:37:17PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > Hi,
>
> Hi, Andreas.
>
> > gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I. -I/usr/include/git2
> > -DGIT_ARCH_64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DGIT_OPENSSL
>
dah .. I sent the reverse patch sorry:
diff --git a/debian/patches/use_debian_packaged_libgit2.patch
b/debian/patches/use_debian_packaged_libgit2.patch
index c716773..ab603cd 100644
--- a/debian/patches/use_debian_packaged_libgit2.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/use_debian_packaged_libgit2.patch
@@
Curiosity drove me to give it a look. From what I understand: libgit2 seems
to be multiplatform and for some of the platforms (this time Windows) they
are shipping files with the same names that those that we can find in
/usr/include, in this case inttypes.h. You have include in your patch to
use
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi,
Hi, Andreas.
> gcc -std=gnu99 -I/usr/share/R/include -DNDEBUG -I. -I/usr/include/git2
> -DGIT_ARCH_64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -DGIT_OPENSSL
> -DLIBGIT2_NO_FEATURES_H -DGIT_SHA1_OPENSSL - DGIT_SSH -DGIT_CURL
>
Hi,
I looked into this as well this evening and didn't really understand what they
are
doing. Did you ask the upstream authors why they didn't just depend on libgit2
as
they did for libssh2, OpenSSL, ...? It's probably easier to understand the
problem
with their help. [If you don't want to do
Hi,
r-cran-git2r was rejected by ftpmaster[1] due to the code copy of
libgit2. I intended to fix this by removing the code copy and linking
against the Debian packaged libgit2. The attempt to do so can be found
in Git[2]. Unfortunately that seems to be not as simple as I was
hoping for since
Hi Leo,
I built coin3d+cmake in experimental trying to fix #874727.
But yes, one need to build also soqt and pivy.
Qt5+Coin3 is difficult because freecad does not support it yet.
I am not going to maintain coin3+soqt+pivy.. any more (very
limited time and no use of those packages).
Regards
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
>
> The only thing that might be worth considering, is whether you
> > think an own Debian Robotics Blend would fly (in terms of contributors
> > and number of packages). In this case a separate packaging team
Will do if I get an answer. I already sent the question to
ad...@alioth.debian.org on Monday.
Best,
Tobias
On 01/10/2018 02:57 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> And please share your findings. We got the same behavior iirc on our
> NeuroDebian etc mailing lists, but haven't dealt with it yet (at
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:29:38PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> > I'm personally not scared by the flat name space. I do not think that
> > "hiding" metainformation in a subgroup / subdir is not really helpful in
> > the end.
>
> I'm sorry but I don't understand you here. Maybe
Hi,
Coin3d is moving to CMake as build system ans SoQt is moving to Qt5 (finally).
Anton, I have seen that you have pushed to experimental coin3 with CMake.
It would be possible to have a version in Debian (at least in experimental) os
SoQt build with Qt5 and begin a transition of all the
Hi Charles,
this looks nice!
Happy New Year,
Johannes
P.S.: I hope to learn a bit more about git-buildpackage in order to be able to
contribute to stretch-backports in 2018.
Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2018, 20:59:22 CET schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just drafted a r-pkg-team
On 10/01/18 11:20, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Leopold,
>
> since you give permission to post on Debian Science I do so in public.
> Please always keep the blog posting of our beloved DPL in mind!
:-)
>https://chris-lamb.co.uk/posts/dont-ask-your-questions-in-private
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 11:51:48AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > In any case it makes sense to register debia...@lists.debian.org since
> > we need a proper discussion list for discussions like we are actually
> > doing
And please share your findings. We got the same behavior iirc on our
NeuroDebian etc mailing lists, but haven't dealt with it yet (at least got
subscribers)
On January 10, 2018 6:12:57 AM EST, "Sébastien Villemot"
wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:43:25AM +0100, Tobias
Hi Philip,
[ moving the discussion to Debian Science list[1] ;-) ]
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:17:05PM +0100, Philip Rinn wrote:
> if you need help packaging all the stuff for Shiny-server, I'm happy to
> assist.
> Do you have written down somewhere what's left to do?
Some local manual
Hello everybody,
I just drafted a r-pkg-team page on wiki.debian.org:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/r-pkg-team
Please feel free, to correct, expand, ...
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:43:25AM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
> due to the deprecation of Alioth I now want to ask for a replacement of
> debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org on lists.debian.org. I would
> like the archive to be imported and followed the instructions on [1] to
>
Hi Tobias,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:43:25AM +0100, Tobias Hansen wrote:
>
> due to the deprecation of Alioth I now want to ask for a replacement of
> debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org on lists.debian.org. I would
> like the archive to be imported and followed the instructions
Hi,
due to the deprecation of Alioth I now want to ask for a replacement of
debian-science-sagem...@lists.alioth.debian.org on lists.debian.org. I would
like the archive to be imported and followed the instructions on [1] to export
the mbox file, but it didn't work:
thansen@moszumanska:~$
Hi Leopold,
since you give permission to post on Debian Science I do so in public.
Please always keep the blog posting of our beloved DPL in mind!
https://chris-lamb.co.uk/posts/dont-ask-your-questions-in-private
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:08:47AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> I
Hi list
My packages Qwt5 and pyqwt5 will be removed with the removal of Qt4 from Debian
and yesterday I was looking at the
reverse dependencies and a few of the packages have maintainers on this list.
$ apt-cache rdepends libqwt5-qt4
libqwt5-qt4
Reverse Depends: libqwt5-qt4-dev
24 matches
Mail list logo