On Sun, 2018-04-29 at 21:50 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 09:18:08AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > The discussion raises a separate question. Suppose the
> > administrator
> > does make OpenBLAS the preferred alternative for the system, but an
> > individual user
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 09:18:08AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote:
> The discussion raises a separate question. Suppose the administrator
> does make OpenBLAS the preferred alternative for the system, but an
> individual user prefers to use IntelMKL. How should the user configure
> this (for the
Dear Lumin,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 07:28:20AM +, Lumin wrote:
> > I agree, debconf configuration is a good compromise.
>
> Thank you everyone for your attention. I agree to use debconf
> too and it looks like the best solution to the disagreements
> in previous discussions. The mechanism
Dear Innocent,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 09:26:48AM +0200, Innocent De Marchi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It seems that nobody is available to review and upload the new version
> of the librecad package [0].
I actually sent a message about your sponsorship request, but you never replied:
Hello guys,
> I agree, debconf configuration is a good compromise.
Thank you everyone for your attention. I agree to use debconf
too and it looks like the best solution to the disagreements
in previous discussions. The mechanism was implemented in
the packaging lately.
The user will be asked
Hi everyone,
It seems that nobody is available to review and upload the new version
of the librecad package [0].
If no one is available in a few days, I will put an RFS in the BTS.
Regards!
I. De Marchi
[0]https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2018/03/msg00055.html
> Hello everyone,
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
