Re: RFS: gfan
On 12/3/20 4:41 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: No problem, please fix it and let me know. Regards Anton On 12/3/20 10:24 PM, Torrance, Douglas wrote: Thanks, Anton! Some of the builds are failing after one of my changes, so I'll likely be making another sponsorship request again soon. :) The package should be in good shape now. I just went back to what we used to do and skip the test that gives different results on different architectures. I also fixed up a couple more things. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/gfan Would you be able to review/sponsor again? Thanks! Doug OpenPGP_0xD12B2BE26D3FF663.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: gfan
Thanks, Anton! Some of the builds are failing after one of my changes, so I'll likely be making another sponsorship request again soon. :) Doug On 12/3/20 3:34 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: OK, uploaded! Thanks for contribution! Best regards Anton On 11/22/20 4:57 AM, Torrance, Douglas wrote: Hello! Would anyone be able to review and sponsor a new upload of gfan? Among other things, it fixes a failing autopkgtest on 32-bit architectures [1]. https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/gfan Thanks! Doug [1] https://bugs.debian.org/974558 OpenPGP_0xD12B2BE26D3FF663.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: gfan
No problem, please fix it and let me know. Regards Anton On 12/3/20 10:24 PM, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > Thanks, Anton! > > Some of the builds are failing after one of my changes, so I'll likely > be making another sponsorship request again soon. :) > > Doug > OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: gfan
OK, uploaded! Thanks for contribution! Best regards Anton On 11/22/20 4:57 AM, Torrance, Douglas wrote: > Hello! > > Would anyone be able to review and sponsor a new upload of gfan? Among > other things, it fixes a failing autopkgtest on 32-bit architectures [1]. > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/gfan > > Thanks! > Doug > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/974558
Re: MeshLab update ready to review/sponsor
Update: Thanks very much to a responsive and helpful upstream, my patch to adjust the build system again was accepted, so for sure 2021.01 will be easy to package. If someone wants to package 2020.12 sooner, they should grab a git snapshot after this point: https://github.com/cnr-isti-vclab/meshlab/commit/b3d10763863a216adf581e6a771cbae66e03648f There is docs in the get-orig-sources.sh script on how to pull a commit hash instead of a tag. Ryan On 12/1/2020 5:24 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: > Hello Debian scientists! > > I have completed the update of the MeshLab package to 2020.09, which was > the latest upstream release before this morning. It is presently in > Salsa, ready for review and sponsorship: > > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/meshlab > > As is common with this project, upstream shuffled/added some bundled > deps, so the files-excluded list got updated as did the rest of the > copyright file, which was the bulk of the work. On the plus side, the > file now mostly is the same as the output of `cme update > dpkg-copyright`, which should reduce maintenance burden. > > I don't have time this week to look at 2020.12, released today, but it > does make our Files-Excluded work much harder through some build system > modification/re-org. I've opened some discussions with upstream about > these changes, and hopefully they'll revise them so we can have an > easier-to-package 2021.01, and maybe just skip 2020.12 entirely. > > This will fix https://bugs.debian.org/975157 - the lone bug, a FTBFS and > thus serious. > > I'd also like to acknowledge the help of Anton Gladky in getting the > previous 2020.06 release out. > > Thanks for your reviews and sponsorship! > > Ryan Pavlik > > (Apologies for my previous unreadable encrypted email: looks like I > accidentally encrypted the email to myself instead of signing it. I have > reverted my Thunderbird settings.) > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
transfer vowpal-wabbit under debian-science team?
Dear Team, would someone be interested to move https://packages.debian.org/sid/vowpal-wabbit under team maintenance and update (current upstream release is 8.9.0 and we have only 8.6.1 from 2018)? Cheers, -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
