Hi Anton (and Merry Christmas!),
On 12/25/20 5:06 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
I have uploaded the package into experimental.
Thank you! However, you uploaded an older draft of the package, still
based on the last stable upstream release, that was sitting in the
"debian/master" branch. I was hoping to get the version of the package
from the "debian/experimental" branch uploaded. No worries -- I should
have put it in the default branch. I went ahead merged it into
"debian/master" to avoid any further confusion.
However CI-pipelines are failing for the package [1].
Could you please have a look, whether the package really fails
to build or it is a CI-issue?
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/macaulay2/-/pipelines/211610
It was a CI issue. I've managed to get it building again by fiddling
with the gbp settings. (Upstream keeps some of the source in a
submodule, and we need to make sure that it gets initialized and that
we're using the orig tarball from the pristine-tar branch that has those
files already.) I expect that the CI builds will time out, as Salsa
seems to have everything capped at 3 hours. However, Macaulay2 usually
takes over 4 hours to build!
The package also failed to build on a number of buildds (e.g., [1]) due
a bug where the string "none required" was getting inserted into LIBS,
causing g++ to throw an error when it tried linking. Fortunately, that
was already fixed upstream before the beta release [2], so I expect that
things should go more smoothly next time. :)
Would you be able to try another upload when you get a chance?
Thanks!
Doug
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=macaulay2=all=1.16%2Bgit55.94c4b7d%2Bds-2%7Eexp1=1608935000=0
[2] https://github.com/Macaulay2/M2/commit/6e10663c
OpenPGP_0xD12B2BE26D3FF663.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature