Great, thank you Anton, I don't think I would have figured that out! This
should be extremely helpful for future maintenance.
regards,
Steve
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021, 10:27 PM Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I have disabled i386 build [1] and reduced the size of salsa-build
> binaries [2].
> Now it builds fine in pipeline and I have uploaded the package.
>
> [1]
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/commit/8aca640c2743655e87aa181ddfd153f51e6f58e7
> [2]
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/commit/9a836cee37a46e20721ab33871f55b54e6e953dc
>
> Best regards
>
> Anton
>
> Am Sa., 23. Jan. 2021 um 14:48 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair
> :
> >
> > Hi Anton,
> >
> > Thanks, last time I tried to use the salsa pipeline for this package,
> > it was not possible because the build produced too much log output and
> > failed for that reason.
> > It seems that in your attempt, it actually makes it all the way to the
> > end; I'm actually not clear on what "fails", it actually succeeds
> > building and testing the package, but ends with,
> >
> > > Uploading artifacts as "archive" to coordinator... failed
> > > context=artifacts-uploader error=invalid argument
> >
> > I have no idea what arguments to what program are invalid here, but it
> > seems to have to do with the pipeline process and not the package
> > itself.
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/jobs/1367137
> >
> > For the i386 build, it fails unfortunately simply because the machine
> > runs out of memory. (The build annoyingly requires upwards of 7 GB of
> > memory while compiling the SWIG bindings; part of the motivation for
> > wanting to distribute a pre-compiled package!) However to be honest I
> > am not sure siconos works properly on 32-bit architectures anyway.
> > https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/jobs/1367138
> >
> > As for other architectures, there is a bug on arm64 that I have been
> > trying to fix but it is not an easy one. In the meantime the package
> > is very useful for x86_64 users, who are in the majority.
> >
> > regards,
> > Steve
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 10:36 PM Anton Gladky wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Stephen,
> > >
> > > I have enabled the salsa-pipeline on siconos package and it seems
> > > fails to build currently [1]. Could you please take a look and let me
> know,
> > > whether it is ready to be uploaded.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > [1] https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/siconos/-/pipelines
> > >
> > > Anton
> > >
> > > Am Mi., 20. Jan. 2021 um 22:46 Uhr schrieb Stephen Sinclair
> > > :
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > If there still is time, there is a minor version upstream update to
> > > > the siconos package looking for a sponsor:
> > > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/siconos/
> > > >
> > > > siconos (4.3.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > > .
> > > >* New upstream release.
> > > >* Rebase patches:
> > > > + Remove upstreamed patch to FindLAPACK.cmake.
> > > >* Update policy version 4.5.1.
> > > >* Update debhelper version 13.
> > > >* Add missing symbols for numerics.
> > > >* Change architecture for siconos and siconos-mechanics-tools to
> all.
> > > >* Add debian/upstream/metadata.
> > > >* Replace debian/compat with debhelper-compat package.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Steve
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 9:27 PM Anton Gladky
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear members of Debian Science Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some
> > > > > packages to be sponsored, please let us know.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a very limited time, but I will try to review/sponsor someof
> > > > > packages.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Anton
> > > > >
>
