On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
group maintenance in our BTS. For instance I did so with texmaker.
s/BTS/Vcs/
Andreas.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 15 Jun 2008, Giovanni Marco Dall'Olio wrote:
I still don't understand well how to use debian science's resources.
Well, you can use Debian Science perfectly as you are using Debian
because it is a completely internal project and is nothing else
than Debian itself. We just felt a need
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008, Giovanni Marco Dall'Olio wrote:
A draft for such a section could be:
...
Sounds good. BTW, I'd go for a real Wiki page instead of drafts here on
this list. A wiki is a wiki is a wiki - just use it and don't be too shy. ;-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
For example http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks/physics.php lists
packages to do Finite element analysis, optical simulation, xray
absorption spectroscopy, ab inito quantum mechanics and computer algebra.
I propose to post to this list or the
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
For example, the link for salome is http://www.debian.org/Bugs/#457075
when it should be
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457075
Ahh, good catch: It's just the '#' which has to be removed from the
template. Just testing it and will
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/science/tasks_new/statistics.html lists a
science-mathematics meta-package. Is this intentional or a bug?
Well, not really a bug, but also not the final intention. The problem
becomes even more visible in:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I think I'll wishlist it to debian-science...
Damn, you were even faster than me and I've thought I would have been
quick. ;-))
Well, to get this done we should release current SVN status as
debian-science 0.2 soon because we will face some delay
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
It's not missing any more.
Thank you!
You are welcome. ;-))
OK, so you would like to propose to move these two prospective package
entries from physics to engineering?
I think this would make sense.
Done.
Done as libmesh0.6.2 (hmmm, I have
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
Am I missing something, or packages can't be in more than one category/task in
this system?
There is no reason thich prevents having a package in several tasks. Installing
a metapackage for a task should give you a complete working environment to
Hi,
for ITPs that might interest Debian Med I would now go and add this
ITP to the tasks file in question. Any volunteeer to do this for
Debian Science and add this entry as prospective package to electronics?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-- Forwarded
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
So the purpose of the meta package is to list packages that a
physicist will use, and not to classify physics packages. That makes
sense - and I'd previously missed that.
I can then ask my sysadmin to install the physics metapackge safe in
the knowledge
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
What is the purpose of Debian Science -- isn't it better to join the two teams?
Well, Debian Science is a little bit more than just packaging and the
scope is wider than just computing. If you look at the tasks page
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
It was me who wrote this wiki, as I thought that the
DebianScientificComputingTeam was the only scientific team in Debian.
Now that I learned that there are two, I think the purpose of Debian
Science team could be to cover sort of everything, as you
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Ondrej Certik wrote:
It seems to me that all I need are quality packages and also make them
work together. But maybe some other people need more also.
If you are using Debian for 7 years you will need not much more. Try
to convince a not-yet Debian user ...
I like the
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Done.
Thanks!
(Hope I got the format right.)
Nearly. ;-)
I just reduced the number of blanks in the long description to one to avoid
verbatim rendering.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hi Frederic (and others),
I just want to mention that in the log file
/srv/alioth.debian.org/chroot/home/groups/cdd/webtools/logs/debian-science.out
those packages are mentioned that have resolved ITP bugs and thus can be
removed from the prospective package list in the tasks files to
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
How do people see the role of the wiki pages? Are they a list of
packages people want packaged, and some indication of progress on the
packaging? Are they to give information to researchers in particular
subject areas on what packages are available? Are
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
So it seems somebody went forth with this, at least there is now a
science-chemistry package I never heard about before. So far, I
understood the nice task web pages as just some aggregation of packages
based on debtags or other criteria, and was not
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 07:03:58PM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
=== Structure calculation ===
Abinitio
Semi Empirical
=== Molecular graphics ===
So we would have four categories for DebiChem?
Certainly the chemistry stuff
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
I've requested to be added to the cdd alioth project now.
I did this yesterday. Just tell me if you have any trouble
(either in private or here on this list, alternatively
on debichem list while keeping me on cc - I do not read
Debichem list)
OK,
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
Science and pkg-scicomp and the possible actions to take (for example
merge pkg-scicomp into Debian Science)
I would be in favour of a merge. It is not very wise to have two projects
whithout reason (especially if the protagonists of one of
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
We have the following, as far as I can tell:
biology - debian-med
chemistry - debichem, with some in debian-med and debian-science
ACK (for both, even if the scope of debian-med contains more than only
Biology).
physics - (?, right now pkg-scicomp
On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
There is also some stuff around Wikipedia. My main motto: let's not
reinvent the wheel.
ACK. An please try to avoid making a science of it how to classify
packages. It might be a really interesting topic but I would not be
happy if this is
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
There are also some interesting categories that don't correspond to
debian-science metapackages. Specifically Vector drawing tools, plot
digitizers (for extracting numbers from data you only have as a
graph), and distributed computing tools. Also,
Hi,
I would like to hear opinons about the new naming proposal given at
http://wiki.debian.org/CDDNamingProposals#head-7bb1ae330046f9d0720b77e76d6ee7aa992
b754f
So I think we should go on renaming waht formerly used to be
Custom Debian Distributions to
Debian Integrated Solutions
Hi,
I would like to hear opinons about the new naming proposal given at
http://wiki.debian.org/CDDNamingProposals#head-7bb1ae330046f9d0720b77e76d6ee7aa992b754f
So I think we should go on renaming waht formerly used to be
Custom Debian Distributions to
Debian Integrated Solutions
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Ruben Molina wrote:
The attached patch should incorporate the Jonas' NMU, add a Recommends
on ghostscript (gs-* are dummy packages) and, fix LaTeX spelling to get
a lintian clean package.
Ruben, thanks for your patch.
I think we should upload texmaker soon but I would like
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Ruben Molina wrote:
$ who-uploads texmaker
Uploads for texmaker:
1.7.1-2.1 to unstable: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ups, you are right - I was working on a not updated package cache.
Sorry for the confusion. I will try to revert my changes, inject
the upload in SVN
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Backports are unofficial by nature. If you choose to make some packaging
backport-friendly then you go beyond the logic of official Debian
packaging, and lintian hinting no longer applies.
In other words: Don't blindly follow lintian hints if you
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I did intend to convert to Git and co-maintain (and surprised that I
can't find any traces of beginnings of that Git conversions on my
machine). But now I come to think about it, I'd rather not: I do not
currently use TeX at all, might explore it some
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I'm not quite sure what you are looking for, as I do not know
CrystalMaker, but here are some proposals based on the
education-chemistry task for visualizing molecules:
http://viewmol.sourceforge.net/
http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Carlo Segre wrote:
As someone else mentioned, Jmol is a good choice too but there was only an
unoffical Debian package which is 3 years out of date and not on the
http://debian.wgdd.de/debian site any longer. I do have that package if you
are interested but I have not
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Ji ZhengYu wrote:
I have an advice, remove this link
http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/edu/tasks/chemistry.html
^^^
because I think it's spare. Why we need this if there is a much more
complete source in
Hi once more to all related lists,
my suggestion for a new name received a lot of comments and it turned
out that I got not so much positive reactions on the mailing list than
when discussing it with people at DebConf. The consequence of the
discussion of the debian-custom mailing list was that
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
So we decided to remove all votes from the
current ballot next Monday morning
This happened now because nobody showe up who found a way to change
a vote on doodle.
and start voting again about
the suggestions which are known at this point in time
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
I was wondering if there are some presentation of Debian Science and the
Octave team available, and in particular information like the following
http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_science/
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Robotics - which doesn't
exist. Is there somewhere more appropriate for it to point?
I think that Andreas should do something to add in the wiki, but I'm not sure.
I will definitely not create a page I
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
Once the poll is restarted from scratch no additional name suggestions
will be accepted. The new name will be in the set specified inside
the poll.
People several times criticised that this type of poll is inferior
to a condorset voting method
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
No. I think they should be included in the task package, but I'm a
physicist and don't want to force my opinion on chemists.
Ah, OK.
In addition to the task packages, I'd like to see a categorised list
something like
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
1. Create tasks files and cdd-dev stuff under
svn://svn.debian.org/cdd/projects/debichem/trunk/debichem/
(or whatever name you prefer)
-- I volunteer to do this provided somebody takes over the
categorisation work
2.
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
Thanks, I've now extended it a bit and shuffled things around.
Fine. I might turn this into tasks files at end of October.
(I'm offline next week and at OSWC the week after with less
chances to do such work.)
My previous opinion still holds - some
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Sure. So, to summarize, we have the following options:
1. The references are added to the long description
2. The references are added to Packages via a new X-* field
3. The references are added to debian/copyright
4. The references are
On Sat, 18 Oct 2008, Andreas Tille wrote:
would just want to note that your prefered choice is the option that
makes the implementation on the tasks page the hardest amongst all
the options. I do not see this as an unresolvable problem but it delays
the implementation the most.
... sorry
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
we will warmly welcome swarm in our repository, but since it seems to
have a broader scope that just medecine and biology, I recommend to
check before on debian-science@lists.debian.org if some people would
prefer to co-maintain it there.
I
Hi,
I'm wondering whether this might be another target for a category
Simulation.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:57:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Johannes Ring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Scott Christley wrote:
(http://www.swarm.org
) which is an agent-based simulation toolkit that I would like to
package into Debian. It was suggested that I email this list as
debian-science has a broader view. I looked through the metapackages
listed on the wiki, but its
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
You replied to a message more than a week old, and missed an option
which came up last week, see below.
I was offline for two weeks with a small window in between where
I most probably missed something.
Option 5 doesn't delay implementation at
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
If you were to put the software first - eg apbs:Baker2001, tab
completion of the reference would be easier as I'm more likely to
remember the name of the software than the name of the author.
I have no strong opinion about this - but considering that
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 12:10:14AM +0100, Chris Walker wrote:
I have added almost all[1] the science-chemistry packages to the
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Chemistry page. I have done some
categorisation of them, but mainly from their
Hi,
I'm proud to announce a new QA tool for all CDD^W Blends: Overview about
all bugs about Dependencies of our metapackages. For the impatient here
is a list of these pages:
Edu: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/edu/bugs
GIS: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/gis/bugs
Jr:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Egon Willighagen wrote:
DebiChem: http://cdd.alioth.debian.org/debichem/bugs
as well.
Very nice overview! I really like this.
Thanks.
One thing I miss (wishlist), is a link to a page indicating which
packages belong to which task... particularly, where do I find
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
It is, however, mathematical software, marginally useful, and it
doesn't have a large footprint, so I wouldn't mind having it as a
mathematics task (this is tasksel we're talking about, right?).
I think we talk about integration into the
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
That's true, though if the although a normal bug fixed The reason IYes, that's
true. The rationale behind suggesting it was that it
... ups this paragraph is unfinished ...
After lenny is released would be a better time to tune the number - at
the
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
I did wonder about suggesting:
AB C
wishlist: 11 1
minor: 23 4
normal:49 16
important: 8 27 64
serious: 16 81256
grave:32 243 1024
critical: 64 729 4096
ie one normal bug is
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
What about the projects at http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/LiveCD
? What features are most important that aren't available yet?
What I meant to say is that it looks like the debian-live effort is
active and will release DVDs with lenny. Is anyone
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Hamish wrote:
feel free to edit the wiki page; the geography meta-package is already
listed:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis/PackageList
(not all packages on that list are included in tasks)
Anybody cares to maintain the tasks files? Any reason for not touching the
On Tue, 8 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
Depends: g3data
Done in SVN.
Other packages - yes, Steffen Moeller's suggestion of qtdmm sounds
appropriate.
Done in SVN.
On the physics wiki page, I list
libgpib (boris)
Suggests: libgpib-bin
libcomedi (boris)
Depends: ktimetrace
and
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
A whole area of science that depend on image analyses (from microscopic
to astronomics) might like to include different programs to control
cameras. Some ideas:
In general I like the idea to give the whole bunch of image acquistion
programs some
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
Indeed. The big advantage of the wiki is the ease with which anyone
can edit it and categorise things themselves
Could you please have a look at the WIki Changelog who actually did
the last ten edits. (No, I did not checked, but I wild guess there
are
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
There might be some merit in an ImageAnalysis task as well (or
perhaps instead).
Yes. Just provide perhaps three package dependencies for this task
and I will create the according tasks file - or just create it yourself
according to the given template
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
Libcv1 - a computer vision library
What do you want to tell me by this?
This is for image analysis - and so should probably go alongside Gpiv
- in an image acquisition/analysis metapackage.
OK, one dependency for imageanalysis. Any more?
gpsd -
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Carlo Segre wrote:
So why do you hesitate to upload?
Primarily because the documentation is not complete and there are a couple of
final issues in the packaging that need to straightened out. The
documentation will take a long time so it should probably not be a
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Stuart Prescott wrote:
I'll put you on Responsible for this project in the tasks page ...
Sure. (Gee, I walked right in to that one, didn't I!?)
Fine.
Any hint how to link to the Ububtu package?
There's no ubuntu package (there may be unofficial ones floating around
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Agreed, I find that in particular very irritating. How are we to
communicate information about our packages to Ubuntu science folk? It's
not at all clear where to email such info other than said mailing list,
but I also have never been able to get
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Thibaut wrote:
I believe Yorick should be there too.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/yorick
Rationale: it's an interpreted language à la IDL/GDL, many people use this
for analysing data, including images (e.g. astronomical).
From the description (apt-cache show yorick)
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Jordan Mantha wrote:
...
I think that is largely the state of afairs. Morten has done excellent
work and I've shifted essentially all my scientific packaging pursuits
to Debian Science and Debchem. I even became a DM to help do as much
work as I'm able to in Debian with the
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Charles Plessy wrote:
I do not know if it has been well advertised, but we also can have links to
Ubuntu bugs from Debian:
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.orgubuntu=1ordering=3
It is in fact not that well advertised
Hi,
as it was requested on the debian-science mailing list [1] we
should provide in addition to our tasks pages a short overview
about the packages as Ubuntu Science is doing[2]. I roughly
implemented this feature for all Blends. It is available at
the following locations:
Debian Edu:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
I do not know if there are libraries without any -dev packages. Having a
library package installing development files seems like bad packaging
practice to me.
It's not all about libraries. Have a look at
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
I don't feel the description fully captures what I want it to say, so
suggestions for improvement appreciated. The name is not set in stone
either.
Looks good.
...
Depends: gnudatalanguage
Why: numerical programming environment compatible with IDL
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Chris Walker wrote:
A significant number of packages, including pdl, also lack a homepage
field. I have been holding off filing these bugs until lenny is
released (but maybe I should file them now).
Same thing wis Homepage field: When I started with the tasks pages I
Hi,
thanks to a hint from Helge Kreutzmann I had a look at ESPResSo++
http://espresso.scai.fraunhofer.de/
Extensible Simulation Package for Research on Soft matter
ESPResSo is a highly versatile software package for the scientific
simulation and analysis of coarse-grained atomistic or
To: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
Subject: Bug#512069: Acknowledgement (ITP: r-cran-plotrix -- GNU R package
providing various plotting functions)
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message
Hi,
as you can read in my lightning talk at DebConf
http://people.debian.org/~tille/talks/200808_lightning/
I did some investigation on who is frequently posting
on our mailing lists. I now created graphs until
end of last year and write a short summary for
those lists I regard worth a
.
Any comment is welcome
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:57:32 +0100
From: Andreas Tille til...@rki.de
To: Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: ITP: r-cran-colorspace -- GNU R Color Space Manipulation
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Brett Viren wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats/authorstat_science.pdf
It is interesting work.
Thanks. BTW, according to some request of debian-user-german I
cropped the surname to one letter to regard some data privacy.
If you want suggestions, it would
On Wed, 20 Jan 2009, Chris Walker wrote:
If the traffic from the top 10 contributors is representative,
In small groups like this I think it is. The stat definitely removes
SPAM which is included in a plain summary.
then
debian-science has taken off. I think this is a good thing. Hopefully
On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote:
... how you come to the idea to dictate a
policy?!?!?! And: *If* we (all the teams and maintainers) ever agree on
one mailing list, then it will definitely not be an Alioth list.
debian-science exists.
I understand the RFC as an attempt to find a
[debian-custom in CC because it is strongly related]
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Daniel Baumann wrote:
it would be nice if you could add a science-all meta-package that
depends on all science-* meta packages. That would make live-cd building
a bit easier in future, as nobody would need to 'maintain'
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote:
PS: I don't care, if guys at debian-science.alioth.d.o write a Debian
Science Policy. I can imagine a lot of topics for such a policy (for
users, authors and packagers) trying to help the effort of Debian
Science and I will happily throw my ideas into
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Ross Boylan wrote:
I haven't been following closely enough to know the purpose, but
potentially every R package is (or could be imagined to be) is
statistical.
Sure. But for instance I'm rather busy packaging r-surveillance
and other R tools for use in epidemiology.
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
At any rate, which one do I need to join to upload an updated cimg-dev
version without NMUing?
$ apt-cache show cimg-dev | grep Maintainer
Maintainer: Debian Scientific Computing Team
pkg-scicomp-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
But without
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Chris Walker wrote:
This list may or may not be of interest-
http://heybryan.org/mediawiki/index.php/Comp_chem_linkdump
I've added it to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/OtherLinks and
the chemistry wiki page. It would be more useful if it had information
Would you
Hi,
this is not yet an official announcement but I would like
all those who might try to commit any changes - especially
those concerning tasks files for Debian Jr, Debian Science
and Debian Med - to the SVN repository that this has been
moved now. We are approaching the final phase of the
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Manuel Prinz wrote:
If you have a look at the lenny-only list [1], they're not listed. But
thanks for caring!
Ditto.
On an aside, would it be a good thing to have such email of RC bugs in
scientific packages on a regular basis (e.g. monthly)? I guess it is not
too hard
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Chris Walker wrote:
* Package name: pymca
[snip]
I've added it to the science-physics task.
Great.
Prelimary packages will be soon at the Debian Science repository
at git.debian.org.
When it is, if you let me know I'll add that information to the task too.
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
Do you thing that it could be possible to move this repository into the
debian-science git repository.
Sure, why not?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Chris Walker wrote:
s/Vcs-Snv/Vcs-Svn/
Thanks.
Also, it might be useful to link back to where the syntax of these
fields is defined - and how the use in blends is different (if at
all).
Done. There is no difference (which I know of - and there should not be).
mlpost
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Manuel Prinz wrote:
This would be really nice! As for Git, there are two things to concider:
First, we probably need to agree to the name of the branch in which the
debian/ files exist: some use master, some debian, or whatever seems
to fit. Second, one has to consider that
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Chris Walker wrote:
Another closely related thing is to use the watch file results to post
a list of packages that are out of date compared to upstream. debichem
has done this already I think.
There is currently some discussion on debian-qa list about including
watch file
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Frank Küster wrote:
OHURA Makoto oh...@debian.org wrote:
Package: wnpp
Owner: OHURA Makoto oh...@debian.org
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pgfplots
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Christian Feuersanger
* URL or Web page :
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
pgfplots will be in
texlive-pictures
since it can be found there in TL (collection-pictures), and this is
also the place where pgf and other pgf related packages are
(pgf-soroban, pgfopts, tikz-inet9).
That makes sense.
But if you package
Hi,
this is probably a good target for Debian Science. WHich tasks
would you suggest to add it?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:47:20 +0100
From: Dominique Belhachemi domi...@cs.tu-berlin.de
To:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Dominique Belhachemi wrote:
Z88 belongs now to the engineering section. ;-)
Many thanks for just adding it to the tasks file. ;-)
ANdreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi,
this seems like a nce target for Debian Science Mathematics
section. Petr, do you consider putting the package under
Debian Science team maintenance?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Petr Pudlak d...@pudlak.name
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
yes, I thought that it would be a good idea, but I couldn't find exact
guidelines how
to do it. (Maybe it's just because I'm a bit tired after spending the whole
weekend
reading Debian documentation.)
I can package eprover according to
Hi Jan,
this might be an interesting add on for Debian Science Viewing task.
Would you consider group maintenance in the Debian Science team?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Jan Hendrik den Besten wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Hendrik den Besten
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Jan Hendrik den Besten wrote:
Fudgit would be my first package to maintain. I feel I must gain some
experience in that first - before I take up other tasks.
Well, nobody is forcing you to join a team - you are perfectly free
to do so. But I feel some inconsitency in your
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
as I was suggested, I'm looking for a sponsor for the eprover package,
who would help me with publishing the package.
If you are seeking for a sponsor it is a clever idea to post the
URL to your *.dsc file to enable others to evaluate your
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Petr Pudlak (Debian) wrote:
dget -u http://petr.pudlak.name/deb/eprover_1.0.004-1.dsc
I had a short look onto your work and would like to give some
comments. At first you obviousely did a good job to create a
lintian clean package of a complex software! Considering that
101 - 200 of 1756 matches
Mail list logo
