[RFS] Meshlab

The current version has some FTBFS, some DFSG issues, as well as an issue with installing but not actually running. I've prepared an updated version, which has a newer upstream (release instead of snapshot) that has been repacked to exclude the DFSG-problematic files, and that is also overall

Re: [RFS] Meshlab

ve a look at your changes within > the next few days. > > Regards > > > Anton > > Am Mo., 16. März 2020 um 17:14 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik > : >> >> The current version has some FTBFS, some DFSG issues, as well as an >> issue with installing but not

MeshLab package ready for review and sponsorship

Hello all! I've finished up the most recent MeshLab release (2020.06) and it's now on Mentors ready to upload. https://mentors.debian.net/package/meshlab It's also on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/meshlab Thank you! Ryan Pavlik signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

MeshLab update ready to review/sponsor

just skip 2020.12 entirely. This will fix https://bugs.debian.org/975157 - the lone bug, a FTBFS and thus serious. I'd also like to acknowledge the help of Anton Gladky in getting the previous 2020.06 release out. Thanks for your reviews and sponsorship! Ryan Pavlik (Apologies for my previous

Re: MeshLab update ready to review/sponsor

/meshlab/commit/b3d10763863a216adf581e6a771cbae66e03648f There is docs in the get-orig-sources.sh script on how to pull a commit hash instead of a tag. Ryan On 12/1/2020 5:24 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: > Hello Debian scientists! > > I have completed the update of the MeshLab package to 2020.

...

binvaQ9sEjV5W.bin Description: PGP/MIME version identification encrypted.asc Description: OpenPGP encrypted message

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

being used, the export will appear to work fine but will hit a javascript error on usage. I'd be interested to learn how to write up the test to catch this, if anybody has ideas. Thanks! Ryan On 1/19/2021 5:57 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote: > Anton, > > Thanks for taking the time to update that pa

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

eck > the pipelines and I will upload > it into the experimental. > > Best regards > > Anton > > Am Do., 21. Jan. 2021 um 18:10 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik > : >> Update: I re-did it calling it 3.0.rc2+repack1 since the ~ ended up >> breaking piuparts on CI. It's just a

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

RM mode > > So I requested the removal of the package on this platform. > If somebody has an advice how to fix this special assembler-problem, > please let me know. > > Best regards > > Anton > > > Anton > > > Am Do., 14. Jan. 2021 um 00:33 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavli

Re: Sponsoring of packages for the next stable release

On 1/9/2021 2:27 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > Dear members of Debian Science Team, > > we are approaching to a new stable release freeze. If youhave some > packages to be sponsored, please let us know. > > I have a very limited time, but I will try to review/sponsor someof > packages. > > > Best

SolveSpace update ready for review and sponsor

also added lintian overrides for the false-positive checks, which does leave a few info/warning messages active, so I have a few things to improve in the future. However, it would be good to get this in. I did mostly test on Bullseye so it actually should be backportable easily too. Thank you! Ryan Pavlik

Request for sponsorship - SolveSpace 3.1

Hello all, I've updated the team-maintained SolveSpace package following the recent upstream release, and have pushed it to mentors as well as updated on salsa. The previous RC1 upload's migration to testing is stuck behind an autopkgtest s390x regression I can't reproduce, and that isn't seen

RFS: solvespace/3.1+ds1-2 [RC] [Team] -- Parametric 2d/3d CAD

. Ryan Pavlik

Re: RFS: solvespace/3.1+ds1-2 [RC] [Team] -- Parametric 2d/3d CAD

gh to get the package into the archive. > You have to request the binary removal from the archive on a specific > arch, filling the bug against ftp.debian.org. > > Best regards > > Anton > > > Am Mo., 19. Sept. 2022 um 21:00 Uhr schrieb Ryan Pavlik > : >> >> Hel

MeshLab update, help wanted

Hey all, I've updated the MeshLab package to their latest release. I have also updated the copyright file, which was one of the things I didn't get to last time I poked the package. It's still failing CI, but I think it's just a missing Lintian override, if I understand right. (It has a private

Sponsorship needed for SolveSpace

Hello all! It looks like the previous "fix" for the s390x test failures, inadvertently excluded other arches as well and thus still didn't unblock the migration - see https://bugs.debian.org/1025311 I have prepared an updated revision (and pushed it to salsa and mentors) that fixes this right