On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 16:52 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Finally the license statement is all about redistribution ... and
> than upstream says: Do not redistribute.
They appear to be fine with redistribution, just not with wide
distribution by a popular Linux distribution, which has a stable
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 08:09 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I think I will open an ITP for this package
...
> I also intend to negotiate this again.
It seems unlikely that upstream will have changed their mind, it
was only a few months ago when we had the discussion with them.
--
bye,
pabs
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 06:21 +, M. Zhou wrote:
> the upstream holds a very negative attitude towards debian packaging.
> https://github.com/explosion/cython-blis/issues/32
I suggest you cease packaging this and anything that depends on it.
The developers reference mentions that packaging
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gensim
Version : 3.8.3
Upstream Author : Radim Řehůřek and others
* URL : https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pyemd
Version : 0.5.1
Upstream Author : Will Mayner and others
* URL : https://github.com/wmayner/pyemd
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: nmslib
Version : 2.0.6
Upstream Author : Bilegsaikhan Naidan and others
* URL : https://github.com/nmslib/nmslib
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Wise
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: morfessor
Version : 2.0.6
Upstream Author : Morpho project at Aalto University, Finland
* URL : http://morpho.aalto.fi
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 19:55 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> My employer is interested in having spaCy and gensim in Debian.
>
> https://spacy.io/
Due to the hostility of Explosion AI towards spaCy and thinc being
available in the Debian archive, my employer has decided to stop
working on thi
On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 02:26 +, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Both NLTK and spaCy suffer from a problem -- they cannot be fully
> functional without pretrained models. And you know this is exactly
> what the ML-Policy is discussing.
Yes, I discovered this while doing the internal packaging. The default
Hi all,
My employer is interested in having spaCy and gensim in Debian.
https://spacy.io/
https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/
I noticed that there is a spaCy package in the team's repository
although it is not yet in Debian and gensim is also a natural language
processing tool so the team seems
On Tue, 2019-05-21 at 03:14 -0700, Mo Zhou wrote:
> They are added to the case study section.
Are there any other case studies we could add?
Has anyone repeated the training of Mozilla DeepSpeech for example?
Are deep learning models deterministically and reproducibly trainable?
If I re-train
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 3:11 PM Mo Zhou wrote:
> I'd better write a draft and shed some light on a safety
> area. Then here is the first humble attempt:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/lumin/deeplearning-policy
The policy looks good to me.
A couple of situations this related to this policy:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I remember these messages in connection with some (other?) package on
> autobuilders but I can't make up my mind which one and I'm obviously
> doing the wrong web search queries.
I don't know enough about OpenMPI and the logs you posted
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:07 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Is there any hint how this test can be run on the autopkgtest
> hardware?
It is unlikely any buildd, puiparts host or debci host has a GPU.
Often they are virtual machines with only serial console for input if
any. So the safe bet for
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I am trying to write a watch file suitable for fetching tarballs from a
> *link* published on a GitHub release page [1]. It seems this link
> points to a different location on Amazon S3 [2].
For the arrayfire-full tarballs:
version=3
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> The package in question (casacore) wants them in a specific format "CASA
> table" (which is uniformly used within that package), and dependent
> packages access this in that specific format. The only way would be to
> create this table from
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Ole Streicher wrote:
> We have the problem (I am not sure whether I posted about this already),
> that the "casacore" package needs additional "casacore-data-XXX"
> packages, providing the basic data to work with casacore. Some of the
> data are almost immutable,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Peter Colberg wrote:
> This package replaces the embedded copy of dSFMT in the julia package, and
> is suited to substitute embedded copies in the xmds2 and shogun packages.
Please have the embedded copies documented:
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
Hi folks,
apertium has been removed from Debian stretch due to the PCRE bug, is
there going to be an apertium release containing the fix? If there is,
please upload it to Debian unstable.
https://bugs.debian.org/767069
Also, it would be nice to see more languages packaged.
--
bye,
pabs
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:59 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I'm scheduling the binNMUs now, but I'd rather keep an RC bug open
against apertium (and possibly tag it jessie-ignore).
Great, thanks.
Filed #767069, please tag it jessie-ignore as it is unlikely pcre3 will
change incompatibly during
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 09:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
I don't think a proper fix is going to happen before the freeze so can
we have the binNMUs so that apertium works in jessie?
So it is now too late to easily fix this issue for jessie. In addition
some language pairs got removed due to RC bugs
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
- You are trying to close the ITP bug in an historic changelog
paragraph (0.12.2-Source-1). This does not work. Bugs can only
be closed in recent changelog entries (here is also the answer why
this information is not parsed
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Christian Holm Christensen wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 21:08 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
The file is here:
https://github.com/upverter/ADMS/blob/master/admsXml/constants.vams
I do not believe it is copyrightable.
Who has the copyright doesn't really
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-pyephem
Upstream Author : Brandon Craig Rhodes
* URL : http://rhodesmill.org/pyephem/
* License : GPL/LGPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
As I will have to remove an entire directory, containing a module, its
parent directory contains a CMakeLists.txt file containing
'add_subdirectory(subdir_containing_non_free_files)'
My question is: do I have to provide a patch in
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
Is that so? Does that not discriminate against one group, the US
government?
It is just stating that the USA government acquisition regulations
apply to government use/etc of the work. It has about the same effect
as the statement copyright
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
I am building debian packages of FreeFOAM and come across the following
license statement in
./applications/utilities/postProcessing/graphics/ensightFoamReader/global_extern.h:
* Copyright 1998 Computational Engineering
Hi Jerome,
Would it be possible for you to get the ESRF added to our list of users?
http://www.debian.org/users/#submissions
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 20:12 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Paul Wise wrote:
Does Debian have any space related software?
Yes.
Do you know of any specific packages?
There is this:
http://sophia.estec.esa.int/socis2011/org_admin_mentor_agreement
3
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Maxime Chatelle m...@gmx.com wrote:
This annonce may be interresting. :)
It's a gsoc-like, but by european space agency.
http://sophia.estec.esa.int/socis2011/
Does Debian have any space related software?
If so, perhaps the Debian science or gsoc folks are
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:21 AM, André Gaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://web-yard.de/user/public/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/debian/libalberta2_2.0.1-1.dsc
Since this is a library, it should probably use the new symbols files
feature, to make shlibs as minimal as possible and also to detect ABI
31 matches
Mail list logo
