On 2024-01-23 14:02, Kari Pahula wrote:
Hi, I requested access to
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ortools some time ago. Is
anyone available to process it?
I have a prospective (experimental) changes available at
https://salsa.debian.org/kaol/ortools. It requires versions of abseil
and
Hi, I requested access to
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ortools some time ago. Is
anyone available to process it?
I have a prospective (experimental) changes available at
https://salsa.debian.org/kaol/ortools. It requires versions of abseil
and protobuf from experimental, at least the
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 12:55:22PM +0200, Kari Pahula wrote:
> I've been looking at the new version of ortools 9.8 but looks like
> retaining Python support with it would take significant effort. The
Even with skipping Python support for now, the Abseil version in
unstable is currently too old.
On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 08:48:49PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> sure, welcome to team! it would be also good to fix RC bugs also there.
> Thanks!
I've been looking at the new version of ortools 9.8 but looks like
retaining Python support with it would take significant effort. The
new ortools
Hi,
sure, welcome to team! it would be also good to fix RC bugs also there. Thanks!
Regards,
Anton
Am Di., 2. Jan. 2024 um 20:15 Uhr schrieb Kari Pahula :
>
> Hi.
>
> As the maintainer of minizinc, I have an interest in ortools. I added
> ortools-flatzinc as rdep for it with a recent update
Hi.
As the maintainer of minizinc, I have an interest in ortools. I added
ortools-flatzinc as rdep for it with a recent update but noticed that
it's kind of unmaintained at the moment.
I can prepare an update with the newest upstream version and add
myself as an uploader.
6 matches
Mail list logo