HI Michael,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
Right now the Condor package only builds a fraction of the built-in
functionality (although what is built is already quite comprehensive
for
the task of a batch queuing system). I'm working on enabling
build-time
Hi,
some of you might still remember the Batch Queuing Systems BoF at
Debconf10, where we briefly discussed the past/present/future of this
software in Debian. We talked about the lack of maintainers, and possible
strategies to consolidate our efforts.
During this meeting I've learned about
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are
enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit
the issue.
I won't be there, either.
Note that the Grenoble workshop draft agenda
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:38:57PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
So having Condor certainly makes sense, but I think we have several
mature (from a upstream POV) batch queueing systems in Debian now, but
might lack maintenance personell.
For Condor the situation is very nice in the respect. They
On Thu, 10 May 2012 09:49:11 +0200
Michael Hanke m...@debian.org wrote:
Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are
enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit
the issue.
What is the status of similar software in Debian (GridEngine,
Michael Hanke m...@debian.org writes:
Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are
enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit
the issue.
I'll be at debconf in Managua, and I would certainly attend such a
BoF. I also have some interest in
6 matches
Mail list logo
