Hi Debian Science,
I just updated the Debian Science Policy. The changes address the feedback
that I got so far and are rather minor. The commit messages were sent to the
commit mailing list. You can read them there or update your repository clone.
Feedback is --as always-- welcome!
I'm sorry
* Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080528 23:28]:
I'm missing something explicit about general comitt rights/etiquette.
Good point, I really did not think about that all the way through. I
personally would be OK if someone from the team would make non-intrusive
changes, meaning something
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
a first draft of the Debian Science Policy is now available in the Debian
Science repository and can be checked out with:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/policy.git
Now I was able to read the proposal:
A list of packages has been
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/policy.git
Any tips for people sitting behind a firewall that only allows
html (via proxy) and who will get:
$ git clone
Hi Jordan,
thanks for the feedback!
Am Dienstag, den 27.05.2008, 16:10 -0700 schrieb Jordan Mantha:
I think the gatekeeper workflow is appropriate. However, packaging
the policy and using BTS seems like overkill. It would seem to me that
with git, sending patches or merging from somebody's
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 12:50 +0200 schrieb Manuel Prinz:
I will enable it and let you know.
Done, easier as expected. You can now also clone using:
git clone http://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/policy.git
Best regards
Manuel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 12:39 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Why not ... licensed under either GPL or BSD? This makes sure that
it might fit any license in case there is some conflict.
In my understanding the problem is not so much about conflicting license
but about mixing compatible
* Manuel Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080528 00:34]:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/policy.git
Besides the points mentioned in the document, the following points have to be
addressed:
1. What license should we use for the document?
Is there so much in the worth
Hi Andreas!
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 16:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
What I'm missing is a step by step introduction to git which answers
the questions:
1. How can I check out all existing repositories of packages
2. How can I create a new package repository (as I said I'm
Hi Bernhard,
thanks for your feedback!
Am Mittwoch, den 28.05.2008, 15:03 +0200 schrieb Bernhard R. Link:
* Manuel Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080528 00:34]:
1. What license should we use for the document?
Is there so much in the worth protectable? Otherwise making it public
domain or
On Wed, 28 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
I'll add a paragraph about that. We can also change it to Debhelper.
That's what is discussion is for: To find a consensus about that. At the
moment, it is just a suggestion.
I think: Suggesting / recommending tu use CDBS where it makes sense if
fine -
Hello Debian Science,
a first draft of the Debian Science Policy is now available in the Debian
Science repository and can be checked out with:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/policy.git
For easier reading, you should transform the document into XHTML. You can
simply run
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Manuel Prinz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Debian Science,
a first draft of the Debian Science Policy is now available in the Debian
Science repository and can be checked out with:
git clone git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/policy.git
Thanks for
Le Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Jordan Mantha a écrit :
There was only one spot where I had a question. In the debian/control
section it says that the Section field should be science. I can think of
a
lot of cases where a package would be in sections other than science.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Tue, May 27, 2008 at 04:10:18PM -0700, Jordan Mantha a écrit :
There was only one spot where I had a question. In the debian/control
section it says that the Section field should be science. I can
think of a
15 matches
Mail list logo
