RE: Distribution of non-GPL models with GPL Software (Was: [Qucs-devel] Closed bugs)

2013-06-17 Thread Getz, Robin
David Bremner wrote: [snip] Speaking only for my self, I don't see a problem with shipping DFSG-free [0] licensed data with GPL code. As long as the code runs fine without the models in question, I guess it is pretty clearly not linked. [quote of proposed license] Any changes beyond

RE: Distribution of non-GPL models with GPL Software (Was: [Qucs-devel] Closed bugs)

2013-06-16 Thread David Bremner
Getz, Robin robin.g...@analog.com writes: Adding the debian maintainer, and debian-science list to make sure there aren't distribution objections before I start verifying everything. Some background: I would like to include some vendor specific SPICE models with Qucs, which are not under

RE: Distribution of non-GPL models with GPL Software (Was: [Qucs-devel] Closed bugs)

2013-06-15 Thread Getz, Robin
Adding the debian maintainer, and debian-science list to make sure there aren't distribution objections before I start verifying everything. Some background: I would like to include some vendor specific SPICE models with Qucs, which are not under the GPL, but a license which (I hope) to be