Re: RFS: updated packages libticcutils, libfolia, uctodata, ucto, timbl, timblserver, mbt, mbtserver, frogdata, frog
Hi Maarten, Le 06/02/2024 à 23:30, Maarten van Gompel a écrit : Hi Pierre, Thanks for your reply. You're welcome! On Tue Feb 6, 2024 at 10:20 PM CET, Pierre Gruet wrote: I see ticcutils (at least) is affected by the ongoing 64-bit time_t transition, it has been NMU-ed to experimental. Yes, it seems this applies to most of the packages. I don't know exactly why (I don't think we expose time_t in our ABI), but I understand the transition applies broadly (better safe than sorry). I am afraid I am not skilled enough to answer :( Would you mind waiting for the end of this process (also acknowledging the related uploads and new binary package names in your packaging at that time) so that we don't interfere with the transition? That's okay, though I thought maybe releasing these new packages might make the transitional packages obsolete and reduce some complexity. There is at least one dependency of all these packages that is waiting in experimental for its own transition. When it has started, these packages can be uploaded to unstable in a somehow organized process. I trust it is better to wait in order to be sure we don't interfere with anything :) By the way, I noticed dimbl is a reverse dependency of ticcutils and timbl, and it has not been updated for ages. Could you also include it in your series of upcoming uploads please? Please do reach out again after the transition of the packages has finished and we will proceed :) Regards, Best, -- Pierre OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFS: updated packages libticcutils, libfolia, uctodata, ucto, timbl, timblserver, mbt, mbtserver, frogdata, frog
Hi Pierre, Thanks for your reply. On Tue Feb 6, 2024 at 10:20 PM CET, Pierre Gruet wrote: > I see ticcutils (at least) is affected by the ongoing 64-bit time_t > transition, it has been NMU-ed to experimental. Yes, it seems this applies to most of the packages. I don't know exactly why (I don't think we expose time_t in our ABI), but I understand the transition applies broadly (better safe than sorry). > Would you mind waiting > for the end of this process (also acknowledging the related uploads and > new binary package names in your packaging at that time) so that we > don't interfere with the transition? That's okay, though I thought maybe releasing these new packages might make the transitional packages obsolete and reduce some complexity. Regards, -- Maarten van Gompel (proycon) web: https://proycon.anaproy.nl gpg: 0x39FE11201A31555C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: updated packages libticcutils, libfolia, uctodata, ucto, timbl, timblserver, mbt, mbtserver, frogdata, frog
Hi Maarten, Le 02/02/2024 à 14:47, Maarten van Gompel a écrit : Hi, After a hiatus of too many years, I finally updated the debian packages for our software stack to their latest upstream releases: * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libticcutils * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libfolia * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/uctodata * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ucto * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/timbl * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/timblserver * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/mbt * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/mbtserver * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/frogdata * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/frog The packages should be built in the above order because of intra-dependencies. As it's been a while, I hope I did everything right. Of course I verified the packages work, so things look promising. I did get some minor lintian warnings like: W: frog source: superfluous-file-pattern m4/pkg.m4 [debian/copyright:48] ... because of an earlier m4/* pattern. But judging by the documentation that should be allowed? One other relevant issue (for Frog) is the time64 transition ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061954) , which I hope I handled okay now. I'm hoping someone is willing to upload these packages? (and add the debian/vX.XX git tag) Kind Regards, Thanks for all this work! I see ticcutils (at least) is affected by the ongoing 64-bit time_t transition, it has been NMU-ed to experimental. Would you mind waiting for the end of this process (also acknowledging the related uploads and new binary package names in your packaging at that time) so that we don't interfere with the transition? Best, -- Pierre OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RFS: updated packages libticcutils, libfolia, uctodata, ucto, timbl, timblserver, mbt, mbtserver, frogdata, frog
Hi, After a hiatus of too many years, I finally updated the debian packages for our software stack to their latest upstream releases: * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libticcutils * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/libfolia * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/uctodata * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ucto * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/timbl * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/timblserver * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/mbt * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/mbtserver * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/frogdata * https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/frog The packages should be built in the above order because of intra-dependencies. As it's been a while, I hope I did everything right. Of course I verified the packages work, so things look promising. I did get some minor lintian warnings like: W: frog source: superfluous-file-pattern m4/pkg.m4 [debian/copyright:48] ... because of an earlier m4/* pattern. But judging by the documentation that should be allowed? One other relevant issue (for Frog) is the time64 transition ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061954) , which I hope I handled okay now. I'm hoping someone is willing to upload these packages? (and add the debian/vX.XX git tag) Kind Regards, -- Maarten van Gompel (proycon) web: https://proycon.anaproy.nl gpg: 0x39FE11201A31555C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
