Hello Alexander
The API is (at least should be) compatible within the PolyBoRi 0.8 series.
to check for all this it would be nice to provide a symbol file.
I know that this is a huge work but as your are the upstream of the project,
this should be not that hard.
look here [1] for the symbol
Hello Frédéric,
The API is (at least should be) compatible within the PolyBoRi 0.8 series.
to check for all this it would be nice to provide a symbol file.
I know that this is a huge work but as your are the upstream of the project,
this should be not that hard.
look here [1] for the symbol
Dear Frédéric!
I thought the flags would be automatically exported to the environment
using recent versions of debhelper. But it seems, that this is not the
case. (Unfortunately, lintian didn't complain on my system about this.)
I fixed that.
this is the case with compat level 9.
So if I am
Hello
I thought the flags would be automatically exported to the environment
using recent versions of debhelper. But it seems, that this is not the
case. (Unfortunately, lintian didn't complain on my system about this.)
I fixed that.
this is the case with compat level 9.
So if I am not wrong
Hello Alexander,
I just checkout your package and now there is only one lintian complain about
the hardening
N: Processing binary package libpolybori-0.8.2-1 (version 0.8.2-1, arch i386)
...
W: libpolybori-0.8.2-1: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libpolybori-0.8.2.so.1.0.0
N:
N:This package
Hi Frédéric,
I just checkout your package and now there is only one lintian complain about
the hardening
[...]
For some reson, it does not complain on my machine (after reading
CPPFLAGS etc. from the environment).
- I can see that you did not use dpkg-buildflags in your rules file
please
Hi!
I still have to do the cme fix-part. But perhaps you can already have
a look at me recent commits to ensure that the other issues were
resolved accordingly.
I got this done, too. See the last commit.
Best regards,
Alexander
--
Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Math. Alexander Dreyer
Abteilung
Good morning,
Yes now it works, but I have plenty of lintian warning or errors.
can you fix them all and explain also the name of the library package ?
thanks
Frederic
N: Using profile debian/main.
N: Setting up lab in /tmp/temp-lintian-lab-yHq5dzKbx6 ...
N:
N: Processing changes file
Hi!
Yes now it works, but I have plenty of lintian warning or errors.
can you fix them all and explain also the name of the library package ?
I hopefully fixed all lintian warnings. Please pull the newest version.
Best regards,
Alexander
--
Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Math. Alexander Dreyer
Hi!
Felix Salfelder prepared a recent PolyBoRi and pushed it here:
git://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/polybori.git
Even though Sylvestre Lendru had said, he would sponsor it, it never got
official.
Unfortunately, I'm not familiar which button to push now. (Please let me
know.)
Hi!
The button to push is to go to the Wiki page [1] and move polybori to
the sponsorship request section (and add the link).
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Sage
Cheers,
Tobias Hansen
Am 16.12.2012 21:53, schrieb Alexander Dreyer:
Hi!
Felix Salfelder prepared a recent PolyBoRi and
At some point git-buildpackage was not used anymore for this repository
(see [1]). For example, the upstream branch was edited manually. That is
a problem, because these changes will not be in the package. In these
packaging git repositories, the upstream branch is only changed via git
Hi!
At some point git-buildpackage was not used anymore for this repository
(see [1]). For example, the upstream branch was edited manually. That is
a problem, because these changes will not be in the package. In these
packaging git repositories, the upstream branch is only changed via git
Hi!
git-buildpackage --git-upstream-tag=origin/upstream
seems to work. But I'll try to get git import-orig done.
Ok, I hope it will work now, see
g...@git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/polybori.git
Best regards,
Alexander
--
Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Math. Alexander Dreyer
Abteilung
Hi!
I thought that a website comparing the versions of all SAGE related
packages with the versions in Debian would be very helpful, so I took
Frédéric Péters' script which generates such pages for GNOME and
modified it a bit to do the same for SAGE. (BTW, nice work Frédéric! I
always liked the
I forgot to forward it to the list too...
Snark
Message original
Sujet: Re: SAGE in Debian status page
Date : Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:37:30 +0100
De : Julien Puydt julien.pu...@laposte.net
Pour : Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org
Le 15/12/2012 12:34, Tobias Hansen a écrit :
I
Hi Julien,
I'm aware of your graph, but it was not much work to modify the GNOME
script and the new page keeps itself up to date both with regard to new
SAGE packages and Debian versions. It also has links to all the PTS
pages. BTW, what is the best way to view the dot file? Here it was
opened by
Tobias Hansen than...@debian.org writes:
what is the best way to view the dot file? Here it was
opened by LibreOffice.
the dot command can be found in the package graphviz.
d
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
18 matches
Mail list logo
