code-saturne 5.3.1+repack-1 MIGRATED to testing

2018-12-25 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the code-saturne source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 5.2.1+repack-1 Current version: 5.3.1+repack-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a

silx is marked for autoremoval from testing

2018-12-25 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
silx 0.9.0+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-01-22 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 916024: pocl: pocl FTBFS: symbol differences -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net

liggghts 3.8.0+repack1-1 MIGRATED to testing

2018-12-25 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the liggghts source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 3.7.0+repack1-1.1 Current version: 3.8.0+repack1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a

Re: Comments regarding med-fichier_4.0.0+repack-3~exp1_amd64.changes

2018-12-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Gilles, > Would have been simpler to mention it in the first place. Given the context of the mail I had assumed that was implicit. Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: Comments regarding med-fichier_4.0.0+repack-3~exp1_amd64.changes

2018-12-25 Thread Gilles Filippini
Graham Inggs a écrit le 25/12/2018 à 19:46 : > Hi Chris > > On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 at 20:36, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Hey, it's your package! :) No, I was merely seeing an override for >> what could be a Lintian bug. Quickly looking into this, these two >> tags were removed in Lintian 2.5.5 (Feb 2012)

Re: Bug#912914: gap breaks multiple autopkgtests

2018-12-25 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 07:10:15PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > > On 25/12/2018 18:00, Bill Allombert wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 04:45:32PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have just have began to have a look on this issue. > >> > >> It appears that gap-io does no

blis_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2018-12-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:13:26 + Source: blis Binary: libblis-dev libblis-openmp-dev libblis-pthread-dev libblis-serial-dev libblis1 libblis1-openmp libblis1-pthread libblis1-serial libblis64-dev libblis64-openmp-dev

Re: Comments regarding med-fichier_4.0.0+repack-3~exp1_amd64.changes

2018-12-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Chris On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 at 20:36, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hey, it's your package! :) No, I was merely seeing an override for > what could be a Lintian bug. Quickly looking into this, these two > tags were removed in Lintian 2.5.5 (Feb 2012) so can probably just be > dropped. Ah! I didn't

Re: Comments regarding med-fichier_4.0.0+repack-3~exp1_amd64.changes

2018-12-25 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Graham, > I'm unable to get Lintian to show this message locally, so I'd also > like to know which option is needed to display it. Hey, it's your package! :) No, I was merely seeing an override for what could be a Lintian bug. Quickly looking into this, these two tags were removed in Lintian

Re: Comments regarding med-fichier_4.0.0+repack-3~exp1_amd64.changes

2018-12-25 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi On Tue, 25 Dec 2018 at 01:08, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Which lintian option does cause this message? > > Option? Don't you mean tag? :) ie. "uploader-address-missing" etc. ^ I'm unable to get Lintian to show this message locally, so I'd also like to know which option is needed to display it.

Re: Bug#912914: gap breaks multiple autopkgtests

2018-12-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 25/12/2018 18:00, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 04:45:32PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have just have began to have a look on this issue. >> >> It appears that gap-io does no more build with gap 4.10 : >> a closer look reveals that /usr/lib/gap is missing

Re: Bug#912914: gap breaks multiple autopkgtests

2018-12-25 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 04:45:32PM +0400, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello, > > I have just have began to have a look on this issue. > > It appears that gap-io does no more build with gap 4.10 : > a closer look reveals that /usr/lib/gap is missing some folder previously > provided with the gap-dev

plplot_5.14.0+dfsg-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2018-12-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 13:29:12 +0100 Source: plplot Binary: libplplot-dev libplplot16 libplplotcxx14 libplplotfortran0 libplplot-java libcsironn0 libcsirocsa0 libqsastime0 libqsastime-dev plplot-driver-xwin

Processing of plplot_5.14.0+dfsg-1_source.changes

2018-12-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
plplot_5.14.0+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: plplot_5.14.0+dfsg-1.dsc plplot_5.14.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processed: block 916150 with 917277

2018-12-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 916150 with 917277 Bug #916150 [src:sketch] sketch FTBFS: sketch.texi: Dimension too large 916150 was not blocked by any bugs. 916150 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 916150: 917277 > thanks Stopping processing here.

Re: Bug#912914: gap breaks multiple autopkgtests

2018-12-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, I have just have began to have a look on this issue. It appears that gap-io does no more build with gap 4.10 : a closer look reveals that /usr/lib/gap is missing some folder previously provided with the gap-dev package: /usr/lib/gap/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-default64 /usr/lib/gap/gen

Re: Segyio 1.8.0 new upstream release

2018-12-25 Thread Jørgen Kvalsvik
... and that release too was broken for big-endian archs. I patched the bug upstream (a refactoring gone wrong), and now I tested on launchpad as well (as I don't have any big-endian machines to test on). The uploaded 1.8.3 built cleanly: