Re: hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 3:55 PM Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > On 05.02.22 11:14, Tino Didriksen wrote: > > This was resolved a year ago: > > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2021-February/090093.html > > > > Did an incorrect tarball get analyzed/uploaded or

Re: hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, On 05.02.22 11:14, Tino Didriksen wrote: This was resolved a year ago: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2021-February/090093.html Did an incorrect tarball get analyzed/uploaded or something? 'cause https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst has the

Re: hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

G'day, This was resolved a year ago: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/debian-science-maintainers/2021-February/090093.html Did an incorrect tarball get analyzed/uploaded or something? 'cause https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/hfst has the correctly licensed code, and has had that

hfst_3.15.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi, our hardworking trainees added a note to your package: - back-ends/foma/cpp-version/apply.cc mentions GNU General Public License version 2 but d/c mentions License: Apache-2.0 same for coaccessible.cc and many other. See Comment in the matching d/c stanza. I went to that page and