lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1.dsc
lhapdf_5.9.1-3.1.debian.tar.xz
lhapdf-ccwrap-doc_5.9.1-3.1_all.deb
lhapdf-pdfsets-minimal_5.9.1-3.1_all.deb
liblhapdf-dev_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb
liblhapdf0_5.9.1-3.1_amd64.deb
Your message dated Sat, 22 Aug 2015 09:41:19 +
with message-id e1zt5id-0003tl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#786122: fixed in lhapdf 5.9.1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #786122,
regarding lhapdf: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1.dsc
sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8.orig.tar.bz2
sagemath-database-elliptic-curves_0.8-1.debian.tar.xz
sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1.dsc
sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg.orig.tar.bz2
sagemath-database-graphs_20150724+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
Mapping sid to unstable.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 13:15:59 +0200
Source: sagemath-database-elliptic-curves
Binary: sagemath-database-elliptic-curves
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Mapping sid to unstable.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:09:29 +0200
Source: sagemath-database-graphs
Binary: sagemath-database-graphs
Architecture: source all
Version: 20150724+dfsg-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
Roelof,
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 09:38:12AM +0200, David Bremner wrote:
Roelof Berg rb...@berg-solutions.de writes:
Hi,
this is about the third or fourth time I'm asking this. Any help would
be greatly aprechiated.
I uploaded a new version 1.4.0-2 of limereg that fixes #792624 and
berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully
to localhost
along with the files:
berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2.dsc
berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2.debian.tar.xz
berkeley-abc_1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
facеbook
Римма пишет:
Зарабатывайте на бинарных опционах уже сегодня! Самый популярный вид заработка
онлайн.
Заработать сейчас
Сообщение было отправлено на
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org. Если вы не хотите получать
эти эл. письма от Facebook, либо если вы не хотите,
pyviennacl 1.0.2+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-09-28
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
795544: fglrx-driver: xorg: open source video drivers flawed?
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:36:28 +0200
Source: berkeley-abc
Binary: berkeley-abc
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.01+20150706hgc3698e0+dfsg-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Dearest One
I feel quite safe in dealing with you in this Mutual Beneficial
transaction. Though, this medium (Internet) has been greatly abused, I
choose to reach you through it because it Still remains the
fastest,and most secured Medium of communication. However, this
transaction is purely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Arturo:
Have you made any progress ?
Thanks,
Jerome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV2QsmAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjxcQH/j96ha2fKrodVdu8E9MxMB7F
bMdpC5SokKhRh+Eu6rZGioC59DecM8HkAPuuqiYsmazYe2mNFLpf2rseiTC3jb3V
FYI: The status of the rw source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.7-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
Control: reopen -1
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:03:51 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 at 13:12:19 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
- If there are no reverse dependencies, it should be the package
maintainers decision if a transition is needed. However this might
break
Processing control commands:
reopen -1
Bug #791173 {Done: Simon McVittie s...@debian.org} [src:libstxxl] libstxxl:
library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #791173 to the same values
previously set
--
791173:
Processing control commands:
block -1 by 791173
Bug #796544 [src:osrm] osrm: FTBFS: undefined reference to
`google::protobuf::io::StringOutputStream::StringOutputStream(std::string*)'
796544 was blocked by: 791246
796544 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 796544: 791173
--
FYI: The status of the graywolf source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.1.2-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
18 matches
Mail list logo