Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Forum: On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense >> to say so. >> For a least two reasons:

Processed: block 800556 with 803477

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 800556 with 803477 Bug #800556 [release.debian.org] transition: suitesparse4.4 800556 was blocked by: 800101 793765 793762 793764 800556 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 800556: 803477 > thanks Stopping processing here.

libdogleg_0.09-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 16:06:06 +0100 Source: libdogleg Binary: libdogleg2 libdogleg-doc libdogleg-dev libdogleg2-dbg Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 0.09-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

ipe_7.1.10-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libipe7.1.10 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the

Processing of libdogleg_0.09-2_amd64.changes

libdogleg_0.09-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdogleg_0.09-2.dsc libdogleg_0.09-2.debian.tar.xz libdogleg-dev_0.09-2_amd64.deb libdogleg-doc_0.09-2_all.deb libdogleg2-dbg_0.09-2_amd64.deb libdogleg2_0.09-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your

Processing of ipe_7.1.10-1_amd64.changes

ipe_7.1.10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ipe_7.1.10-1.dsc ipe_7.1.10.orig.tar.gz ipe_7.1.10-1.debian.tar.xz ipe_7.1.10-1_amd64.deb libipe-dev_7.1.10-1_amd64.deb libipe7.1.10_7.1.10-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 22 November 2015 at 07:04, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: > it should be ok now. It looks OK to me. Shall I go ahead and upload? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processing of guidata_1.7.2-1~exp1_source.changes

guidata_1.7.2-1~exp1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: guidata_1.7.2-1~exp1.dsc guidata_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz guidata_1.7.2-1~exp1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers

guidata_1.7.2-1~exp1_source.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 08:30:33 +0100 Source: guidata Binary: python-guidata python3-guidata python-guidata-doc Architecture: source Version: 1.7.2-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham: On 22/11/15 08:27, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 22 November 2015 at 07:04, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: >> it should be ok now. > > It looks OK to me. Shall I go

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Again: On 21/11/15 13:06, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense >> to say so. >> For a least two reasons:

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 20 November 2015 at 14:06, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > It appears that the faulty one is the one in the archive, if it makes sense > to say so. > For a least two reasons: > 1] ` ./debian/rules get-orig-source ' gives the one in the git; > 2] the one in the archive is