apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:apertium-swe-nor is NEW. source:apertium-swe-nor is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are

Processing of apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544-1_amd64.changes

apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544-1.dsc apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-swe-nor_0.2.0~r69544-1_all.deb Greetings,

pyfftw is marked for autoremoval from testing

pyfftw 0.10.1+dfsg1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-06-30 It is affected by these RC bugs: 826036: python3-pyfftw: importing pyfftw fails with ImportError/undefined symbol fftwl_plan_with_nthreads -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

osmo-bts_0.4.0-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 23:31:28 +0200 Source: osmo-bts Binary: osmo-bts Architecture: source Version: 0.4.0-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Bug#826776: marked as done (libgl2ps1 has wrong Breaks/Replaces against libgl2ps0)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:38:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826776: fixed in gl2ps 1.3.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #826776, regarding libgl2ps1 has wrong Breaks/Replaces against libgl2ps0 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#826721: marked as done (gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:38:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826721: fixed in gnuplot 5.0.3+dfsg3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #826721, regarding gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link

gl2ps_1.3.9-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 23:14:35 +0200 Source: gl2ps Binary: libgl2ps-dev libgl2ps1 Architecture: source Version: 1.3.9-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:33:31 +0200 Source: gnuplot Binary: gnuplot gnuplot-doc gnuplot-nox gnuplot-qt gnuplot-x11 gnuplot-data Architecture: source Version: 5.0.3+dfsg3-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer:

Processing of osmo-bts_0.4.0-2_source.changes

osmo-bts_0.4.0-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: osmo-bts_0.4.0-2.dsc osmo-bts_0.4.0-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processing of gl2ps_1.3.9-2_source.changes

gl2ps_1.3.9-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gl2ps_1.3.9-2.dsc gl2ps_1.3.9-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processing of gl2ps_1.3.9-2_source.changes

gl2ps_1.3.9-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: gl2ps_1.3.9-2.dsc gl2ps_1.3.9-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#826776: libgl2ps1 has wrong Breaks/Replaces against libgl2ps0

Package: libgl2ps1 Version: 1.3.9-1 Severity: important With the latest gl2ps package being synced to Ubuntu, I've noticed that the libgl2ps1 package has a Breaks/Replaces against libgl2ps0 (<< 1.3.9-1~exp1). These package relationships are unnecessary, as the two packages contain no overlapping

Processing of gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3_source.changes

gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3.dsc gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processing of gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3_source.changes

gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3.dsc gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 13:55:55 +0530 Source: giella-sme Binary: giella-sme giella-sme-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.0.20150917~r121176-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Bug#826721: gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4

Control: found -1 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 On 2016-06-08 19:14 +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > fixed 826721 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 > thanks No, it's not fixed. In 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 you added commands to remove the old alternatives to the prerm script, but this does not help because of two reasons: 1. The prerm script

Processed: found 824959 in 2.1-1.1, found 826708 in 4.6.6-3, found 826708 in 5.0.3+dfsg2-2 ...

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 824959 2.1-1.1 Bug #824959 [src:kadu-mime-tex] QtQuick1 removal from the archive Marked as found in versions kadu-mime-tex/2.1-1.1. > found 826708 4.6.6-3 Bug #826708 [gnuplot-doc,gnuplot5-doc] gnuplot5-doc and gnuplot-doc: error when

Bug#826721: gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4

fixed 826721 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 thanks -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#826721: marked as done (gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4)

Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:14:51 +0200 with message-id

Processed: Re: Bug#826721: gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 826721 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 Bug #826721 [gnuplot-x11] gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4 Marked as fixed in versions gnuplot/5.0.3+dfsg3-2. > thanks Stopping

Bug#805678: marked as done (pyoperators: FTBFS: NameError: global name 'FFTW_DEFAULT_NUM_THREADS' is not defined)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2016 16:44:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#805678: fixed in pyoperators 0.13.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #805678, regarding pyoperators: FTBFS: NameError: global name 'FFTW_DEFAULT_NUM_THREADS' is not

pyoperators_0.13.11-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:46:10 +0100 Source: pyoperators Binary: python-pyoperators python3-pyoperators Architecture: source Version: 0.13.11-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

ntl_9.9.1-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libntl27 is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed through to the

pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:50:00 +0200 Source: pyfai Binary: pyfai python-pyfai python-pyfai-dbg python3-pyfai python3-pyfai-dbg python-pyfai-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.12.0+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

libgetdata 0.9.2.1-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the libgetdata source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.9.1-2 Current version: 0.9.2.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:giella-sme is NEW. binary:giella-sme-dev is NEW. source:giella-sme is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be

Bug#811590: FTBFS with GCC 6: statement indented as if it were guarded by version graph

Dear Martin Michlmayr, Many thanks for your bug report. A new upstream version rheolef-6.7 of the source package should now compile with g++-6 and fix this bug. Best wishes, Pierre -- pierre.saram...@imag.fr Directeur de Recherche CNRS Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France

Bug#824788: FTBFS in sid: recipe for target 'rheolef.pdf' failed

Dear Sébastien Villemot, Many thanks for your bug report. The new upstream version rheolef-6.7 should fix it now. Best wishes, Pierre -- pierre.saram...@imag.fr Directeur de Recherche CNRS Laboratoire Jean Kuntzmann, Grenoble, France http://www-ljk.imag.fr/membres/Pierre.Saramito --

Processing of giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176-1_amd64.changes

giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176-1.dsc giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176.orig.tar.bz2 giella-sme_0.0.20150917~r121176-1.debian.tar.xz giella-sme-dev_0.0.20150917~r121176-1_all.deb

Processing of pyoperators_0.13.11-1_source.changes

pyoperators_0.13.11-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pyoperators_0.13.11-1.dsc pyoperators_0.13.11.orig.tar.gz pyoperators_0.13.11-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) --

Processing of pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1_source.changes

pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1.dsc pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) --

Processing of pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1_source.changes

pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1.dsc pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg.orig.tar.gz pyfai_0.12.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) --

Processing of ntl_9.9.1-1_amd64.changes

ntl_9.9.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ntl_9.9.1-1.dsc ntl_9.9.1.orig.tar.gz ntl_9.9.1-1.debian.tar.xz libntl-dev_9.9.1-1_amd64.deb libntl27-dbgsym_9.9.1-1_amd64.deb libntl27_9.9.1-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

apertium_3.4.2~r68466-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:07:31 +0530 Source: apertium Binary: apertium libapertium3-3.4-0 apertium-dev apertium-all-dev Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 3.4.2~r68466-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer:

Bug#826732: gnuplot-nox: gnuplot-nox uninstallable

Package: gnuplot-nox Version: gnuplot-nox uninstallable Severity: important File: gnuplot-nox gnuplot-nox seems to be uninstallable on sid: $ sudo apt install gnuplot-nox Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some

Bug#826336: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: iep | 3.7-2 | source, all iep-common | 3.7-2 | all python3-ieplib | 3.7-2 | all --- Reason --- ROM, superseded by pyzo

apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 17:26:33 +0530 Source: apertium-dan-nor Binary: apertium-dan-nor Architecture: source all Version: 1.3.0~r67099-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099-1_amd64.changes

apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099-1.dsc apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-dan-nor_1.3.0~r67099-1_all.deb Greetings,

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, >Right now the package rocks. >But the upstream version is (very) old, and the Debian package material >clearly needs some refreshment. Is a patch really appropriate here ? >May I rather wait for clear orphaning instead ? I see (2.30 VS 2.70)... what about: gbp import-dscs --debsnap

Bug#826721: gnuplot-x11: update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4

Package: gnuplot-x11 Version: 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 Severity: serious Your package failed to configure: , | # LANG=C dpkg --configure --pending | Setting up gnuplot-x11 (5.0.3+dfsg3-1) ... | update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already managed by gnuplot4 |

armadillo_6.700.6+dfsg-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports, jessie-backports

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 13:25:20 +0200 Source: armadillo Binary: libarmadillo-dev libarmadillo6 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1:6.700.6+dfsg-1~bpo8+1 Distribution: jessie-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Thanks for the reply. On 08/06/16 10:40, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > >> May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working > >> the [surface] evolver package ? > > A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package > and only the

apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:10:01 +0200 Source: apertium-nob Binary: apertium-nob Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.0~r69513-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:10:01 +0200 Source: apertium-swe Binary: apertium-swe Architecture: source all Version: 0.7.0~r69513-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, >May I fill an ITA or something to signify that someone to working >the [surface] evolver package ? A bug with patches should be enough, ITA means somebody orphaning the package and only the maintainer/MIA team can do it. But a bug with patches and you proposing the maintainership is

Processing of apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes

apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513-1.dsc apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-swe_0.7.0~r69513-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, On 08/06/16 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > > >> i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >> originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), >> and this one is not. >> >> AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, >i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam >originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this >one is not. > >AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of >view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved

Processing of apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes

apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513-1.dsc apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-nob_0.9.0~r69513-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 09:10:01 +0200 Source: apertium-nno Binary: apertium-nno Architecture: source all Version: 0.9.0~r69513-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes

apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513-1.dsc apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-nno_0.9.0~r69513-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

Bug#826701: marked as done (gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3)

Your message dated Wed, 08 Jun 2016 07:20:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826701: fixed in gnuplot 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #826701, regarding gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in

gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 08:54:18 +0200 Source: gnuplot Binary: gnuplot gnuplot-doc gnuplot-nox gnuplot-qt gnuplot-x11 gnuplot-data Architecture: source Version: 5.0.3+dfsg3-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer:

apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:44:53 +0530 Source: apertium-swe Binary: apertium-swe Architecture: source all Version: 0.6.0~r68541-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2_source.changes

gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2.dsc gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#826708: gnuplot5-doc and gnuplot-doc: error when trying to install together

Package: gnuplot-doc,gnuplot5-doc Version: gnuplot-doc/4.6.6-3 Version: gnuplot5-doc/5.0.3+dfsg2-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-file-overwrite Date: 2016-06-08 Architecture: amd64 Distribution: sid Hi, automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and

Processing of gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2_source.changes

gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2.dsc gnuplot_5.0.3+dfsg3-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Processing of apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541-1_amd64.changes

apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541-1.dsc apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-swe_0.6.0~r68541-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

apertium-nob_0.8.0~r68541-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:46:13 +0530 Source: apertium-nob Binary: apertium-nob Architecture: source all Version: 0.8.0~r68541-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:20:51 +0530 Source: apertium-dan Binary: apertium-dan Architecture: source all Version: 0.5.0~r67099-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Re: ITA for an abandoned package: evolver case

Hi, i am maintaining many packages, which were maintained by Adam originally. But all of them are team-maintained (Debian Science), and this one is not. AFAIK Adam is not active in Debian last several years. From my point of view, it will not be too offensive, if evolver will be moved under the

Processing of apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099-1_amd64.changes

apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099-1.dsc apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-dan_0.5.0~r67099-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

Bug#826701: gnuplot-data: Version 5.0.3+dfsg3-1 tries to overwrite a file which is also in package gnuplot-tex 4.6.6-3

Related to this: after installing the -data package with --force-overwrite, the apt-get -f install complains about an alternatives entry related to the -x11 package: Setting up gnuplot-x11 (5.0.3+dfsg3-1) ... update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/share/gnuplot/gnuplot.gih is already