apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:apertium-tat is NEW. source:apertium-tat is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely

Processing of apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887-1_amd64.changes

apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887-1.dsc apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-tat_0.1.0~r60887-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

Bug#826042: Spyder crashes on start

Could you package the master branch, which works pretty well out of the box with Debian unstable? This would make this package usable again. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#812466: marked as done (gnuplot5 depends on gnuplot4)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:11:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826768: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #812466, regarding gnuplot5 depends on gnuplot4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#795221: marked as done (gnuplot5-qt: crash in g_slist_copy_deep / assertion failures)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:11:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#826768: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #795221, regarding gnuplot5-qt: crash in g_slist_copy_deep / assertion failures to be marked as

Bug#826768: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: gnuplot5 | 5.0.3+dfsg2-1 | source, all gnuplot5 | 5.0.3+dfsg2-2 | source, all gnuplot5-data | 5.0.3+dfsg2-1 | all gnuplot5-data | 5.0.3+dfsg2-2 | all gnuplot5-doc | 5.0.3+dfsg2-1 | all

Bug#826768: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 5.0.3+dfsg2-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package gnuplot5 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see

Bug#827740: isympy start fails: No module named sympy.interactive

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:08:28 +0200 Alberto Luaces wrote: > Francesco Poli writes: > > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:55:38 +0200 Alberto Luaces wrote: > > > >> Francesco Poli writes: > > [...] > >> > I see that you have python3-sympy installed. > >> > > >> > What's the output of > >> > > >> > $

apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:19:17 +0530 Source: apertium-kaz Binary: apertium-kaz Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.0~r61338-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-spa-arg_0.4.0~r64399-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 16:56:33 +0530 Source: apertium-spa-arg Binary: apertium-spa-arg Architecture: source all Version: 0.4.0~r64399-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-arg-cat_0.1.0~r64925-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 17:25:54 +0530 Source: apertium-arg-cat Binary: apertium-arg-cat Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.0~r64925-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-eu-en_0.3.1~r56205-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:23:19 +0530 Source: apertium-eu-en Binary: apertium-eu-en Architecture: source all Version: 0.3.1~r56205-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-es-it_0.1.0~r51165-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:08:11 +0530 Source: apertium-es-it Binary: apertium-es-it Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.0~r51165-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-es-ast 1.1.0~r51165-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the apertium-es-ast source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.1.0~r51165-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple

openturns 1.7-3 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the openturns source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 1.7-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:apertium-kaz is NEW. source:apertium-kaz is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely

Bug#822125: marked as done (Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:30:00 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required has caused the Debian Bug report #822125, regarding Boost 1.55 to be removed; your attention required to be

Bug#827740: isympy start fails: No module named sympy.interactive

Francesco Poli writes: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:55:38 +0200 Alberto Luaces wrote: > >> Francesco Poli writes: > [...] >> > I see that you have python3-sympy installed. >> > >> > What's the output of >> > >> > $ /usr/bin/python --version >> > >> > on your system? >> >> $ python -V >> Python

Processing of apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1_amd64.changes

apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1.dsc apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338.orig.tar.bz2 apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1.debian.tar.xz apertium-kaz_0.1.0~r61338-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

ipe_7.2.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 21:57:11 -0500 Source: ipe Binary: ipe libipe7.2.4 libipe-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 7.2.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team

apertium-isl_0.1.0~r65494-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 17:07:08 +0530 Source: apertium-isl Binary: apertium-isl Architecture: source all Version: 0.1.0~r65494-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Comments regarding ipe_7.2.4-1_amd64.changes

please clarify src/ipelib/ipebitmap.cpp -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Bug#828717: gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Thanks for your report. I believe that the upstream team is working on this issues. Whatever, I am forwarding your report to them. Cheers, Jerome On 27/06/16 07:33, Martin Pitt wrote: > Package: gmp-ecm > Version: 7.0.1+ds-2 > Severity: important >

ffc_2016.1.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:13:14 +0200 Source: ffc Binary: python-ffc Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2016.1.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Processing of ffc_2016.1.0-1_amd64.changes

ffc_2016.1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ffc_2016.1.0-1.dsc ffc_2016.1.0.orig.tar.gz ffc_2016.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz python-ffc_2016.1.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) --

Bug#825583: marked as done (libopencv-gpu-dev: missing Depends: libopencv-gpu2.4v5)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:02:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#825583: fixed in opencv 2.4.9.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #825583, regarding libopencv-gpu-dev: missing Depends: libopencv-gpu2.4v5 to be marked as done.

Bug#818207: marked as done (opencv: Jasper removal)

Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:02:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#818207: fixed in opencv 2.4.9.1+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #818207, regarding opencv: Jasper removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

opencv_2.4.9.1+dfsg-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 05:08:42 + Source: opencv Binary: opencv-doc libcv-dev libcv2.4 libhighgui-dev libhighgui2.4 libcvaux-dev libcvaux2.4 libopencv-dev opencv-data libopencv-core-dev libopencv-core2.4v5

Bug#828717: Acknowledgement (gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms)

Hello again, sorry, this evaded me before, here it is: | GMP-ECM 7.0.1 [configured with GMP 6.1.0] [P-1] | Input number is 2^1009-1 (304 digits) | Using B1=1000, B2=17248, polynomial x^1, x0=1688984659 | Step 1 took 4ms | Step 2 took 16ms | ** Factor found in step 2: 3454817 | Found

Bug#828717: gmp-ecm: 7.0 regresses on 32 bit platforms

Package: gmp-ecm Version: 7.0.1+ds-2 Severity: important Hello, Since version 7.0, gmp-ecm fails on i386 and armhf (the two 32 bit architectures that Ubuntu runs tests on): http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gmp-ecm/yakkety/i386/

Bug#828716: python-hdf5storage: FTBFS: sphinx.ext.mathjax: other math package is already loaded

Source: python-hdf5storage Version: 0.1.13-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, python-hdf5storage fails to build from source in