eclib_20160720-2~bpo8+2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports->backports-policy

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 19:14:25 +0200 Source: eclib Binary: libec2 libec-dev eclib-tools Architecture: source amd64 Version: 20160720-2~bpo8+2 Distribution: jessie-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science

Bug#860278: openigtlink: please make the build reproducible

Source: openigtlink Version: 1.11.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: buildpath X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed that openigtlink could not be

Processing of eclib_20160720-2~bpo8+2_amd64.changes

eclib_20160720-2~bpo8+2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: eclib_20160720-2~bpo8+2.dsc eclib_20160720-2~bpo8+2.debian.tar.xz libec2_20160720-2~bpo8+2_amd64.deb libec-dev_20160720-2~bpo8+2_amd64.deb eclib-tools_20160720-2~bpo8+2_amd64.deb Greetings,

r-cran-aer_1.2-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, I am going to reject this package now .. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: sundials_2.7.0+dfsg-1~1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On April 13, 2017 4:55:23 AM PDT, Andreas Tille wrote: > >I wonder whether you think the package names will need some change. If >not I think it might make sense to push again to experimental to let it >pass new queue. Users should assume that packages in experimental are

pynac_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports->backports-policy, jessie-backports

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 12:56:38 +0200 Source: pynac Binary: libpynac2 libpynac-dev Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.6.91-1~bpo8+1 Distribution: jessie-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Re: sundials_2.7.0+dfsg-1~1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Dima, thanks a lot for your work on this and the status update. On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:56:25AM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: > Andreas Tille writes: > > > Please let me know if any help might be needed. New queue is currently > > very short - so this might be a good time

pynac_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:libpynac-dev is NEW. binary:libpynac2 is NEW. binary:libpynac-dev is NEW. binary:libpynac2 is NEW. source:pynac is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature

Processing of pynac_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

pynac_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: pynac_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1.dsc pynac_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz libpynac2_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb libpynac-dev_0.6.91-1~bpo8+1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on