On 13.01.2016 14:54, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I pinged ftpmaster yesterday to consider accepting VTK. Hope this
> helps ...
Thanks. Unfortunately it got rejected meanwhile...
Best regards,
Andreas
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Thibaut,
On 08.01.2016 03:38, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> thanks for the heads up. The package is on its way, thanks for the patch.
Thanks for the quick upload.
> I initially wanted to include it directly upstream but I realise that I
> don't have the time to do so right know.
I see.
Best
Hi Anton,
On 08.01.2016 06:35, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Andreas, I uploaded it 20/12/2015. So we
> need just to wait for a FTP-masters, to get it
> approved.
Yes, I realized that when looking at the package tracker yesterday.
I'm just saying that a short mail informing me about the upload
(and
Dear Maintainer,
the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
(and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
I'm wondering what the status of this bug is:
* Are you aware of the patch I provided?
* Do you plan an
Dear Maintainer,
the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
(and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
I'm wondering what the status of this bug is:
* Are you aware of the patch I provided?
* Do you plan an
Dear Maintainer,
the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
(and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
I'm wondering what the status of this bug is:
* Are you aware of the patch I provided?
* Do you plan an
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Anton,
thanks for uploading a fixed package.
But since it is stuck in the NEW queue, I would have
appreciated to be informed, when you uploaded it.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
(and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
I'm wondering what the status of this bug is:
* Are you aware of the patch I provided?
* Do you plan an
/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..20ff187
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+Description: Replace deprecated FFmpeg API
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
+Last-Update: <2015-11-02>
+
+---
/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..dd14b97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Description: Replace deprecated FFmpeg API
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
+Last-Update: <2015-11-02>
+
+--- vtk6
/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..d464a2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+Description: Replace deprecated FFmpeg API
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
+Last-Update: <2015-11-02>
+
+--- vtk-5.10
/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..6ac30d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+Description: Replace deprecated FFmpeg API
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
+Last-Update: <2015-11-02>
+
+--- yorick-a
/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..4e78e9a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+Description: Replace deprecated FFmpeg API
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
+Last-Update: <2015-11-02>
+
+--- ovito
/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..044e96e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/ffmpeg_2.9.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+Description: Replace deprecated FFmpeg API
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun <andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com>
+Last-Update: <2015-11-02>
+
+--- pa
Source: ovito
Version: 2.3.3+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: Patch
Dear Maintainer,
ovito currently fails to build due to a missing build-dependency on
libcgal-qt5-dev:
CMake Error at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/CGAL/CGALExports.cmake:83
(message):
The imported target "CGAL::CGAL_Qt5"
Hi Markus,
On 21.07.2015 17:50, Markus Koschany wrote:
Am 21.07.2015 um 17:38 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun:
On 20.07.2015 13:45, Markus Koschany wrote:
gazebo fails to build from source with the latest version of Bullet,
2.83.5. Please update your package.
This is fixed upstream [1][2
Source: paraview
Version: 4.1.0+dfsg+1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer,
paraview currently fails to build with the following error:
/tmp/buildd/paraview-4.1.0+dfsg+1/VTK/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx:
In member function 'bool vtkFreeTypeTools::CalculateBoundingBox(const T,
Source: vtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-5
Tags: sid
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Dear Maintainer,
vtk6 fails to build on sid/amd64, but it works on jessie/amd64 (hence the sid
tag).
The errors are:
/tmp/buildd/vtk6-6.1.0+dfsg2/Rendering/FreeType/vtkFreeTypeTools.cxx:
/patches/pkg-config.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+Description: Use pkg-config to determine FFmpeg linker flags
+
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com
+Last-Update: 2014-08-06
+
+--- visp-2.9.0.orig/CMakeModules/FindFFMPEG.cmake
visp-2.9.0/CMakeModules/FindFFMPEG.cmake
+@@ -94,9
/debian/patches/pkg-config.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+Description: Use pkg-config to determine FFmpeg linker flags
+
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com
+Last-Update: 2014-05-19
+
+--- vtk6-6.1.0+dfsg.orig/CMake/FindFFMPEG.cmake
vtk6-6.1.0+dfsg/CMake/FindFFMPEG.cmake
+@@ -55,17
/debian/patches/pkg-config.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+Description: Use pkg-config to determine FFmpeg linker flags
+
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com
+Last-Update: 2014-05-29
+
+--- paraview-4.1.0+dfsg.orig/VTK/CMake/FindFFMPEG.cmake
paraview-4.1.0+dfsg/VTK/CMake
/patches/pkg-config.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+Description: Use pkg-config to determine FFmpeg linker flags
+
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com
+Last-Update: 2014-05-19
+
+--- vtk-5.10.1.orig/IO/CMakeLists.txt
vtk-5.10.1/IO/CMakeLists.txt
+@@ -290,6 +290,18
@@
+Description: Use pkg-config to determine FFmpeg linker flags
+
+Author: Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com
+Last-Update: 2014-05-20
+
+--- yorick-av-0.0.3.orig/Makefile
yorick-av-0.0.3/Makefile
+@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ OBJS=yav.o
+ PKG_EXENAME=yorick
+
+ # PKG_DEPLIBS=-Lsomedir
Source: freecad
Version: 0.14.3702+dfsg-1
Severity: whishlist
Dear Maintainer,
currently freecad build-depends on libswscale-dev, but it seems not to
use this library, as none of the created binary packages depend on
libswscale.
Therefore, please remove this spurious build-dependency.
Best
Hi Colin,
On 24.06.2014 00:41, Colin Watson wrote:
Here's a patch:
* Look for PostgreSQL libraries in multiarch locations (closes: #751130).
diff -Nru vtk-5.8.0/debian/patches/multiarch-libpq.patch
vtk-5.8.0/debian/patches/multiarch-libpq.patch
---
Control: tags -1 patch
Hi,
On 14.05.2014 23:23, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
ovito build-depends on libavcodec-dev and libavdevice-dev, but it's not linking
against any of them? Is the build dep obsolete? If so, please remove it.
These build-dependencies are not obsolete. The reason that ovito
Package: libopencv-highgui-dev
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
currently libopencv-highgui-dev depends on libavcodec-dev, libavformat-dev and
libswscale-dev.
I packaged FFmpeg for Debian (ITP at [1]) and its development packages are
named libavcodec-ffmpeg-dev (conflicting with
27 matches
Mail list logo
