icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Ruben and Steffen, normally all Recommend:-packages need to be available before a package will be accepted. So in this case icestorm should only Suggest: arachne-pnr. Anyway, due to the name clash, most likely your icestorm won't make it into the archive under that name. Thorsten ===

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Ruben Undheim wrote: What about renaming it to "fpga-icestorm"? Sounds good. Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? I would suggest to talk to the current icestorm maintainer whether this might create conflicts. Thorsten --

Comments regarding ros-rosdistro_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes

Hi, I marked the package for accept, but strictly speaking you have two BSD-3 licenses, one with Willow Garage and one with OSR Foundation in clause 4. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

ros-catkin_0.6.15-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

same reason as other package Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jochen, please don't use UNRELEASED in your debian/changelog and take care of W: ros-catkin-pkg source: changelog-should-mention-nmu W: ros-catkin-pkg source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.2.10-1 Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

Comments regarding ros-catkin-pkg_0.2.10-1_amd64.changes

*sigh* marked for accept, though the NMU-lintian-warnings are still present ... Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

calculix-ccx-doc_2.8p2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

the same later-version-problem as calculix === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

calculix-ccx-test_2.8p2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

the same later-version-problem as calculix === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

calculix-ccx_2.8p2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Wolfgang, according to the file headers, the license of this software is GPL-2. So the license block in your debian/copyright should not have the term "or (at your option) any later version." Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your

r-cran-bayesfactor_0.9.11-1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, please take care of the copyright information found in BayesFactor/vignettes/extra/socialmedia/readme.txt Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our

gpaw_0.11.0.13004-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Marcin, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of: gpaw-0.11.0.13004/gpaw/test/pseudopotential/H_sg15.py gpaw-0.11.0.13004/c/cerf.c to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why

r-cran-lsmeans_2.20-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, please add the description of all rdata files. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

r-cran-modeltools_0.2-21-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, this is another package with the GPL-2-or-any-later-version-bug. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

r-cran-vcdextra_0.6-9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]). Either look at an example in package r-cran-genabel.data or ask Andreas about it. Thanks! Thorsten [1]

r-cran-caret_6.0-47-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Balint, as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]). Either look at an example in package r-cran-genabel.data or ask Andreas about it. Please also explain how I can build caret\vignettes\train_algo.pdf.

r-cran-contfrac_1.1-9-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, this is another package with the GPL-2-or-any-later-version-bug. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

r-cran-desolve_1.12-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, please add the missing license of deSolve/src/radau5.f to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. --

r-cran-elliptic_1.3-5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, according to DESCRIPTION the license is GPL-2, but your debian/copyright contains "... or (at your option) any later version.". This does not match. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

r-cran-modeltools_0.2-21-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, unfortunately I have to reject your package. according to DESCRIPTION the license is GPL-2 but your debian/copyright contains "... , or (at your option) any later version.". This does not really match. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't

r-cran-estimability_1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jonathon, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to DESCRIPTION the license is GPL-2, but the license block in debian/copyright contains or (at your option) any later version. Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files

muparser_2.2.3-5_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#795153: wrong license in debian/copyright

Package: libitpp Version: 4.3.1-5 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, according to ChangeLog-2008 the license has changed from GPL-2+ to GPL-3+. Please mention this in your debian/copyright. Thanks!

apertium-af-nl_0.2.0~r57554-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Kartik, please add the missing license of apertium-af-nl-0.2.0~r57554/paper/linguho.sty to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

Re: apertium-af-nl_0.2.0~r57554-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sat, 8 Aug 2015, Kartik Mistry wrote: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org wrote: please add the missing license of apertium-af-nl-0.2.0~r57554/paper/linguho.sty to your debian/copyright. Oops! Should I put complete text of http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt (LPPL)? Yes, please.

hfst_3.8.2~r4145-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Kartik, unfortunately I have to reject your package. You named your license block GPL-3 but the text contains or (at your option) any later version. This does not match ... Please mention in your debian/copyright that hfst-3.8.2~r4145/tools/src/hfst-optimized-lookup.* is also licensed

mmdb_2.0.1-1~exp1_i386.changes REJECTED

As requested by email, please close your bug manually. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

apertium-apy_0.1.0~r61159-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Kartik, unfortunately I found no hint that the license of this software is GPL-2+. I only found the GPL-3 license text. Can you please recheck the license with upstream? Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected,

geneagrapher_1.0c2+git20120704-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Doug, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing license of: Geneagrapher-master\bootstrap.py to your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new

apertium_3.4.0~r61013-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as told by email, there is something wrong ... Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

mpfi_1.5.1+ds-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jerome, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to NEWS and several file headers the license is LGPL2.1 and not GPL as in your debian/copyright Please also tell upstream that there should be a file COPYING.LIB. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this

suitesparse_4.4.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as I accepted 4.4.4, I think the older version can be recjected ... === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

coinor-bonmin_1.7.4-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please add the missing licenses of: experimental/RobotBonmin/BonNWayObject.hpp experimental/RobotBonmin/BonNWayObject.cpp src/Interfaces/BonminConfig.h src/Interfaces/Ampl/sos_kludge.cpp to your debian/copyright (there might be

Comments regarding r-cran-spam_1.0-1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Andreas, I marked your package for accept, but now you created this lintian warning: W: r-cran-spam source: unknown-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright paragraph at line 11 Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Comments regarding gazebo_3.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but please add deps/fcl/* with BSD-3 license to your debian/coypright. Accroding to gazebo/rendering/skyx/License.txt these files are GPLv3+, according to their file header, it is GPLv2+. Please ask upstream about the correct version. Thanks!

r-cran-spam_1.0-1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Andreas, this package seems to have a similar problem. README says that: Esmond Ng and Barry Peyton have very kindly given permission to use their routines under an open source license (2012/03/09 and 2014/08/29) but their license is not mentioned in your debian/copyright. Thorsten ===

Comments regarding apophenia_0.999b+ds1-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but asprintf.c is licensed under GPLv2+ and not only GPLv2. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Comments regarding coinmp_1.7.6-3_armhf.changes

Hi Rene, I marked your package for accept, but as you already use Files-Excluded: please (really) remove CoinMP/CoinMP.zip and other precompiled stuff. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

gazebo_3.0.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. On a short glimpse I found the following licenses that you did not mention in your debian/copyright: doc/search.js:// Natural Docs is licensed under the GPL. tools/check_test_ran.py:# Software License Agreement (BSD License)

Comments regarding r-cran-spdep_0.5-74-1_amd64.changes

ping? Hi Andreas, according to spdep/inst/README parts of src/soigraph.c are taken from a publication of Camebridge University Press. Can you please confirm that the license is really GPLv2+? spdep/R/bptest.sarlm.R seems to be just GPLv2 and not GPLv2+, doesn't it? Thorsten --

Re: nltk_3.0.0b1-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Hi Andreas, On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: What is the correct procedure to replace a package in the NEW queue? you can not remove anything in NEW, you can only ask to reject it ... ... and done. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

nltk_3.0.0b1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

as requested by Andreas === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Comments regarding flint_2.4.4-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, I marked your package for accept, but you might want to add longlong.h and fmpz/fits_si.c to your LGPL2.1 block. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Comments regarding r-cran-spdep_0.5-74-1_amd64.changes

Hi Andreas, according to spdep/inst/README parts of src/soigraph.c are taken from a publication of Camebridge University Press. Can you please confirm that the license is really GPLv2+? spdep/R/bptest.sarlm.R seems to be just GPLv2 and not GPLv2+, doesn't it? Thorsten --

Bug#754872: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Package: gnuplot Version: 4.6.5-8 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing licenses of: term/PostScript/aglfn.txt term/object.h term/fig.trm pm3d/contrib/pm3dConvertToImage.awk to

octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to your debian/copyright alle files under octovis/* are GPLv2. However I found files under GPLv2+, GPLv2 or GPLv3 and the icons are even LGPLv3 Please add those licenses and their copyright holder to debian/copyright as

Bug#747314: missing license in debian/copyright

Package: sdformat Version: 2.0.0-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing license of: sdformat-2.0.0/doc/search.js to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten --

Comments regarding pyviennacl_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, is there a reason that most of your package contains of a copy of Boost? Couldn't you use the version already in the archive? Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Comments regarding pyviennacl_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Toby, On Mon, 5 May 2014, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote: Since the source package is built directly from these upstream sources (no need to repackage, because the copyright situation is OK), but in [1] there are other reasons mentioned to repackage. Removing 4200 files out of 4300 seems to be

Re: Comments regarding pyviennacl_1.0.1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Toby, On Mon, 5 May 2014, Toby St Clere Smithe wrote: I know you have the final say here, but the same document[1], under seciont 6.7.8.2 point 3 makes the converse point that the orig tarball should, except where impossible for legal reasons, preserve the entire building and portablility

Comments regarding pyfftw_0.9.2+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, as you excluded the docs directory from the source tarball, you don't have to mention those files in debian/copyright ... Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Comments regarding deal.ii_8.1.0-3_multi.changes

Dear Matthias, I accepted your package, but the pktest-setup.sh actually is GPLv2+ ... Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: libccd_1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jose, On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: The files in libccd-1.5\src\testsuites\cu\* are licensed under LGPLv3+. Please mention this in debian/copyright. ok, one done ... Can you please ask upstream whether there are sources for libccd-1.5\doc\jgt98convex.pdf available? These

Re: libccd_1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Jose, On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: Sorry for not including you in the mail, I announced to the debian-science list that after send the issues[1][2] to upstream, all are fix now and upstream released a new version (2.0) that should include all these changes. ok, thanks, so I

libccd_1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Rejecting this old version and waiting for upload of 2.0 === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

libccd_1.5-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. The files in libccd-1.5\src\testsuites\cu\* are licensed under LGPLv3+. Please mention this in debian/copyright. Can you please ask upstream whether there are sources for libccd-1.5\doc\jgt98convex.pdf available? These should be

Bug#742026: please update debian/copyright

Package: liggghts Version: 3.0.0-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please update your debian/copyright. Especially licenses from lib/* and src/USER-MISC are missing. Thanks! Thorsten --

Re: pyfftw_0.9.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Ghislain, On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Andreas Tille wrote: I think Thorsten was not primarily refering to the *.html files. please have a look at the files in ./docs/html/_static. According to the file headers, there are lots of licenses used: BSD, MIT, GPLv2. These should be documented in

Bug#741603: missing license in debian/copyright

Package: ompl Version: 0.14.1-1 Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing licenses of ompl-0.14.1-Source\doc\css\bootstrap-responsive.css ompl-0.14.1-Source\doc\css\bootstrap.css

pyfftw_0.9.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please upgrade the GPL-3 entry in debian/copyright to GPL-3+ and add all missing licenses of files in docs/ Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or

wxastrocapture_1.8.1+git20140303+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Steffen, unfortunately I have to reject your package. According to your debian/copyright the license of this software is GPLv2+. I really found a file with that license, but most of the files are LGPL3+ or something else ... Can you please check the copyright of the files in doc/? Some

viennacl_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

maintainer request, waiting for new upload === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: viennacl_1.5.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Anton, On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Anton Gladky wrote: could you please explain, whether the package was rejected or accepted? Could it be the problem because of fact, that package moved from contrib to main? while we are at it, the package needs to be removed from contrib and can than be

deal.ii_8.1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please take care of these lintian errors in your package: E: libdeal.ii-doc: privacy-breach-w3c-valid-html usr/share/doc/libdeal.ii-doc/html/authors.html E: libdeal.ii-doc: privacy-breach-w3c-valid-html

Comments regarding healpix-cxx_3.11.2-4_amd64.changes

Dear Maintainer, there is some room for improvement in your debian/copyright file. The header paragraph is missing and the paragraph for alice/* seems to be superfluous. Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#737110: missing license in debian/copyright

Package: mathgl Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please add the missing MIT license of texinfo/*.min.js to debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Bug#736825: missing licenses in debian/copyright

Package: opencv Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, please update debian/copyright of this package. For example doc/pattern_tools/svgfig.py is GPLv2+, modules/features2d/src/mser.cpp is partly GPL.

Comments regarding r-cran-polycub_0.4-1-1_amd64.changes

Hi Andreas, I accepted your package, but can you please remove the text , or(at your option) any later version. from debian/copyright. This is a GPLv2 only package. Thanks! Thorsten -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#734856: licenses missing in debian/copyright

Package: openturns Severity: serious User: alteh...@debian.org Usertags: ftp X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org thanks Dear Maintainer, there are several COPYING files in your package whose contents is not part of debian/copyright:

<    1   2