Hello Santiago:
On 27/12/16 10:26, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Sorry if you don't like my communication style. Please try not to
> dismiss completely the build logs I sent and maybe you will see how my
> communication style improves greatly.
>
The communication style is involve in the respect
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> 2016-12-27 9:50 GMT+01:00 Santiago Vila :
> > This means, if you are bad at math, that the error will happen once
> > every 20 tries. If you only built it 5 times, you did not really tried
> > to reproduce it.
>
>
2016-12-27 9:50 GMT+01:00 Santiago Vila :
> This means, if you are bad at math, that the error will happen once
> every 20 tries. If you only built it 5 times, you did not really tried
> to reproduce it.
I'm not going to build every package 20 times to catch a "possible" bug,
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 08:20:54AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote:
> severity 848859 minor
> tags 848859 +unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi Santiago,
>
> thanks for your bugreport! I tried to reproduce the failing
> test, building getfem on barriere.d,o 5 times but in all
> cases it did not failed.
severity 848859 minor
tags 848859 +unreproducible
thanks
Hi Santiago,
thanks for your bugreport! I tried to reproduce the failing
test, building getfem on barriere.d,o 5 times but in all
cases it did not failed. Also the last upload of getfem was
successfully built on all supported platforms.