Re: Bug#848859: Lowering the bug`s severity

2016-12-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Santiago: On 27/12/16 10:26, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Sorry if you don't like my communication style. Please try not to > dismiss completely the build logs I sent and maybe you will see how my > communication style improves greatly. > The communication style is involve in the respect

Bug#848859: Lowering the bug`s severity

2016-12-27 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2016-12-27 9:50 GMT+01:00 Santiago Vila : > > This means, if you are bad at math, that the error will happen once > > every 20 tries. If you only built it 5 times, you did not really tried > > to reproduce it. > >

Bug#848859: Lowering the bug`s severity

2016-12-27 Thread Anton Gladky
2016-12-27 9:50 GMT+01:00 Santiago Vila : > This means, if you are bad at math, that the error will happen once > every 20 tries. If you only built it 5 times, you did not really tried > to reproduce it. I'm not going to build every package 20 times to catch a "possible" bug,

Bug#848859: Lowering the bug`s severity

2016-12-27 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 08:20:54AM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > severity 848859 minor > tags 848859 +unreproducible > thanks > > Hi Santiago, > > thanks for your bugreport! I tried to reproduce the failing > test, building getfem on barriere.d,o 5 times but in all > cases it did not failed.

Bug#848859: Lowering the bug`s severity

2016-12-26 Thread Anton Gladky
severity 848859 minor tags 848859 +unreproducible thanks Hi Santiago, thanks for your bugreport! I tried to reproduce the failing test, building getfem on barriere.d,o 5 times but in all cases it did not failed. Also the last upload of getfem was successfully built on all supported platforms.