Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-10 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 10/10/17 11:58, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:08:29AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: On 09/10/17 23:06, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: ... I was complaining about the insufficiencies behind this RC, more than the situ

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:08:29AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > On 09/10/17 23:06, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > > ... > > > I was complaining about the insufficiencies behind this RC, more than the > > > situation with Sphinx. No

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-09 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 09/10/17 23:06, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: ... I was complaining about the insufficiencies behind this RC, more than the situation with Sphinx. No offense to Adrian, but getting an RC bug reported without much context to work with is

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-09 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:28:22PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >... > I was complaining about the insufficiencies behind this RC, more than the > situation with Sphinx. No offense to Adrian, but getting an RC bug reported > without much context to work with is just plain frustrating. Without yo

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-09 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 03/10/17 12:28, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Control: forwarded -1 https://bitbucket.org/pybtex-devs/pybtex/pull-requests/9/ Hi Ghislain, On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:40:52AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: And what the hell am I supposed to do with this?! Nice of you to report the issue but, with

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-03 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: forwarded -1 https://bitbucket.org/pybtex-devs/pybtex/pull-requests/9/ Hi Ghislain, On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:40:52AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > And what the hell am I supposed to do with this?! > > Nice of you to report the issue but, without further context, I can't take > furt

Processed: Re: Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://bitbucket.org/pybtex-devs/pybtex/pull-requests/9/ Bug #877109 [src:pybtex] pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1: dh_sphinxdoc: DOCUMENTATION_OPTIONS does not define SOURCELINK_SUFFIX Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bitbucket.org/pybtex-dev

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-10-02 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 10:40:52AM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > > sphinx (1.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > ... > > * dh_sphinxdoc: Turn warning about missing SOURCELINK_SUFFIX to an error. > > ... > > -- Dmitry Shachnev Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:47:54 +0300 > > And what the hell am I supp

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1

2017-09-30 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
sphinx (1.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium ... * dh_sphinxdoc: Turn warning about missing SOURCELINK_SUFFIX to an error. ... -- Dmitry Shachnev Tue, 26 Sep 2017 17:47:54 +0300 And what the hell am I supposed to do with this?! Nice of you to report the issue but, without further context, I c

Bug#877109: pybtex FTBFS with Sphinx 1.6.4-1: dh_sphinxdoc: DOCUMENTATION_OPTIONS does not define SOURCELINK_SUFFIX

2017-09-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: pybtex Version: 0.21-2 Severity: serious https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/pybtex.html ... dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=pybuild dh_sphinxdoc: DOCUMENTATION_OPTIONS does not define SOURCELINK_SUFFIX debian/rules:18: recipe for target 'binary' failed make