Re: r-cran-miniui_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-04-04 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 03/04/17 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Leopold, > > the license block still contains the "or (at your option) any later > version"-clause. > >Thorsten Hi Thorsten!!! I understood finally the difference of GPL-3 and GPL-3+. I'm sorry if I'm so dummy, but I didn't find any

Re: r-cran-miniui_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Thorsten, reuploaded after Leopold fixed the issue. Thanks for your ftpmaster work Andreas. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Leopold, > > if your package is licensed under GPL-3, you should not use the > GPL-3+ template in your

Re: r-cran-miniui_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 27/03/17 a les 23:00, Thorsten Alteholz ha escrit: > > Hi Leopold, > > if your package is licensed under GPL-3, you should not use the > GPL-3+ template in your debian/copyright. > ought, it's curious. dh-make -s -c gpl3 generate this template: License: GPL-3.0+ This program is free

r-cran-miniui_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2017-03-27 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
Hi Leopold, if your package is licensed under GPL-3, you should not use the GPL-3+ template in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.