Hi Roger,
thanks for the information. I've uploaded the changes to the Debian
new queue.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:43:24PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> spdep_0.6-5 submitted to CRAN.
>
> Roger
>
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2016, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
>
Hi Roger,
thanks for your work on this issue. I confirm that you have removed the
file in question from SVN and removed the usage of the compute_soi
function from init.c and the function prototype from spdep.h. From my
perspective this should deal with the complaints Debian ftpmaster had.
I've
I've now spent three hours complying, IMHO far more than was sensible. The
questioned code is gone, despite my not agreeing with your complaints, nor
seeing that you were willing to contribute a replacement. Check out spdep
from R-Forge, and reply rapidly confirming that no further changes are
Hi Roger,
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:51:57PM +0200, Roger Bivand wrote:
> Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If they
> bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not simply
> copied from arm.c, but modified to use double rather than integer
>
Hi Andreas,
Please tell them that I am not willing to make any further changes. If
they bothered to look, they would have seen that the functions are not
simply copied from arm.c, but modified to use double rather than integer
coordinates. I can add arm.c for documentation and change the
Hi Roger,
I'm afraid I need to come back to you again about the licensing of the
file in question in the spdep package. Please read below what the
Debian ftpmasters think about the license:
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:00:23PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> ok, one step
Hi Andreas,
ok, one step further, but two questions remain:
- "... in its entirety ...", not being a native speaker, but for me that
sounds like you are only allowed to distribute the whole example code
and are not allowed to use just parts of it
- anyway, the main point is that you are
