On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 08:13:48 PM you wrote:
> Package: qwtplot3d
> Version: 0.2.7+svn191-9
> Severity: important
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-symbols
>
> This package fails to build with GCC 6. GCC 6 has not been released
> yet, but it's expected that
accepted, but with the same wish ...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hi Joost,
according to NEWS the license of this package has been changed from
GPL-2 to GPL-3+. Please update your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:25:20 +0200
Source: r-cran-matrixcalc
Binary: r-cran-matrixcalc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:49:35 +0200
Source: r-cran-semtools
Binary: r-cran-semtools
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.4.12-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Hi Thorsten,
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 08:50:31PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>
> I marked the package for accept, but please mention in the GPL-license
> block in your debian/copyright, that this software is not only licensed
> under GPL-2 but GPL-2+.
Committed; will be fixed w/ next
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 818814 2.0.2
Bug #818814 {Done: "Barak A. Pearlmutter" } [mlpack] mlpack:
FTBFS with libc 2.23: there are no arguments to 'isnan' that depend on a
template parameter
There is no source info for the package 'mlpack' at
Hi folks,
is there anybody who wants to take care for blitz++. Christophe and I
are listed as Uploaders. While I think Christophe is not active any
more (Christophe, please correct me if I'm wrong) I for myself had never
any specific interest in this package. It simply came to me and I do
not
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44-2.dsc: Invalid size hash for
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44.orig.tar.xz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 29912,
but ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44.orig.tar.xz has 29980.
If you did not include ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44.orig.tar.xz in
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:19:14 +0200
Source: ros-dynamic-reconfigure
Binary: libdynamic-reconfigure-config-init-mutex0d
libdynamic-reconfigure-config-init-mutex-dev python-dynamic-reconfigure
cl-dynamic-reconfigure
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 07:22:14 -0400
Source: givaro
Binary: libgivaro-dev libgivaro8 libgivaro-doc givaro-user-doc givaro-dev-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 4.0.1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:00:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#753847: fixed in givaro 4.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #753847,
regarding givaro: FTBFS with clang instead of gcc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 11:00:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#811847: fixed in givaro 4.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #811847,
regarding givaro: FTBFS with GCC 6: no match for
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Andreas,
On 20/07/16 10:33, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> is there anybody who wants to take care for blitz++.
If still applicable, I am ready to take care of it:
can you orphan it ?
Christophe and I
> are listed as Uploaders.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:12:31 +0200
Source: mlpack
Binary: libmlpack-dev libmlpack2 mlpack-bin mlpack-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2.0.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44-2.dsc
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44-2.debian.tar.xz
cl-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44-2_all.deb
r-cran-corpcor_1.6.8-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
r-cran-corpcor_1.6.8-2.dsc
r-cran-corpcor_1.6.8.orig.tar.gz
r-cran-corpcor_1.6.8-2.debian.tar.xz
r-cran-corpcor_1.6.8-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
binary:r-cran-corpcor is NEW.
source:r-cran-corpcor is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are
binary:r-cran-matrixcalc is NEW.
source:r-cran-matrixcalc is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are
r-cran-matrixcalc_1.0.3-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
r-cran-matrixcalc_1.0.3-2.dsc
r-cran-matrixcalc_1.0.3.orig.tar.gz
r-cran-matrixcalc_1.0.3-2.debian.tar.xz
r-cran-matrixcalc_1.0.3-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:44:59 +
with message-id <20160720074456.gi30...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#831832: libroot-core5.34: Upgrade to Version 6
has caused the Debian Bug report #831832,
regarding libroot-core5.34: Upgrade to Version 6
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:48:31 +0200
with message-id <87y44wn41c@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#831832: libroot-core5.34: Upgrade to Version 6
has caused the Debian Bug report #831832,
regarding libroot-core5.34: Upgrade to Version 6
to be marked as done.
This
ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44-2.dsc: Refers to non-existing file
'ros-dynamic-reconfigure_1.5.44.orig.tar.gz'
Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload?
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 818814 2.0.2
Bug #818814 [mlpack] mlpack: FTBFS with libc 2.23: there are no arguments to
'isnan' that depend on a template parameter
There is no source info for the package 'mlpack' at version '2.0.2' with
architecture ''
Unable to make
binary:python-cvxopt-doc is NEW.
binary:python3-cvxopt is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are
evolver_2.70+ds-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
evolver_2.70+ds-1.dsc
evolver_2.70+ds.orig.tar.gz
evolver_2.70+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
evolver-doc_2.70+ds-1_all.deb
evolver-nox-dbgsym_2.70+ds-1_amd64.deb
evolver-nox_2.70+ds-1_amd64.deb
binary:r-cran-lavaan is NEW.
source:r-cran-lavaan is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are
binary:r-cran-semtools is NEW.
source:r-cran-semtools is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
Packages are
28 matches
Mail list logo