Please find a patch to fix this issue attached. It may be applied onto
the already existing 01_Add_CMakeLists.patch
regards,
Florian
From a373b9bf9a2f5d0e87c944934426c74e17859345 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Preinstorfer f...@xell.at
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:38:28 +0200
Subject:
Le Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:18:26PM +0200, Karsten Hilbert a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:23:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
still supporting python-uno gives much headache (for example it's build is
a big hack and
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 08:03:52PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:07:24PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 04:23:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
still supporting python-uno gives much headache (for example it's build
is
a big
gyoto_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gyoto-doc_0.2.2-1_all.deb
gyoto_0.2.2-1_amd64.deb
libgyoto2_0.2.2-1_amd64.deb
gyoto-dbg_0.2.2-1_amd64.deb
libgyoto2-dev_0.2.2-1_amd64.deb
yorick-gyoto_0.2.2-1_amd64.deb
gyoto_0.2.2-1.dsc
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:58:00 +0200
Source: gyoto
Binary: gyoto libgyoto2 gyoto-dbg libgyoto2-dev yorick-gyoto gyoto-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 0.2.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:03:42 +
with message-id e1xw2lg-0004zz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#761709: fixed in gyoto 0.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #761709,
regarding gyoto: Please build-depends on libcfitsio-dev instead of
libcfitsio3-dev
to be marked as
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 15:06:13 +0200
Source: blas
Binary: libblas3 libblas-common libblas3gf libblas-dev libblas-test libblas-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.20110419-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Hello
I got your email from investor directory, I have an investment proposal for
you. For more details get back to us
Send response to : amandaletge...@gmx.com
Thanks
Henry Morgan
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hello Anton, Thorsten:
On 15/09/14 14:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
On a short glimpse I found the following licenses that you did not mention in
your debian/copyright:
doc/search.js:// Natural Docs is licensed under the
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:04:04 +0200
Source: yorick
Binary: yorick yorick-dbg yorick-data yorick-dev yorick-mpy-mpich2
yorick-mpy-openmpi yorick-mpy-common yorick-doc yorick-full
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version:
Your message dated Mon, 22 Sep 2014 15:51:08 +
with message-id e1xw5tm-00086m...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#761932: fixed in yorick 2.2.03+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #761932,
regarding yorick: linking with libpthread fixes FTBFS of yorick-av and
yorick-hdf5
to be
FYI: The status of the cimg source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.5.7+dfsg-1
Current version: 1.5.9+dfsg-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the lmfit-py source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 0.7.4+dfsg.2-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
FYI: The status of the sdformat source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 2.0.0-6
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Source: blas
Version: 1.2.20110419-7
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Builds of blast for all *i386 architectures have been failing because many
of xscblat1's subtests don't quite yield the expected results; see, e.g.,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 762484 1.2.20110419-7
Bug #762484 [src:blas] blas: FTBFS on *i386: xscblat1 subtests fail
No longer marked as found in versions blas/1.2.20110419-7.
found 762484 1.2.20110419-8
Bug #762484 [src:blas] blas: FTBFS on *i386: xscblat1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# the version in jessie is also affected
found 762484 1.2.20110419-7
Bug #762484 [src:blas] blas: FTBFS on *i386: xscblat1 subtests fail
Marked as found in versions blas/1.2.20110419-7.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
vmtk 1.0.1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-10-22
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
759957: gdcm: FTBFS: gdcm assumes that .man files are parsed with Doxygen's c
file parser
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
18 matches
Mail list logo
