Package: libvtk6-dev
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-4
Severity: serious
As per Debian Policy §10.2:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries
[...]
You must make sure that you use only released versions of shared
libraries to build your packages; otherwise other users will not
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# this is a java module, not installed in `jni`
severity 773420 important
Bug #773420 [libvtk6-dev] No SOVERSION in library
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 No SOVERSION in library
Bug #773420 [libvtk6-dev] Underlinked libraries in libvtk6-dev
Changed Bug title to 'No SOVERSION in library' from 'Underlinked libraries in
libvtk6-dev'
--
773420: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773420
Debian
Control: retitle -1 No SOVERSION in library
Actually looking at the file, I can see:
$ readelf -d ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libvtkRenderingCoreJava.so
[...]
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libjawt.so]
[...]
Since libjawt.so can only be loaded by the `java` process, I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 773420 important
Bug #773420 [libvtk6-dev] No SOVERSION in library
Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 773420 to the same value.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
773420:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 773422 important
Bug #773422 [libvtk6-java] Java binding is missing runtime libraries
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
773422:
severity 773422 important
thanks
It has libvtk6-dev in suggests section. For the moment it is
enough. Will be fixed later.
Anton
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: tcl-vtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-4
Severity: grave
This is not clear how one should use tcl-vtk6, it does not provide the
wish interpreter anymore (aka `vtk` runtime binary). I do not believe
the package is usable by anyone.
If I build vtk6 package locally and execute it:
$ sudo apt-get
Processing control commands:
severity -1 grave
Bug #773422 [libvtk6-java] Java binding is missing runtime libraries
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
--
773422: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 grave
Suggest != Recommends
The package *as-is* is not usable at all. Even installing
`libvtk6-dev` does not make it work, did you at least use this package
?
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: tags -1 - patch
Just for clarity, because I am really trying to use vtk6 java binding:
$ sudo apt-get install libvtk6-dev libvtk6-java vtk6-examples
$ javac -classpath /usr/share/java/vtk6.jar Cone.java
$ java -jar /usr/share/java/vtk6.jar Cone
no main manifest attribute, in
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - patch
Bug #773422 [libvtk6-java] Java binding is missing runtime libraries
Removed tag(s) patch.
--
773422: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773422
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
severity 773422 important
severity 773424 important
thanks
Please stop ping-pong the bug`s severity!
If something is not working for you as you await,
use more constructive tools and testing period to fix that,
not the freeze.
Cheers
Anton
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
On 18/12/2014 10:36, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 773422 important
Bug #773422 [libvtk6-java] Java binding is missing runtime libraries
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
severity 773424 important
Bug #773424 [tcl-vtk6]
2014-12-18 10:38 GMT+01:00 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
I don't think this is correct. Both packages are broken and should be
fixed (instead of changing
the priority).
Otherwise, they should be removed from jessie. Shipping broken packages
reflect badly on Debian.
I tested them so
On 18/12/2014 10:45, Anton Gladky wrote:
2014-12-18 10:38 GMT+01:00 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
I don't think this is correct. Both packages are broken and should be
fixed (instead of changing
the priority).
Otherwise, they should be removed from jessie. Shipping broken packages
On 15/12/2014 15:54, Vincent COUVERT wrote:
Hello,
On 12/14/2014 10:01 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 13/12/2014 11:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:22:51 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
wrote:
On 30/05/14 at 11:29 +0900, mejiko wrote:
1)
Well, fixing the bugs would probably be a better solution. ..
Le 18 décembre 2014 11:01:52 GMT+01:00, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org a écrit
:
2014-12-18 10:57 GMT+01:00 Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org:
If the user is correct, these two packages should be removed from
Debian
asap (and
Attention Owner Of Atm card,
I have registered your ATM CARD of $2.5usd Courier Company with registration
code of ( Shipment Code awb 33xzs). Please Contact with your delivery
information such as, Your Name, Your Address and Your Telephone Number:E-mail:
(revjoe...@barid.com). Name: Rev. Joe
On 12/18/2014 10:59 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 15/12/2014 15:54, Vincent COUVERT wrote:
Hello,
On 12/14/2014 10:01 PM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
On 13/12/2014 11:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 21:22:51 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org
wrote:
On 30/05/14 at 11:29 +0900,
apophenia_0.999c+ds-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apophenia_0.999c+ds-1.dsc
apophenia_0.999c+ds.orig.tar.gz
apophenia_0.999c+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
libapophenia1_0.999c+ds-1_amd64.deb
libapophenia1-dev_0.999c+ds-1_amd64.deb
binary:libapophenia1 is NEW.
binary:libapophenia1-dbg is NEW.
binary:libapophenia1-dev is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so
Processing control commands:
severity -1 serious
Bug #773424 [tcl-vtk6] tcl-vtk6 is unusable
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
retitle -1 vtk6 loads the wrong library paths for vt libraries (/usr/lib
instead of /usr/lib/triple/)
Bug #773424 [tcl-vtk6] tcl-vtk6 is unusable
Changed Bug
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: retitle -1 vtk6 loads the wrong library paths for vt libraries
(/usr/lib instead of /usr/lib/triple/)
vtk6 is using the wrong path for the vt libraries, as trivially
evidenced by the following;
$ echo 'package require vtk'|vtk6
couldn't load file
Mon Choix Mutuelle .fr
Comparez 200 assurancessanté en un coup d'œil
COMPAREZles mutuelles
* Garantie hospitalière 20 - 25 ans--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
gap-scscp 2.1.4+ds-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-01-18
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
772869: gap-core: Trigger cycle causes dpkg to fail processing
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
gap-float 0.6.3+ds-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-01-18
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
772869: gap-core: Trigger cycle causes dpkg to fail processing
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
