Processing of vtk_5.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

2015-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
vtk_5.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: vtk_5.10.1+dfsg-1.dsc vtk_5.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz vtk_5.10.1+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz libvtk5.10_5.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb libvtk-java_5.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb libvtk5-dev_5.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

vtk_5.10.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:34:27 +0100 Source: vtk Binary: vtk-doc vtk-examples libvtk5.10 libvtk-java libvtk5-dev libvtk5.10-qt4 libvtk5-qt4-dev tcl-vtk python-vtk Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 5.10.1+dfsg-1

pytango_8.1.6-1~exp1_i386.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2015-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:23:34 +0100 Source: pytango Binary: python-pytango python3-pytango python-pytango-doc Architecture: source i386 all Version: 8.1.6-1~exp1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer:

Processed: your mail

2015-02-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: fixed 713794 5.10.1+dfsg-1 Bug #713794 [src:vtk] vtk: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Wrapping/CMakeFiles/vtkWrapPython.dir/all] Error 2 Marked as fixed in versions vtk/5.10.1+dfsg-1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Re: nifti2dicom in debian-science metapackage

2015-02-09 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:28:50PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: Dear Daniele, Le vendredi 16 janvier 2015 à 16:18 +0100, Daniele E. Domenichelli a écrit : I'm sorry if this is the wrong place, but I don't know the what is the policy for this kind of request... I would like

Re: nifti2dicom in debian-science metapackage

2015-02-09 Thread Daniele E. Domenichelli
On 09/02/15 11:19, Andreas Tille wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 09:28:50PM +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote: If you want to have your request taken into account and handled by the relevant person, you rather should open a wishlist bug against the science-neuroscience-cognitive package. See