freefem++ is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-07-25 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
freefem++ 3.37.1-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-08-31 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 792826: nlopt: FTBFS against Octave 4.0 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin

nlopt is marked for autoremoval from testing

2015-07-25 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
nlopt 2.4.2+dfsg-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-08-31 It is affected by these RC bugs: 792826: nlopt: FTBFS against Octave 4.0 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Bug#793621: transition: vtk6

2015-07-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 with 792883 793604 793605 793607 There is an uncoordinated, ongoing transition for vtk6. vtk6 failed to build on armel/armhf. Also some of the rdeps (gammaray, liggghts

Processed: transition: vtk6

2015-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 with 792883 793604 793605 793607 Bug #793621 [release.debian.org] transition: vtk6 793621 was not blocked by any bugs. 793621 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 793621: 793607, 793605, 793604, and 792883 -- 793621: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Processed: tagging 777772

2015-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 72 + pending Bug #72 [src:apophenia] apophenia: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 72: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=72 D

Processed: 777772 is fixed-upstream

2015-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 72 + fixed-upstream Bug #72 [src:apophenia] apophenia: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 72: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg

Processed: fixed 793436 in 3.3.2~r61000-3, closing 793436

2015-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 793436 3.3.2~r61000-3 Bug #793436 [src:lttoolbox] lttoolbox: FTBFS on most architectures due to symbol changes Marked as fixed in versions lttoolbox/3.3.2~r61000-3. > close 793436 Bug #793436 [src:lttoolbox] lttoolbox: FTBFS on most archite

Bug#793605: liggghts: FTBFS against VTK 6.2

2015-07-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: liggghts Version: 3.2.0+repack1-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) As can be seen on https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=liggghts&suite=unstable liggghts cannot be built with VTK 6.2. The amd64 build log ends wit

Bug#778106: rheolef: ftbfs with GCC-5

2015-07-25 Thread Matthias Klose
after fixing --- a/skit/plib2/load_chunk.h +++ b/skit/plib2/load_chunk.h @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ load_chunk (std::istream& s, RandomItera { while (iter != last) if (!(s >> *iter++)) return false; -return s; +return bool(s); } template inline @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ load_chunk (std:

Bug#778123: ftbfs with GCC-5

2015-07-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + pending this is part of the gfortran mod transition as well, and needs its build dependencies built first using gfortran 5. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/deb

Processed: Re: ftbfs with GCC-5

2015-07-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #778123 [src:slepc] slepc: ftbfs with GCC-5 Added tag(s) pending. -- 778123: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=778123 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

code-saturne_4.0.2+repack-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2015-07-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 11:58:04 +0200 Source: code-saturne Binary: code-saturne code-saturne-bin code-saturne-data code-saturne-include code-saturne-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 4.0.2+repack-1 Distribution: un

Processing of code-saturne_4.0.2+repack-1_amd64.changes

2015-07-25 Thread Debian FTP Masters
code-saturne_4.0.2+repack-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: code-saturne_4.0.2+repack-1.dsc code-saturne_4.0.2+repack.orig.tar.gz code-saturne_4.0.2+repack-1.debian.tar.xz code-saturne-bin_4.0.2+repack-1_amd64.deb code-saturne-data_4.0.2+repack-1_all

Bug#793579: python-admesh: Build-depend on python3-all-dev + python3-all, not python3-dev + python3-all

2015-07-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: python-admesh Version: 0.98.3-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu wily ubuntu-patch Hi Anton, The python-admesh package currently build-depends on python3-all and python3-dev (as well as python-all + python-dev). This is inconsisten