Bug#786082: marked as done (salome-kernel: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:04:21 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #786082,
regarding salome-kernel: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786082: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786082
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-kernel
Version: 6.5.0-8.1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-8.1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-kernel has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804872

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804875: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

salome-jobmanager |6.5.0-1 | source, amd64, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, 
powerpc, s390x
salome-jobmanager-dbg |6.5.0-1 | amd64, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, 
s390x
salome-jobmanager-dev |6.5.0-1 | amd64, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, 
s390x
salome-jobmanager-doc |6.5.0-1 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804875

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804879: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

salome-smesh |6.5.0-3 | source, amd64, armhf, i386, powerpc
salome-smesh-dbg |6.5.0-3 | amd64, armhf, i386, powerpc
salome-smesh-dev |6.5.0-3 | amd64, armhf, i386, powerpc
salome-smesh-doc |6.5.0-3 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804879

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804879: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-smesh has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804879

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#696344: marked as done (Packaging a new upstream version (6.6.0))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:04:21 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804872: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #696344,
regarding Packaging a new upstream version (6.6.0)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
696344: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696344
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: salome-kernel
Version: 6.5.0-4
Severity: whishlist
Tags: experimental

Dear Julien,

thanks for packaging Salome! Recently a new version of Salome 6.6.0 is
appeared on the official site.

By the way, the Developer Information (PTS) page
http://packages.qa.debian.org/salome-kernel
doesn't show yet the information of such upstream updates automatically.

Regards,
Andrey
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-8.1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-kernel has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804872

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804877: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-netgenplugin has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804877

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804877: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

salome-netgenplugin |6.5.0-1 | source, amd64, armhf, i386, powerpc
salome-netgenplugin-dev |6.5.0-1 | amd64, armhf, i386, powerpc
salome-netgenplugin-doc |6.5.0-1 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804877

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804875: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-jobmanager has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804875

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786002: marked as done (salome-smesh: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:06:09 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804879: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786002,
regarding salome-smesh: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786002: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786002
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-smesh
Version: 6.5.0-3
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-smesh has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804879

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804878: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-paravis has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804878

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804878: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

paraview-medreader |6.5.0-3 | amd64, armhf, i386, mips, powerpc, s390x
salome-paravis |6.5.0-3 | source, amd64, armhf, i386, mips, powerpc, s390x
salome-paravis-dev |6.5.0-3 | amd64, armhf, i386, mips, powerpc, s390x

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804878

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786256: marked as done (salome-netgenplugin: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:05:55 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804877: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786256,
regarding salome-netgenplugin: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786256: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786256
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-netgenplugin
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-netgenplugin has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804877

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804876: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-med has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804876

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804876: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

salome-med |6.5.0-3 | source, amd64, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, 
s390x
salome-med-dev |6.5.0-3 | amd64, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x
salome-med-doc |6.5.0-3 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804876

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804874: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from experimental:

salome-gui |6.5.0-5 | source, amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, 
powerpc, s390x
salome-gui-dbg |6.5.0-5 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, 
s390x
salome-gui-dev |6.5.0-5 | amd64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, 
s390x
salome-gui-doc |6.5.0-5 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804874

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786191: marked as done (salome-gui: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:09:05 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804874: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786191,
regarding salome-gui: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-gui
Version: 6.5.0-5
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-gui has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804874

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#680738: marked as done (salome-gui: links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:09:05 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804874: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #680738,
regarding salome-gui: links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible 
libraries
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
680738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680738
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: salome-gui
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1

Hello Debian Science Maintainers,
thanks for your effort to reintroduce SALOME into Debian.

However, it seems to me that one of the licensing issues that
affected the previous package [1] is still present in the
current salome-gui package.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/619662

Indeed, salome-gui is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL v2.1,
but links with libcos4-1/libomniorb4-1, which include [2] files
released under the terms of the GNU GPL v2 or later.

[2] 
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/o/omniorb-dfsg/current/copyright

This means that package salome-gui is effectively under the GNU GPL
(v2 or later).

On the other hand, salome-gui links with liboce-* packages, which
are released under the terms of the OCTPL v6.3 [3], a GPL-incompatible
license.

[3] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/o/oce/current/copyright

As a consequence, I would say that salome-gui (the binary package) is
currently undistributable, as it links with both a GPLv2-licensed
library and a GPLv2-incompatible one.


Possible solutions, in descending order of desirability:

 (A) Open CASCADE S.A.S. should be contacted and persuaded to
re-license Open CASCADE Technology under GPLv2-and-v3-compatible terms.

 (B) liboce-* packages should be substituted with a
GPLv2-and-v3-compatible replacement, if any is available.

 (C) omniORB copyright holders should be asked to add license
exceptions that give permission to link their work with code released
under the OCTPL.

As summarized in a recent thread on debian-science and debian-legal [4],
I am trying to push in the direction of solution (A), but I need help
in persuading Open CASCADE S.A.S. to switch to the GNU LGPL v2.1:
once again, please help!

[4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/06/msg00038.html


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-gui has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804874

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#717572: marked as done (salome-gui: FTBFS with paraview 4)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:09:05 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804874: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #717572,
regarding salome-gui: FTBFS with paraview 4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
717572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-gui
Version: 6.5.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream fixed-upstream
Justification: fails to build from source

salome 6.5 doesn't build against paraview 4, which is now in sid.  I
believe that is fixed in salome 7.

Cheers,
Julien
-- 
Julien Cristau  
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-gui has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804874

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804872: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

salome-kernel |  6.5.0-8.1 | source, mips64el
salome-kernel | 6.5.0-8.1+b2 | arm64, ppc64el
salome-kernel | 6.5.0-8.1+b3 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x
salome-kernel-dbg |  6.5.0-8.1 | mips64el
salome-kernel-dbg | 6.5.0-8.1+b2 | arm64, ppc64el
salome-kernel-dbg | 6.5.0-8.1+b3 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x
salome-kernel-dev |  6.5.0-8.1 | mips64el
salome-kernel-dev | 6.5.0-8.1+b2 | arm64, ppc64el
salome-kernel-dev | 6.5.0-8.1+b3 | amd64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, 
kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390x
salome-kernel-doc |  6.5.0-8.1 | all

--- Reason ---
ROM; no longer maintained, NPOASR
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 804...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/804872

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804872: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-8.1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-kernel has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804872

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: retitle 802708 to RM: gnac -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on legacy libs ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 802708 RM: gnac -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on legacy libs
Bug #802708 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnac - dead upstream, depends on legacy libs
Changed Bug title to 'RM: gnac -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on legacy libs' 
from 'RM: gnac - dead upstream, depends on legacy libs'
> severity 802708 normal
Bug #802708 [ftp.debian.org] RM: gnac -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on legacy 
libs
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 802993 RM: g2ipmsg -- dead upstream, unmaintained, unused, depends on 
> gstreamer 0.10
Bug #802993 [ftp.debian.org] RM: g2ipmsg - dead upstream, unmaintained, unused, 
depends on gstreamer 0.10
Changed Bug title to 'RM: g2ipmsg -- dead upstream, unmaintained, unused, 
depends on gstreamer 0.10' from 'RM: g2ipmsg - dead upstream, unmaintained, 
unused, depends on gstreamer 0.10'
> severity 802993 normal
Bug #802993 [ftp.debian.org] RM: g2ipmsg -- dead upstream, unmaintained, 
unused, depends on gstreamer 0.10
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign 800891 src:r-cran-afex
Bug #800891 [ftp.debian.org,r-cran-afex] r-cran-afex violates the GPL2
Bug reassigned from package 'ftp.debian.org,r-cran-afex' to 'src:r-cran-afex'.
No longer marked as found in versions 0.14-2-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #800891 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle 802995 RM: alarm-clock -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on legacy libs
Bug #802995 [ftp.debian.org] Should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to 'RM: alarm-clock -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on legacy 
libs' from 'Should this package be removed?'
> severity 802995 normal
Bug #802995 [ftp.debian.org] RM: alarm-clock -- RoQA; dead upstream, depends on 
legacy libs
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
800891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800891
802708: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802708
802993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802993
802995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802995
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804880: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-yacs has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804880

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786276: marked as done (salome-jobmanager: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:07:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804875: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786276,
regarding salome-jobmanager: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786276: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786276
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-jobmanager
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-jobmanager has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804875

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#804874: Removed package(s) from experimental

[Debian FTP Masters]

Version: 6.5.0-5+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-gui has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804874

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786236: marked as done (salome-yacs: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:08:50 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804880: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786236,
regarding salome-yacs: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786236: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786236
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-yacs
Version: 6.5.0-1
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-yacs has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804880

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786231: marked as done (salome-paravis: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:08:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804878: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786231,
regarding salome-paravis: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786231: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786231
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-paravis
Version: 6.5.0-3
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-paravis has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804878

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#786313: marked as done (salome-med: deprecation of python-support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:08:33 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#804876: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #786313,
regarding salome-med: deprecation of python-support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786313: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786313
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: salome-med
Version: 6.5.0-3
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: pysupport-deprecation



Dear Maintainer,

your package either build-depends or depends on the python-support
package, or uses dh_pysupport in debian/rules file.

python-support has been deprecated for some time, and any package
still using it should be migrated to dh_python2 and dh_python3.
Instructions on how to migrate packages to dh_python2/dh_python3 can
be found on the Debian wiki [0]. An overview of the anatomy of a
package using the pybuild and dh_python{2,3} helpers can be found in
the Python Module Style Guide [1].

Please test your package thoroughly to make sure the transition to
dh_python2/dh_python3 is done correctly and does not cause a negative
impact on your package. In particular, please test upgrades from the
current jessie and stretch/sid versions of the package.

If your package does not yet use Python 3, please consider adding
Python 3 support to your package at the same time as updating the
build system; the py3k porters can offer assistance with that [2].

[0] https://wiki.debian.org/Python/TransitionToDHPython2 [1]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide [2]
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/Python3Port

Thanks! 
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 6.5.0-3+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package salome-med has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/804876

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
  gmp_6.1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
  gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
  libgmp-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  libgmp10-doc_6.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
  libgmp10_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  libgmp3-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
  libgmpxx4ldbl_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-gencpp_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-gencpp_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-gencpp_0.5.3-1.dsc
  ros-gencpp_0.5.3.orig.tar.gz
  ros-gencpp_0.5.3-1.debian.tar.xz
  python-gencpp_0.5.3-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to 
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
  simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1.dsc
  simbody_3.5.3+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1.dsc
  simbody_3.5.3+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
  simbody_3.5.3+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-genpy_0.5.7-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:python-genpy is NEW.
source:ros-genpy is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-genlisp_0.4.15-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:python-genlisp is NEW.
source:ros-genlisp is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-roscpp-core_0.5.6-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-roscpp-core_0.5.6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-roscpp-core_0.5.6-1.dsc
  ros-roscpp-core_0.5.6.orig.tar.gz
  ros-roscpp-core_0.5.6-1.debian.tar.xz
  libcpp-common0d_0.5.6-1_amd64.deb
  libroscpp-core-dev_0.5.6-1_amd64.deb
  libroscpp-serialization0d_0.5.6-1_amd64.deb
  librostime0d_0.5.6-1_amd64.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-genlisp_0.4.15-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-genlisp_0.4.15-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-genlisp_0.4.15-1.dsc
  ros-genlisp_0.4.15.orig.tar.gz
  ros-genlisp_0.4.15-1.debian.tar.xz
  python-genlisp_0.4.15-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-roscpp-core_0.5.6-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:libcpp-common0d is NEW.
binary:libroscpp-core-dev is NEW.
binary:libroscpp-serialization0d is NEW.
binary:librostime0d is NEW.
source:ros-roscpp-core is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processing of ros-genpy_0.5.7-1_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

ros-genpy_0.5.7-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  ros-genpy_0.5.7-1.dsc
  ros-genpy_0.5.7.orig.tar.gz
  ros-genpy_0.5.7-1.debian.tar.xz
  python-genpy_0.5.7-1_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

ros-gencpp_0.5.3-1_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:python-gencpp is NEW.
source:ros-gencpp is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

vtk is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

vtk 5.10.1+dfsg-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-11-15

It is affected by these RC bugs:
798164: vtk: do not ship in stretch


-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#790284: ssm: FTBFS with glibc 2.21 and gcc-5

[YunQiang Su]

On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:02:19 -0700 Daniel Schepler  wrote:
> Source: ssm
> Version: 1.3-2
> Severity: normal
>
> From my pbuilder build log, using a setup preferring glibc and gcc-defaults
> from experimental:

I NMUed this package to unstable with the attached patch.

>
> ...
>dh_fixperms -O--dbg-package=libssm1-dbg
>dh_strip -O--dbg-package=libssm1-dbg
>dh_makeshlibs -O--dbg-package=libssm1-dbg
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols 
> file: see diff output below
> dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libssm1/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match 
> completely debian/libssm1.symbols
> --- debian/libssm1.symbols (libssm1_1.3-2+bpb6_amd64)
> +++ dpkg-gensymbolsJTEyob   2015-06-14 08:50:56.737157172 +
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@
>   _ZTSN3ssm6XAlignE@Base 1.3
>   _ZTSN3ssm8SortDistE@Base 1.3
>   _ZTSN3ssm9MultAlignE@Base 1.3
> - _ZTV7CStream@Base 1.3
> +#MISSING: 1.3-2+bpb6# _ZTV7CStream@Base 1.3
>   _ZTVN3ssm10GraphMatchE@Base 1.3
>   _ZTVN3ssm10XAlignTextE@Base 1.3
>   _ZTVN3ssm12SortMappingsE@Base 1.3
> dh_makeshlibs: failing due to earlier errors
> debian/rules:9: recipe for target 'binary' failed
> make: *** [binary] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules binary gave error exit status 
> 2
> --
> Daniel Schepler
>
>


ssm.debdiff
Description: Binary data
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:14:18 -0600
Source: gmp
Binary: libgmp10 libgmpxx4ldbl libgmp-dev libgmp10-doc libgmp3-dev
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 2:6.1.0+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team 

Changed-By: Steve M. Robbins 
Description:
 libgmp-dev - Multiprecision arithmetic library developers tools
 libgmp10   - Multiprecision arithmetic library
 libgmp10-doc - Multiprecision arithmetic library example code
 libgmp3-dev - Multiprecision arithmetic library developers tools
 libgmpxx4ldbl - Multiprecision arithmetic library (C++ bindings)
Changes:
 gmp (2:6.1.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream.
 - patches/arm-asm-nothumb.patch:
 - patches/4a6d258b467f.patch: Remove.  Applied upstream.
 .
   * libgmp10.symbols: updated for new release.
Checksums-Sha1:
 e8ef42fedfb5b5f376c30b104e2275af3b794c1f 2161 gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
 8a15b884c31483e481a855d738753cbdfea0eab3 1786120 gmp_6.1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 1e0633691c79671f5a64d8f15e04a68bc4787def 20544 gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 6899c2df742050eac1c6b1820078b9e499c4a801 628228 
libgmp-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 9cd6714815af213f58e1d767b84fd10e90312251 171966 
libgmp10-doc_6.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
 ca148dacb3b25c713e7f82df110189eddeba10bc 253634 libgmp10_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 097054c304028686ccba2529a5018e321042a41c 15024 
libgmp3-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 205f0c9418ffea4286155c9b776b83dd3346b027 22118 
libgmpxx4ldbl_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256:
 36cfe6a87e5c0b7a4b6cf4a0a373e156d5eed02b270273e5df8dc03e9210540c 2161 
gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
 78a74cfd933bbdf7e93909a6069e53e8aba8389e9b3880300c926da7a7d55632 1786120 
gmp_6.1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 d8c9470d23e66e2ad1c68599faa6b0526b1dc0bb02483b4e289ed22b43da6fe9 20544 
gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 833439f4e90ebdc5d068646e63aeb96a215499d8fbbf8b1485b23a58ac739bbe 628228 
libgmp-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 38088bf60be465f43f671e7c58210dc532e0e50cc1a6a7f302a4ec685f19d35c 171966 
libgmp10-doc_6.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
 b09b0ae2a6272f2c55c7ec7d583a15eba78b409ef6be3d845a68d908f726c731 253634 
libgmp10_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 a618f6e8302f8a8c17776901fddc92b48df3ea6442bccf57463a8d7856d96341 15024 
libgmp3-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 86b3d6fc019fea47495d4c58b766d71a79a2750d32c120a6faad4eda85da096b 22118 
libgmpxx4ldbl_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
Files:
 5e21a2dc066bf53ec7a6a49be5eb8712 2161 libs optional gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc
 2ee4311400e6ba6c561b4e652fb15408 1786120 libs optional 
gmp_6.1.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 a618d0174651d5eca8e4f712c6c7b226 20544 libs optional 
gmp_6.1.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz
 dca477abf5c8cd196d075f898cda456c 628228 libdevel optional 
libgmp-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 f122c606787a1ac083ce9b7f6a325ca1 171966 doc optional 
libgmp10-doc_6.1.0+dfsg-1_all.deb
 78a794587683778f196ec65ceeefbd6e 253634 libs optional 
libgmp10_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 0e7de49c0c1e186505e6c7475d871d8f 15024 libdevel optional 
libgmp3-dev_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb
 bab91722195c92f0e7efcaeee14519e9 22118 libs optional 
libgmpxx4ldbl_6.1.0+dfsg-1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
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=5A5H
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers