Bug#777073: marked as done (Current version doesn't seem able to factor... 1 !)
Your message dated Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:06:29 +0100 with message-id <565c8215.7090...@rezozer.net> and subject line gmp-ecm: Current version doesn't seem able to factor... 1 ! has caused the Debian Bug report #777073, regarding Current version doesn't seem able to factor... 1 ! to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 777073: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=777073 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: libecm-dev Version: 6.4.4-2 While working on sagemath-on-debian, I met the following issue : the sample code below, when compiled against sage's ECM tells me 1 is a factor of 1 ; and "No factor found" when compiled against debian's... Snark on #debian-science #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { mpz_t n, f; int res; mpz_init(n); mpz_set_d(n, 1); mpz_init(f); res = ecm_factor (f, n, 100, NULL); if (res == 0) gmp_printf("No factor found\n"); else gmp_printf("%Zd\n", f); return 0; } --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All: I guess that we can close this issue now as the package is cleaner and as the issue is rather a Sage issue. Thanks, Jerome -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWXIIJAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjmigH/23/GSGwEDjxD0KlQEKGjFwS dPEFQUofdGJFKgefrOaUvuWN7yABxRnPODln52iaMhIh3y4QXF6FH51kdasKoyt/ iHMq2e2Uk0nVmHTQP64ZiOnUN8NEW+t0NQnILZzUubXQ1xDEpNMExG2+AhUMMf3x wOxCKRcDyGifOaIULv2taT1iise/+EnVYb5LtG/WtdwSswCvXg1eeBFqwhdzQk5g jnsQVGCFWwwCtNcH2gtP13jWYx8f794CuskAHTtOEBBjqJ8IlBNKVafBOfzTxrpu 1AYaRjGoqptNpZl75Ce+I6NhspNlF8il5lL7eB68impY8bOhfWXDzG4rv/ncvVU= =vmDL -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message --- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#806769: FTBS: failed test on mipsel architecture: random Bus error emitted from GOMP
Package: normaliz Version: 3.0.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hello Folks: On mipsel architecture, normaliz is subject to random `Bus error(s)' that are emitted from GOMP. A GDB backtrace typically reads: --8><-- [...] Starting program: /home/calculus/normaliz/normaliz-00/normaliz/_build/normaliz -h test-h/cut.in [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [New Thread 0x77913450 (LWP 24948)] [New Thread 0x77113450 (LWP 24949)] [New Thread 0x76913450 (LWP 24950)] Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error. [Switching to Thread 0x77113450 (LWP 24949)] 0x77b1ef60 in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from /usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 #0 0x77b1ef60 in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from /usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 #1 0x77b1ee7c in GOMP_loop_ull_dynamic_start () from /usr/lib/mipsel-linux-gnu/libgomp.so.1 Backtrace stopped: frame did not save the PC (gdb) --><8 For the record, Jerome -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) Versions of packages normaliz depends on: ii normaliz-bin 3.0.0+ds-1 normaliz recommends no packages. Versions of packages normaliz suggests: ii singular 4.0.2-p2+ds-1 -- no debconf information -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Fwd: Bug#806754: RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix]
Forwarded Message Subject: Bug#806754: RFS: gmp-ecm/6.4.4+ds-5 [FTBFS fix] Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:57:02 + Resent-From: Jerome BenoitResent-To: debian-bugs-d...@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Mentors Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 22:52:48 +0100 From: Jerome Benoit Reply-To: Jerome Benoit , 806...@bugs.debian.org To: Debian Bug Tracking System Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors: I am looking for a sponsor for the package gmp-ecm [1] that I am maintaining on behalf of the Debian Science-Team. This version fix the FTBFS issue #806619 that pointed that the gmp-ecm package did not honour the arch/indep built scheme: this release introduce a fully working arch/indep built scheme. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/gmp-ecm.git -- System Information: Debian Release: Jessie* APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.7-ckt11-amd64-mbp62 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
pyoperators is marked for autoremoval from testing
pyoperators 0.13.6-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-12-19 It is affected by these RC bugs: 805678: pyoperators: FTBFS: NameError: global name 'FFTW_DEFAULT_NUM_THREADS' is not defined -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#805893: Please confirm the patch.
I tested this patch. It works well for mips64el. On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:40 AM, YunQiang Suwrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> This is the relevant portion of the proposed patch: >> >>> ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),ppc64el) >>> DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mno-altivec >>> +DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mno-altivec >>> +endif >>> +# Build without Altivec to prevent FTBFS on ppc64el. >>> +ifneq (,$(filter mips64%el mips64%el,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH))) >>> +DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot >>> +DEB_CXXFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND += -mxgot >>> endif >> >> But the explanation is: >> >>> filter mips%64 mips%64el,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH) >>> is due to we may has some other mips64 architectures in future, >>> for example: mips64r6{el}. >> >> The filter string differs between the patch and explanation: > > The patch is correct. > > Sorry for it. > >> >> filter mips64%el mips64%el >> >> and >> >> filter mips%64 mips%64el. >> >> One is twice the same (typo?), the other has the percent sign placed >> differently. >> >> Please confirm the correct filter command, otherwise I cannot apply this >> patch. >> >> Thanks, >> Ghis > > > > -- > YunQiang Su -- YunQiang Su -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Processing of code-saturne_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_amd64.changes
code-saturne_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: code-saturne_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1.dsc code-saturne_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1.debian.tar.xz code-saturne-bin_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_amd64.deb code-saturne-data_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_all.deb code-saturne-doc_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_all.deb code-saturne-include_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_amd64.deb code-saturne_4.1.1+repack-2~exp1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Bug#806703: Should suggest opencv-doc
Package: libopencv-dev Severity: minor I believe all development packages should Suggest their own documentation (if such documentation exists). Thanks! -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers