Bug#805193: aster: FTBFS: Fatal Error: finclude/petscsys.h: No such file or directory

2016-01-24 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Peter On 13 December 2015 at 01:17, peter green wrote: > On 12/12/15 19:01, peter green wrote: >> >> >> New debdiff attatched, still no intent to NMU. > > Sorry, debdiff at > http://debdiffs.raspbian.org/main/a/aster/aster_11.5.0%2bdfsg2-3%2brpi1.debdiff Thanks for your

Processing of guiqwt_3.0.2-1_source.changes

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
guiqwt_3.0.2-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: guiqwt_3.0.2-1.dsc guiqwt_3.0.2.orig.tar.gz guiqwt_3.0.2-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Processing of mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1_amd64.changes

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1.dsc mathicgb_1.0~git20150904.orig.tar.gz mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1.debian.tar.xz libmathicgb-dbg_1.0~git20150904-1_amd64.deb

python-qwt_0.5.5-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:47:24 +0100 Source: python-qwt Binary: python-qwt python3-qwt python-qwt-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.5.5-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Bug#798601: limereg: FTBFS on mips/mipsel

2016-01-24 Thread Roelof Berg
Wow, thanks a lot Jurica ! I'll take care of it asap. On 17.01.2016 19:52, Jurica Stanojkovic wrote: User: debian-m...@lists.debian.org Hello, I have found that changing -fstack-protector-strong to -fstack-protector (for test or for entire source) does make this issue disappear on mipsel.

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi James, >I have been working with upstream to port Poly/ML to additional architectures, >and have backported these changes. I have uploaded 5.5.2-4 to mentors; could >you >please check it and then upload it? wonderful, lets review: 1) you took over the package maintenance, can I see a

mathicgb_1.0~git20150904-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 20:21:41 -0400 Source: mathicgb Binary: mathicgb libmathicgb-dev libmathicgb0 libmathicgb-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.0~git20150904-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer:

guiqwt_3.0.2-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 09:08:16 +0100 Source: guiqwt Binary: python-guiqwt python3-guiqwt python-guiqwt-doc Architecture: source Version: 3.0.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

rheolef is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
rheolef 6.6-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-01 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 811229: blacs-mpi: libblacs-mpich1: missing dependency on libblacs-mpich1 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Bug#812560: libvigraimpex: should support multiarch

2016-01-24 Thread Daniel Stender
Source: libvigraimpex Version: 1.10.0+dfsg-11 Severity: wishlist As suggested by Tobias Frost, Vigra should support multiarch. DS -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64

freecad is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
freecad 0.15.4671+dfsg1-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-02-15 It is affected by these RC bugs: 811239: freecad: FTBFS: error: template-id 'compute<>' for 'Eigen::FullPivLU -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

getfem++ is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
getfem++ 4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-01 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 811229: blacs-mpi: libblacs-mpich1: missing dependency on libblacs-mpich1 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

mumps is marked for autoremoval from testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
mumps 4.10.0.dfsg-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-01 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 811229: blacs-mpi: libblacs-mpich1: missing dependency on libblacs-mpich1 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

h5py_2.5.0-2_i386.changes is NEW

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:python-h5py-dbg is NEW. binary:python3-h5py-dbg is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are

Processing of h5py_2.5.0-2_i386.changes

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
h5py_2.5.0-2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: h5py_2.5.0-2.dsc h5py_2.5.0-2.debian.tar.xz python-h5py-dbg-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_i386.deb python-h5py-dbg_2.5.0-2_i386.deb python-h5py-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_i386.deb python-h5py-doc_2.5.0-2_all.deb

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco, > 1) you took over the package maintenance, can I see a post where the current > uploaders acked the change? Please see the entirety of this thread in debian-science: https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2016/01/msg00035.html > 2) a patch against testsuite not mentioned in

Bug#793788: marked as done (python-h5py: Please provide python3 modules)

2016-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:49:25 + with message-id <56a4d665.1040...@gmail.com> and subject line Already fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #793788, regarding python-h5py: Please provide python3 modules to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processing of pcl_1.7.2-14_amd64.changes

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
libpcl1.7-dbg_1.7.2-14_amd64.deb has incorrect size; deleting it Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: found 812298 in 0.3.0-3, tagging 812462

2016-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 812298 0.3.0-3 Bug #812298 [libconsole-bridge-dev] FTBFS: error: 'else' without a previous 'if' Marked as found in versions console-bridge/0.3.0-3. > tags 812462 + sid stretch Bug #812462 [ganglia] ganglia: [FTBFS, patch] out-of-date and

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer >segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one >part of the >build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code 1, >without printing anything. That’s on my list of things

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi again, >Is there any way in which I could get access to an armel porter box to try and >work out what’s causing the failure? as a normal contributor not, as a DM yes, after you requested the access, as a DD yes. that said, I'm happy to test patches if you have some, but I can't easily

Processed: Re: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block 650601 by -1  Bug #650601 [release.debian.org] transition: libpng 1.6 650601 was blocked by: 641889 809949 810197 662443 810201 662476 636998 809941 650567 809879 809955 809898 809873 810176 809960 809883 810202 809948 742569 810175 809938 809951 809942

Bug#811370: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: block 650601 by -1  On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:59:43 +0100 Daniel Stender wrote: > I've begun to test the patch and for starters it doesn't clearly apply to the > code of the recent upstream tarball (they haven't released for too long, +1116 commits) ... >  >

Bug#809881: 3depict: FTBFS with libpng16

2016-01-24 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: block -1 by 811370 B-D is RC-buggy. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

scscp-imcce 1.0.1+ds1-2 MIGRATED to testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the scscp-imcce source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.1+ds1-1 Current version: 1.0.1+ds1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

mlpack 2.0.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the mlpack source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.0.12-5 Current version: 2.0.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

r-cran-mime 0.4-2 MIGRATED to testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the r-cran-mime source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 0.4-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

Processing of h5py_2.5.0-2_amd64.changes

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
h5py_2.5.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: h5py_2.5.0-2.dsc h5py_2.5.0-2.debian.tar.xz python-h5py-dbg-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_amd64.deb python-h5py-dbg_2.5.0-2_amd64.deb python-h5py-dbgsym_2.5.0-2_amd64.deb python-h5py-doc_2.5.0-2_all.deb

h5py_2.5.0-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
h5py_2.5.0-2.dsc: Does not match file already existing in the pool. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

gnuplot5 5.0.2+dfsg1-2 MIGRATED to testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the gnuplot5 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 5.0.2+dfsg1-1 Current version: 5.0.2+dfsg1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day

r-cran-statmod 1.4.23-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the r-cran-statmod source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.4.22-1 Current version: 1.4.23-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

r-cran-coin 1.1-2-1 MIGRATED to testing

2016-01-24 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the r-cran-coin source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1-0-1 Current version: 1.1-2-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I uploaded it a few seconds ago, hopefully it will appear before the next dinstall (due in 12 minutes), and then start building everywhere. BTW nitpick, usually on changelog when a person takes over a package maintenance is used to say somthing like "take over the package maintenance - thanks

polyml_5.5.2-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 13:45:16 + Source: polyml Binary: polyml libpolyml-dev libpolyml6 Architecture: source Version: 5.5.2-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread James Clarke
Hi Gianfranco (cc’d Lionel and Achim as this upload officially makes me uploader), Many thanks; I’ll push the changes to debian-science/polyml.git. Regards, James > On 24 Jan 2016, at 19:36, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Signed in a few minutes! > >

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread James Clarke
Oh right, I wasn’t aware such a thing was the done thing; I was just using xindy (just so happened to see that someone took over maintenance of it on debian-devel) as a reference. Of course it goes without saying that I’m grateful for all the work Lionel and Achim have done on it; I hope nobody

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Signed in a few minutes! thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers, Gianfranco Il Domenica 24 Gennaio 2016 14:54, James Clarke ha scritto: Hi Gianfranco, > 1) you took over the package maintenance, can I see a post where the current > uploaders acked the change?

Bug#811370: libvigraimpex: FTBFS in sid: test suite failure due to pynum 1.10

2016-01-24 Thread Daniel Stender
On 24.01.2016 18:04, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: block 650601 by -1 > > Hi Daniel, > > any progress? > > I'm nagging because this library is a reverse B-D for some pacakages -- > blocking the libpng transition. > > Tobi Hi Tobias, I can't get the isolated "compatibility fixes for numpy

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Sure, thanks for the kind words for the former maintainers :) Btw s390x and x32 just failed to build, you might want to poke upstream about a porting, and ping me about testing patches on porter boxes :) If you want ti maintain some other packages you might even consider applying for Debian

r-cran-yaml_2.1.13-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

2016-01-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:11:52 +0100 Source: r-cran-yaml Binary: r-cran-yaml Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.1.13-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Science Team

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

2016-01-24 Thread James Clarke
I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one part of the build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code 1, without printing anything. That’s on my list of things to talk to