Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-14 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
I see your point, so what do I do? Should I file a bug report against binutils? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#830681: trilinos-all-dev: Updating binutils breaks trilinos

2016-07-10 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: trilinos-all-dev Version: 12.6.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, The latest update of binutils to version 2.26.1-1 makes it imopssible to compile against trilinos. The linker complains /usr/bin/ld: warning: libbfd-2.26-system.so, needed by

Bug#828987: libpetsc3.6-dev: Updating openmpi breaks usage of PETSc

2016-06-29 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: libpetsc3.6-dev Version: 3.6.4.dfsg1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, Every time package openmpi is updated PETSc is rendered unusable by an internal preprocessor directive, resulting in the error

Bug#787796: fenics fresh installation is broken

2015-06-05 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
might be due to a version mismatch in one of the dependencies [I remember there was little mess during the migration from 1.4.0 to 1.5.0]. Best regards, Massimiliano Leoni -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2015-05-04 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Hi Ralf, Thanks for your answer, but you are necroposting this bug. The issue was solved long ago, it was related to a transition from 1.3 to 1.4. The situation you described is an issue in testing at the moment, as some of fenics packages are version 1.5 and others 1.4, breaking the whole

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2014-11-04 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
? # apt-get -s dist-upgrade Johannes On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Massimiliano Leoni leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com wrote: Package: fenics Version: 1:1.4.0.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, since about last week apt-get dist-upgrade proposes me a huge update involving

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2014-10-28 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
you still have this problem? If so, can you please give us some more information? For instance, what do you get when you run the following command? # apt-get -s dist-upgrade Johannes On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Massimiliano Leoni leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com wrote: Package

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

2014-10-24 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
Package: fenics Version: 1:1.4.0.1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, since about last week apt-get dist-upgrade proposes me a huge update involving 200+ packages, whose side effect is to have fenics - and all packages coming with it - removed from the system. I would guess it's a dependency

[Paraview on Jessie] Rescale over time feature broken, patch released

2014-10-22 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
to solve the problem. http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/14052/ Could you please apply it and update the debian package? This is a very fundamental feature and I wouldn't like to manually install or compile another version to have it working. Thanks in advance, Massimiliano Leoni P.s. Sorry

Bug#766406: paraview: Rescale to all timesteps feature broken, but patch released

2014-10-22 Thread Massimiliano Leoni
://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/14052/ Could you please apply the patch and update the debian package? You can confirm the bug by comparing the paraview package in the debian repos with the paraview binaries downloadable form paraview's website. Thanks Massimiliano Leoni -- System Information