Hi friend!
I've received something awesome that is going to surprise you, just take a
look http://www.podpor.ru/permit.php?UE9qZXVjbGlkQHBhY2thZ2VzLmRlYmlhbi5vcmc-
Regards, Mathieu Malaterre
-
From time to time this website may also include links to other websites. These
links
Hey,
I think I've very good news for you, it will likely be a wonder for, I am
sure you will just love it! Just take a look
http://www.lessonsfromutopia.com/so.php?UE9qZXVjbGlkQHBhY2thZ2VzLmRlYmlhbi5vcmc-
See you around, Mathieu Malaterre
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi,
I've just found some information that seemed to be very useful, please take
a look https://is.gd/7xnTo6
Warm regards, Mathieu Malaterre
From: jeuclid [mailto:jeuc...@packages.debian.org]
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 8:05 AM
To: wer...@forsbring.no
Subject: Yer mum is a cow m8
Dear,
Just writing to ask how are you doing and to to show you something really
cool, just take a look http://bit.do/dxPjE
Mathieu Malaterre
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Source: vtk
Version: 5.8.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
Since #798164 there is basically no point in shipping vtkdata with stretch.
-M
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: src:flann
Please remove me from the Uploaders list in d/control. I cannot do it myself:
$ git push
Counting objects: 5, done.
Delta compression using up to 2 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (5/5), done.
Writing objects: 100% (5/5), 548 bytes | 0 bytes/s, done.
Total 5 (delta 4),
Package: src:opencv
Version: 2.4.9.1+dfsg-2.1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to also build DICOM support:
-DWITH_GDCM=ON \
Thanks
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: libvtk6-dev
Version: 6.3.0+dfsg1-1
Severity: important
Affects: src:gdcm
Affects: src:vtk-dicom
I am not sure what (when?) happen, but the value for
vtkWrappingJava_RUNTIME_LIBRARY_DIRS seems a bit odd to me:
$ grep -r vtkWrappingJava_RUNTIME_LIBRARY_DIRS /usr/lib/cmake/vtk-6.3/
Source: vmtk
Severity: important
User: ma...@debian.org
Usertags: stretch2000
This is a continued operation since src:jasper removal for stretch
release.
src:openjpeg will be removed from Debian for the stretch release (and
following that, the archive in general). For more information see:
Seems like the list needs to also contains:
doc_index.stop.gz
Error message is;
Reading stop-words from /usr/share/doc/vtk6-doc/doxygen/doc_index.stop...
doc_index.pl: unable to open stop words list
/usr/share/doc/vtk6-doc/doxygen/doc_index.stop
Problem building full-text index
Package: vtk6-doc
Version: 6.2.0+dfsg1-6
Severity: important
#610964 is back in vtk6-doc.
Please exclude *.pl from dh_compress. Both doc_index.pl and
doc_header2doxygen.pl needs to be excluded from compression step.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared a GDCM-2.6 upload that uses the compressed scripts, but
> since depending on files from /usr/share/doc is a policy violation, I'd
> suggest the following 2-step procedure to get rid of the problem:
>
>
Control: tags -1 upstream fixed-upstream patch
See
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/11207/patch_numeric-ublas-storage.hpp.diff
and
https://github.com/v4hn/ublas/commit/78eecc8bbf035c01316647839be4094748f8e77d
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Control: severity -1 wishlist
There is an odd behavior of COPY_ONLY + IMMEDIATE that is not
compatible with the new cmake COPYONLY.
It leads to:
[ 98%] Building CXX object
Utilities/VTK/CMakeFiles/vtkgdcm.dir/vtkgdcmInstantiator.cxx.o
cd /tmp/gdcm-2.4.4/obj-i586-linux-gnu/Utilities/VTK &&
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
As per upstream bug report says...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcm=i386=2.4.4-4=1438945953
[...]
CMake Warning (dev) at
/usr/lib/vtk-5.8/CMake/vtkMakeInstantiator.cmake:142 (CONFIGURE_FILE):
configure_file called with unknown argument(s):
COPY_ONLY
Call Stack (most recent call first):
Package: vtk-doc
Version: 5.8.0-17.6
vtk-doc package is enormous. I doubt the Microsoft's HTML Help Workshop
generated files are of any use on Debian system. Please remove them they
are 33M each.
Ref:
http://www.doxygen.nl/config.html#cfg_generate_htmlhelp
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing
Package: vtk
Version: 5.8.0-17.5
Affects: src:gdcm
Seems like vtk is using COPY_ONLY while COPYONLY is expected.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
The problem with these files is that they are listed in
That is a different issue. AFAIK python stuff should be within the
python binary package (python-vtk6), not within the -dev package...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: libvtk6-dev
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-4
Severity: serious
As per Debian Policy §10.2:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries
[...]
You must make sure that you use only released versions of shared
libraries to build your packages; otherwise other users will not
Control: retitle -1 No SOVERSION in library
Actually looking at the file, I can see:
$ readelf -d ./usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libvtkRenderingCoreJava.so
[...]
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libjawt.so]
[...]
Since libjawt.so can only be loaded by the `java` process, I
Package: tcl-vtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-4
Severity: grave
This is not clear how one should use tcl-vtk6, it does not provide the
wish interpreter anymore (aka `vtk` runtime binary). I do not believe
the package is usable by anyone.
If I build vtk6 package locally and execute it:
$ sudo apt-get
Control: severity -1 grave
Suggest != Recommends
The package *as-is* is not usable at all. Even installing
`libvtk6-dev` does not make it work, did you at least use this package
?
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: tags -1 - patch
Just for clarity, because I am really trying to use vtk6 java binding:
$ sudo apt-get install libvtk6-dev libvtk6-java vtk6-examples
$ javac -classpath /usr/share/java/vtk6.jar Cone.java
$ java -jar /usr/share/java/vtk6.jar Cone
no main manifest attribute, in
Package: libvtk6-dev
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-4
Severity: important
It does not make much sense to ship python files within the -dev package:
$ links -dump https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/libvtk6-dev/filelist
[...]
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/python2.7/site-packages/vtk/__init__.py
Control: tags -1 patch
Since package maintainer decided not to use the cmake based build
system, I do not see the need to install pseudo *.cmake files ?
ITK should simply use a dummy find_package file (not tested), eg:
$ cat FindDoubleConversion.cmake
find_path(DC_INCLUDE_DIR
Control: found -1 6.1.0+dfsg2-3
Versionned tk is still there, right:
$ grep tk8.6 debian/control
tk8.6-dev,
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Package: vtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg2-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Seems like vtk6 requires a particular libgl2ps-dev version, it
currently fails to build on wheezy:
/home/mathieu/Kitware/vtk6-6.1.0+dfsg2/Rendering/GL2PS/vtkGL2PSUtilities.cxx:
In static member function ‘static void
Control: tags -1 pending
See https://bugs.debian.org/761413#21
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Graham Inggs gra...@nerve.org.za wrote:
I believe viennacl should B-D on opencl-dev instead of libopencl1.
opencl-dev is a virtual package, so probably 'ocl-icd-opencl-dev |
opencl-dev' instead.
See #760232.
I always forgot that buildds needs a real package
Control: tags -1 patch
Same patch as :
https://bugs.debian.org/761528#10
pyviennacl needs the -dev package for opencl.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: tags -1 patch
I believe viennacl should B-D on opencl-dev instead of libopencl1.
As per build log:
[...]
-- Could NOT find OPENCL (missing: OPENCL_LIBRARY)
CMake Warning at cmake/ViennaCLCommon.cmake:151 (export):
Cannot create package registry file:
[...]
The *.so symlink is
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote:
If you'd like me to NMU, I have the build I've just done and would be
happy to sign and upload it.
Please do. Thanks much !
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: reassign -1 python-vtk6
Control: severity -1 grave
No way the log from OP applies to vtk5.8 (vtkCommonCore is vtk6 only).
Reassigning to vtk6
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: reassign -1 python-vtk 5.8.0-17.3
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
2014-07-22 12:52 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org:
Control: reassign -1 python-vtk6
Control: severity -1 grave
No way the log from OP applies to vtk5.8 (vtkCommonCore
Package: vtk6-doc
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-5
Severity: important
This is sort of a duplicate of 610964. Third party app expect the perl
scripts to not be compressed. Marking as important, but should be
grave since it will make package such as GDCM FTBFS.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
severity 75 serious
thanks
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
2014-06-11 7:45 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org:
Again, stop doing it!
You're the one doing the ping-pong. I did explain the severity in my
original post, you did not (solely
Package: libvtk6.1
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
This package provides 355 shared lib (different SONAME, but SOVERSION
set to the same value). However as per policy:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-runtime
[...]
If you have several shared
Package: vtk6
Severity: wishlist
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Tags: patch
Past vtk 5.x package did provide man page for command line util. See patch at:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/vtk.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=47fa84ea33b8d0726785052297634e3d32ed4130;hb=HEAD#l210
--
Control: tags -1 patch
Patch can be found in past vtk 5.x package:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/vtk.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=47fa84ea33b8d0726785052297634e3d32ed4130;hb=HEAD#l210
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Could you copy/paste the compilation error ?
Technically the package should build fine, see:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mrmpi.html
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: libvtk6-dev
Severity: important
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Tags: patch
There is no reason to provide the documentation (HTML pages) within
libvtk6-dev package, use vtk6-doc package instead.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: vtk6
Severity: important
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Tag: patch
Remove md5 file from doxygen output. This was done previously in vtk5.8 package
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/vtk.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=47fa84ea33b8d0726785052297634e3d32ed4130;hb=HEAD#l96
--
Package: libvtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Severity: grave
Please get rid of package libvtk6 ASAP. This is a enormous collection
of very different modules. It should clearly be split into
sub-package. I am marking this as grave since it make the package
completely useless, one need to install 363
Package: libvtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
VTK6 is using a convenient copy of xdmf2. This is in violation of
debian policy §4.13.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Package: libvtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
VTK6 is using a convenient copy of sqlite. This is in violation of
debian policy §4.13.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Package: libvtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
VTK6 is using a convenient copy of jsoncpp. This is in violation of
debian policy §4.13.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Package: libvtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
VTK6 is using a convenient copy of alglib. This is in violation of
debian policy §4.13.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Package: libvtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
VTK6 is using a convenient copy of netcdf. This is in violation of
debian policy §4.13.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-embeddedfiles
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Package: libvtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Please re-introduct -Qt package from previous package distribution.
Currenly all *Qt libs are shipped within a single libvtk6 package,
this is a very bad idea.
In the past we had to split the Qt package to allow smooth Qt3 - Qt4
Package: vtk6
Severity: serious
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Tags: patch
Please do not hardcode TCL/TK version in vtk6 package, this will
require source upload for the next transition and make it hard to
backport package.
Simply changing tcl8.6-dev and tk8.6-dev to version less equivalent works.
--
clone 750200 -1
reassign -1 libvtk5.8
severity -1 important
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@43-1.org wrote:
On 06/02/2014 14:59, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
thanks for your help
been there in the first place
at all).
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
severity 750191 important
thanks
Please do not set such high severity for all bugs.
Anton
2014-06-02 14:28 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org:
Package: libvtk6
Severity
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
2014-06-02 15:56 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Malaterre ma...@debian.org:
Packages are being rebuild against vtk6 for jessie, while freeze
period is almost here, this is what I called 'force'. Eg:
Yes, I used VTK6 for 2 of my packages
Package: libvtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Please provide a symbol file.
Thanks
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Package: libvtk6
Version: 6.1.0+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
libvtk6 package is a bad copy/paste from libvtk5 package. It does not
use proper SOVERSION naming as required by debian policy
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html#s-sharedlibs-runtime
[...]
The run-time shared
Package: vtk
Severity: grave
vtk package fails to build on kfreebdsd. error is:
1 problem (1 warning)[100%] Generating ../../java/vtk/AxesActor.class
--
1. ERROR in /«PKGBUILDDIR»/Build/java/vtk/vtkJavaTesting.java (at line 108)
public void run() {
^
The method run() of
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Anton Gladky gl...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Mathieu,
could you please let me know how to reproduce the bug?
Sure:
https://bugs.debian.org/747108#32
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: reopen -1
I think the patch was done the opposite way. To fix the bug instead of
the symptoms the vtkIOGeometry should not expose transitive linking
property this is bad practice.
Generated file should instead looks like
set_target_properties(vtkIOGeometry PROPERTIES
On 4/1/14, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On March 31, 2014 10:58:28 AM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: libvtk6
Clearly there is something missing here. libvtk6 can be co-installed
with libvtk5.8. VTK API (ABI too) is completely incompatible in
between those two versions
As explained in details libs have different SONAME (vtkCommon !=
vtkCommonCore) however they provide the same symbols (up to the ABI
diff). This is bad (tm) !
On 4/1/14, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/1/14, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
On March 31, 2014 10
Package: vtk6
Severity: grave
I cannot use libvtk6-dev, it always request for stuff I do not need/do
not use. Technically this will breaks gdcm compilation (maybe other?)
when we move to vtk6, marking as grave.
[*]
CMake Error at /usr/lib/cmake/vtk-6.0/VTKTargets.cmake:1519 (message):
The
Package: vtk6
Severity: grave
Tag: fixed-upstream
Package is broken:
CMake Error at Utilities/VTK/CMakeLists.txt:22 (include):
include could not find load file:
/usr/lib/cmake/vtk-6.0/vtkMakeInstantiator.cmake
-- Performing Test VTK_HAS_SMARTVOLUMEMAPPER
-- Performing Test
According to :
http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/13917/
[...]
We tried to cut down on what was auto-included, the instantiator is
not built by default with VTK anymore, and we are deprecating it. I
think people who want to use it should include it explicitly, and they
will need additional
64 matches
Mail list logo