Re: python3 statsmodels?

2017-06-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
>> statsmodels is maintained by Debian science team >> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/statsmodels) so i suggest to contact >> them directly (CCed them here) > > Why? Is there any specific reason? Wouldn't it make sense to bring > everything under one umbrella. because if you want to get an

Re: python3 statsmodels?

2017-06-20 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:18 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > I see that there is no statsmodels package for python3 in Stretch. > > % apt-cache search statsmodels python3 > python3-seaborn - statistical visualization library statsmodels is maintained by Debian

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

2016-12-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
> They are still, what the name suggests: candidates, with no confirmation > to be useful in a production environment. I don't see why they should > ever migrate to testing (as they did in 1.11.1rc.1). Last time, we had > an numpy RC in testing for more than four months (2016-05-06 to >

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

2016-12-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Sure; what I also don't understand is why numpy pushes its RC and betas > into unstable instead of experimental (and then maybe check or asks for > checking for the reverse deps). This makes it harder to revert if there

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

2016-12-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > In my initial response I mentioned skiping the test. However, I > intended to discuss this first since simply hiding the eyes from an > upgrading problem is not the prefered way to go. youre not closing your eyes to a

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

2016-12-21 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > Hi Adrian and Anton, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > > it seems the recent upgra

Re: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

2016-12-20 Thread Sandro Tosi
> it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other > packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether > you are either able to suggest patches to get the tests working with the > new interface of numpy again or whether it might be sensible to revert > the

Re: Wheezy backport of nlopt

2015-07-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 09:37:40AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: just a heads up that 'm going to backport nlopt to Wheezy. Could you then push your changes in the repo, i.e. on the wheezy-backport branch? Do I have

Wheezy backport of nlopt

2015-07-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello, just a heads up that 'm going to backport nlopt to Wheezy. Cheers, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers