Hi Andreas,
I marked the package for accept, but this package seems to be a good candidate
for GPL-2+ ...
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Johannes,
one of our trainees had a look at your package and found:
* software last changed 9 years ago
* pkg-config file in wrong directory
* licence infos correct
* some copyright holder missing from copyright file. example:
orocos-bfl-0.8.0/src/pdf/linearanalyticconditionalgaussian.h:
Hi Doug,
according to cohomCalg-0.32/manual/latex_source/manual.tex:
The lightbulb image used in the application logo was made by
\href{http://dragonartz.wordpress.com/}{DragonArt} and is used under the
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/}{Creative Commons
Hi Drew,
one of our trainess had a look at your package and found the following
stuff. He is nice and doesn't want to reject the package but just have
your comments :-).
Thanks!
Thorsten
Not lintian-clean:
* package-has-unnecessary-activation-of-ldconfig-trigger (1)
*
Hi Drew,
one of our trainees had a look at your package and found:
* copyright file, while autogenerated and unreadable, incomplete. missing for
example:
test/unit/cpp/mesh/MeshColoring.cpp:// Copyright (C) 2016 Garth N. Wells
Is there a reason why you manually added a debu package?
Hi Philip,
please mention Joyent in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Ole,
I marked your package for accept, but shouldn't that be better LGPL-2.1+
instead of only LGPL-2.1?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Drew,
I am sorry, but as CC-Attribution-ShareAlike is not yet listed
in /usr/share/common-licenses/ the full text should be in your
debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload
Hi Daniel,
according to LICENSE, Microsoft is now copyright holder as well.
Also Keras-2.1.1/docs/templates/applications.md mentions other licenses that
possibly should appear in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand
Hi Drew,
please mention
sasview-4.1.2/src/sas/sasgui/guiframe/images/report.png
in your debian/copyright.
While you are at it, please also take care of all those:
E: sasview-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file
usr/share/doc/sasview-doc/html/dev/api/modules.html You may use the
Hi Andreas,
almost perfect, but the clause "or (at your option) any later version"
does not match the entry in DESCRIPTION.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Andreas,
I marked your package for accept, but please have another look at
Matching/src/scythematrix.*
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Andrius,
please also mention at least
cod-tools-2.0/src/externals/spglib/pyspglib/test/vasp.py
cod-tools-2.0/src/externals/spglib/*
in your debian/copyright.
If you name a license as GPL-2, the text should not contain the clause:
"or (at your option) any later version."
Thanks!
Thorsten
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
Fixed in new upload.
great, ... and accepted.
I remember times when this kind of minor issues were part of an
"accepted" mail since you trusted the maintainer to fix the issue
in the next issue. Was anything wrong with this approach?
Hi Drew,
I marked your package for accept, but there are some issues found by one of our
trainees:
* all html files include , which is
reported by lintian
* html files for sources are not regenerated
* a lot of autogenerated interface files for c-to-fortran, not rebuilt
Please take care of
Hi Andreas,
please remove the term "or (at your option) any later version" from the GPL-3
license block.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi Andreas,
please also mention
Copyright 2007-2009 Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which
Hi Andreas,
according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-3.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Andreas,
according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-3.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Andreas,
according to DESCRIPTION the license is only GPL-2. I also found files with
LGPL being mentioned. Those should also appear in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you
Hi Drew,
please mention
periodictable-1.5.0/periodictable/cromermann.py
in your debian/copyright.
Please take also care of all those lintian errors:
E: python-periodictable-doc: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't
Hi Anton,
according to AUTHORS:
# This is the official list of benchmark authors for copyright purposes.
So shouldn't that list appear in your debian/copyright?
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you
as requested by private email ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Drew,
please mention the files that are licensed under GPL and Expat
and take care of all those lintian errors.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Anton,
I marked the package for accept, but please take care of:
W: gmsh source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line 221)
W: gmsh source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-2+ (paragraph
at line 97)
W: gmsh source:
Hi Diane,
please also mention at least Erik Tollerud, Chris Wanstrath and
Stefan van der Walt in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Doug,
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Doug Torrance wrote:
This package was rejected from NEW several months ago for the same reason,
and I thought I'd fixed it prior to the re-upload, but maybe not. :)
hmm, before this passes out of my mind again, please reupload and ping me.
Is there anything
Hi Doug,
according to manual.tex:
The lightbulb image used in the application logo was made by
\href{http://dragonartz.wordpress.com/}{DragonArt} and is
used under the
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/}{Creative Commons
Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0}
Hi,
at least
bayespy-0.5.6/bayespy/inference/vmp/nodes/logistic.py
should be also mentioned in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Andreas,
I am going to reject this package now ..
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Leopold,
V8/inst/doc/v8_intro.html doesn't really look like the preferred form for
modifications. So please ask upstream for the real source of this file.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you
Hi Leoppold,
please mention Cory LaViska in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Leopold,
if your package is licensed under GPL-3, you should not use the
GPL-3+ template in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi Pierre,
please mention the license/copyright holder of libmseed-2.19.2/genutils.c
in your debian/copyright.
Please don't forget the information at the end of that file.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected,
Hi Dima,
as I didn't find the depedency mpi-default-run in the archive, I assume
that this is a typo.
Please reupload the package if I missed it somewhere ...
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you
Hi Andreas,
please add SIL OFL 1.1 to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
as requested by email ...
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Doug,
according to cohomCalg-0.31d/manual/latex_source/manual.tex:
The lightbulb image used in the application logo was made by
\href{http://dragonartz.wordpress.com/}{DragonArt} and is used
under the \href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/}
{Creative Commons
Hi Andreas,
according to the file header survey/R/olr.R is GPL-2 and missing in
your debian/copyright.
>From the policy " ... a verbatim copy of its copyright information ..."
does not match with "... for simplicity reasons ...", so that should
be GPL-2+ and not GPL-3.
All rda files are
Hi Andreas,
those should be mentioned:
Copyright (C) 2016 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Copyright M. P. Wand 1997-2009
Here we also have the simplicity- and data-description-problem.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your
Hi Andreas,
the dependency astro-virtualobservatory does not seem to be available in the
archive yet.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi Andreas,
according to COPYING and the file headers, the license seems to be LGPL-2.1+
now.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
please mention
sagenb-0.13/sagenb/testing/selenium/selenium.py
in your debian/coypright.
As sagenb/data/jquery/plugins/extendedclick/* just talks about GPL without
any version, one can assume GPL-1+. Looking at the date of publishing,
it might be reduced to GPL-3+. Mentioning this would
Hi,
please mention
maxima-5.35.1/interfaces/emacs/imaxima/breqn097a/*
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
in case the license is GPL-3, your License block should not contain
"or (at your option) any later version.". This doesn't seem to match.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which
Hi Andreas,
please mention Expat and SIL for files in cvxopt-1.1.8/doc/source/.themes/* in
your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention readline.c
in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi Jose,
I marked your package for accept, but please mention Google as gtest author in
your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Joost,
some files are licensed under GPL-3+, so the GPL-2+ in your debian/copyright
doesn't seem to be correct.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
The license of OptionParser.lua and init.lua doesn't seem to be BSD3,
so please mention them in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if
This is number 3)
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Jose,
I marked your package for accept, but you should extend your LGPL-2.1 license
block from kido/lcpsolver/common.h to something like kido/lcpsolver/*
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
your package Depends: on lua-torch-paths, lua-torch-torch7
Do you want to upload them as well?
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hi Jose,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please mention
ignition-msgs-0.4.0/doc/search.js
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Kartik,
please mention the LPPL of some tex stuff in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing
Hi Kartik,
please mention the LPPL of some tex stuff in your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing
Hi Joost,
according to NEWS the license of this package has been changed from
GPL-2 to GPL-3+. Please update your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address
accepted, but with the same wish ...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hi Kartik,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the license of
apertium-hbs-mkd-0.1.0~r57554/freerbmt2012/*.sty
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you
Hi Kartik,
this package has the same missing-license-problem of some latex styles.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers
Hi Andreas,
for whatever reason the fileheader of R/bptest.sarlm.R does not match the
entry in your debian/copyright.
While you are at it, the copyright holder of R/lextrB.R (Daniel A. Griffith)
and R/nb2mat.R (Martin Gubri) should be mentioned as well.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel
Sorry, but only the pointer to /usr/share/common-licenses is ok.
Otherwise the complete license text needs to be in the license block.
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi Anton,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Lots of files seems to be only available under LGPL-3+ now.
Please mention them in your debian/copyright.
While you are at it, please take also care of:
W: getfem++ source: dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique (paragraph at line
39)
Hi Julien,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please mention the license of
ntl-9.9.0/src/GetTime0.c
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which
Hi Thomas,
I marked your package for accept, but please mention toulbar2/src/SimpleOpt.h
in your debian/copyright as well.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Andreas,
please remove clapack-3.2.1-CMAKE/INSTALL/psfig.tex from a package
that is intended for main:
% Permission is granted for use and non-profit distribution of psfig/tex
% providing that this notice be clearly maintained, but the right to
% distribute any portion of psfig/tex for
Hi Joel,
unfortunately I have to reject your package.
Please add the license information of:
doc/user/listings.cfg
to your debian/copyright.
Also there is no need to add the complete license text of the Apache license
to your debian/copyright.
As this license is available in
Hi Wolfgang,
unfortunately I have to reject your package. Please mention the
licenses of:
CalculiX/cgx_2.10/netgen/ng_vol.cpp
CalculiX/cgx_2.10/examples/dolfyn/cgx.patch
CalculiX/cgx_2.10/src/trackball.c
in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this
as requested by email
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
same reason
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Andreas,
ok, one step further, but two questions remain:
- "... in its entirety ...", not being a native speaker, but for me that
sounds like you are only allowed to distribute the whole example code
and are not allowed to use just parts of it
- anyway, the main point is that you are
Hi Mattia,
at least vmtk-1.3/distribution/egg/windows_dll/*/msvcp110.dll doesn't
seem to be distributable. So I am afraid they must be removed from the
source tarball.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if
Hi Andreas,
the issues about src/soigraph.c are not really solved.
According to the file:
* The subroutines TwoCirclesxx and SubVec are adapted for R and Double
* precision coordinates by Nicholas Lewin-Koh, from Computational
* Geometry in C, Joseph O'Rourke, Cambridge University Press
*
as requested by email
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Jose,
I marked your package for accept.
Don't you want to mention the OSR foundation as copyright holder in
your debian/copyright?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Alastair,
I marked your package for accept, but please mention the GPL-2+ license
of some files in your debian/copyright.
While you are at it, there doesn't seem to exist "Files: test/*" in the
source tarball and this:
E: libdxflib3:
Hi Nico,
I marked the package for accept, but please add the license of
./trilinos-12.4.2-Source/packages/stk/stk_classic/stk_percept/unit_tests/boost_python_getting_started1.cref
to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Jose,
your debian/copyright looks a bit strange.
You don't need to insert the complete text of the LGPL-license but can
instead point to the corresponding file in /usr/share/common-licenses.
You tried this for GPL-2 but the text of that license block contains
"or (at your option) any later
Hi Daniel,
I marked the package for accept, but please mention in your debian/coypright
that lubridate/src/tparse.c is licensed under GPL-2+.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Daniel,
as your R-package contains data files, please describe the contents in
debian/README.source (the reasoning is explained in [1]).
Thanks!
Thorsten
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/09/msg00332.html
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't
Hi Maarten,
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016, Maarten van Gompel wrote:
Thanks for processing the package. If I understand correctly (it's my first
package) this issue is only because of pynlpl/datatypes.py which subsumes MIT
licensed code and I should just stick to the the GPLv3 for it as indicated in
the
Hi Drew,
can you please take care of
E: petsc4py source: source-is-missing docs/usrman/_static/jquery.js line
length is 517 characters (>512)
E: petsc4py source: source-is-missing docs/usrman/_static/underscore.js line
length is 530 characters (>512)
and mention the licenses of those files
Hi Maarten,
according to the file header, the license is only GPL-3.
So can you please adapt your debian/copyright?
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
Hi Kartik,
can you please explain why these files are licensed under GPL-3+?
If I remember correctly other apertium stuff is licensed under GPL-!?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Joel,
unfortunately i have to reject your package.
As the OSL-3 is not compatible with DFSG, this software is unsuitable for main.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address
Hi Ruben,
please mention the files under LGPL in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
Hi Joost,
please take care of:
E: r-cran-markdown: privacy-breach-uses-embedded-file
usr/lib/R/site-library/markdown/resources/mathjax.html You may use
libjs-mathjax package.
(https://cdn.mathjax.org/mathjax/latest/mathjax.js?config=tex-ams-mml_htmlormml)
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel
Hi Ghislain,
please mention the BSD license of doc/* in your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing
newer version accepted
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
newer version accepted
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Joost,
please add the missing license of inst/shiny/* to your debian/coypright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers
Hi Bastien,
as testset/isi/ISI_export_format.html is licensed under CC-NC, please
remove this file from a package for main.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
again some lintian warnings ...
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
Hi everybody,
I marked the package for accept, but please take care of the lintian warnings
related to your debian/copyright.
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
newer version accepted
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Leo,
I marked your package for accept, but it is a bit strange that setup.py
also contains a reference to the MIT license.
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Ruben and Steffen,
you still have all those binaries /usr/bin/icebox*. Don't you think that this
might collide with the icebox package, which provides /usr/bin/icebox?
Wouldn't it be possible to renane all those ice* to something like fpga_ice*
as well?
Thorsten
--
Hi everybody,
as cmake-modules is a rather common name, I would suggest to also rename the
binary package to ros-cmake-modules.
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
Hi everybody,
please take care of:
E: librospack-dev: pkg-config-multi-arch-wrong-dir
usr/lib/pkgconfig/rospack.pc full text contains architecture specific dir
x86_64-linux-gnu
Thanks!
Thorsten
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were
Hi Ruben,
your package Recommends: arachne-pnr. Can you please tell me where I can find
this?
Thanks!
Thorsten
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo