On 18/12/16 at 11:26 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 18:15:19 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:41:08 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:47:57 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 17/09/16 at 10:13 +0200, Francesco Poli
On Sat, 29 Oct 2016 18:15:19 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:41:08 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:47:57 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > > On 17/09/16 at 10:13 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:23:48 +0200 Francesco Poli
On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:41:08 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:47:57 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > On 17/09/16 at 10:13 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:23:48 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> > >
[...]
> > > > This is the kind of help I have been
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:47:57 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 17/09/16 at 10:13 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:23:48 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:27:47 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> > > > who is very active in the French Free Software
On 17/09/16 at 10:13 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:23:48 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:27:47 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> [...]
> > > It seems that the main SCOTCH copyright holders is Francois Pellegrini,
> >
> > It is my understanding that he
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:23:48 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:27:47 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
> > It seems that the main SCOTCH copyright holders is Francois Pellegrini,
>
> It is my understanding that he is the main author, but the copyright
> holder is INRIA (along
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:27:47 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/03/14 at 22:26 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
> > (A) SCOTCH copyright holders should be contacted and persuaded to
> > re-license (or dual-license) it under GPLv2-or-later-compatible terms
>
> Hi Francesco,
Hello
On 09/03/14 at 22:26 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> Package: libpetsc3.4.2
> Version: 3.4.2.dfsg1-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
> User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: scotch-license-issues
>
> Hello,
> the library
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:00:22 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I am more and more worried by the lack of answers from the
FTP Masters.
The jessie freeze is quickly approaching and I am concerned that this
license incompatibility issue (bug #741196 and the other similar bug
reports against
On 14/09/2014 16:11, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 23:00:22 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I am more and more worried by the lack of answers from the
FTP Masters.
Bye.
Hello again FTP Masters,
just a friendly ping about this troublesome issue.
Please please please express
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 11:46:27 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:08:47 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
[...]
Please have some patience and wait for an answer from
FTP-masters.
So be it.
But I believe I have already explained the situation, hence I hope
it's clear that, in
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:08:47 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote:
severity 741196 important
tags 741196 +moreinfo
thanks
2014-06-21 16:34 GMT+02:00 Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org:
In the absence of any reply from either the FTP Masters or Julien, I am
raising the severity of this bug
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Wed, 21 May 2014 21:57:19 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Dear FTP Masters,
I've been asked by Julien Cristau (who reads this message in copy) to
get a confirmation in an authoritative statement from ftpmaster that
the CeCILL-C
On Thu, 15 May 2014 00:46:35 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:41:46 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 00:41:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Regardless of what the license is
Processing control commands:
severity -1 important
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 00:41:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:48:34 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 18:34:35 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
As already said in the original bug report,
On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:41:46 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 00:41:10 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Regardless of what the license is *intended* to be, CeCILL-C in fact
includes restrictions not present in
Processing control commands:
tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #741196 to the same tags previously set
--
741196:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 22:26:06 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
= libptscotch-5.1.so and libptscotcherr-5.1.so, which are released
under the GPL-incompatible terms of the CeCILL-C v1.0 license
Do you have a reference for this claimed
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
741196: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741196
Debian Bug Tracking System
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 18:34:35 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Tue, 13 May 2014 11:37:17 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
[...]
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 22:26:06 +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
= libptscotch-5.1.so and libptscotcherr-5.1.so,
On Tue, 13 May 2014 18:48:34 +0200 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 18:34:35 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
As already said in the original bug report, please see the almost
identical bug #740463 for some further details about the SCOTCH
licensing issues.
I hope this
22 matches
Mail list logo
