Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-05-04 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org [140424 21:24]: tisdagen den 22 april 2014 22.12.24 skrev Steve M. Robbins: I think I understand the rationale for using the super-fine-grained symbol versioning. If someone from the debian-science-maintainers team would like to maintain this file,

Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 21:24:17 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: tisdagen den 22 april 2014 22.12.24 skrev Steve M. Robbins: I think I understand the rationale for using the super-fine-grained symbol versioning. If someone from the debian-science-maintainers team would like to maintain

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-24 Thread Magnus Holmgren
tisdagen den 22 april 2014 22.12.24 skrev Steve M. Robbins: I think I understand the rationale for using the super-fine-grained symbol versioning. If someone from the debian-science-maintainers team would like to maintain this file, please go ahead and commit it to the repository.

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-22 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Well, Thank you. On April 21, 2014 04:56:21 PM Niels Möller wrote: Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org writes: Oh well, I went ahead and did it for you. However, as you can see, some symbols went missing in both 5.1 and 6.0. Are those the ones in the #MISSING: lines in your file? They

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-21 Thread Niels Möller
Magnus Holmgren holmg...@debian.org writes: Oh well, I went ahead and did it for you. However, as you can see, some symbols went missing in both 5.1 and 6.0. Are those the ones in the #MISSING: lines in your file? They are all undocumented internal functions in GMP. Regards, /Niels --

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Ivo De Decker
Hi Magnus, On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 01:14:18AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: lördagen den 19 april 2014 15.21.21 skrev Ivo De Decker: The new nettle upload contains a version of libhogweed2 which uses symbols from the new version (6.0.0) of libgmp10, but it doesn't have a versioned

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
reassign 745233 libgmp10 retitle 745233 libgmp10: Wrong shlibs information after 6.0.0 adds new symbols affects 745233 libhogweed2 thanks söndagen den 20 april 2014 12.55.09 Ivo De Decker: On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 01:14:18AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: That kind of thing should never happen;

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
söndagen den 20 april 2014 12.53.02 skrev Steve M. Robbins: So to be sure: adding -V is the right thing to do here? You should add -V libgmp10 (= 6.0.0) and keep it that way until further symbols are added. But preferably you should create a symbols file so that packages that don't use the

Re: Bug#745233: libhogweed2: should have versioned depend on newer libgmp10

2014-04-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
söndagen den 20 april 2014 20.38.55 skrev Magnus Holmgren: söndagen den 20 april 2014 12.53.02 skrev Steve M. Robbins: So to be sure: adding -V is the right thing to do here? You should add -V libgmp10 (= 6.0.0) and keep it that way until further symbols are added. But preferably you